657
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 50 points 1 year ago

Dog shaped gelatinous cube.

[-] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 50 points 1 year ago

So I don't really know much about DnD and was wondering what exactly would be happening moving forward here? Does the Paladin receive some sort of debuff and then has to fight the creature alone? I don't really have any ideas

[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 90 points 1 year ago

The Paladin would try to convince the rest of the party NOT to go help the poor little doggo.

[-] guy@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Wouldn't it be obvious that it's not a dog though. You don't need to see the image to know it's not gonna be a dog, given the setup

[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 128 points 1 year ago

Two things:

  1. As a DM, giving players false positives when they try to metagame is HILARIOUS.

  2. Players are generally expected to act "in-character". D&D isn't a game about winning or losing, it's about making a story.

[-] Eufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.de 65 points 1 year ago

The players know that. Their characters don't.

[-] LennethAegis@kbin.social 58 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Part of roleplaying is not metagaming. Even if the players suspect something is wrong, you play like you don't because your character would not know that. At least I find it more fun to play that way. I'm not there to min/max my adventure.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I wouldn’t even akin meta gaming to min-maxing, I’d say its closer to cheating. Not everyone plays the same obviously, and I’m sure some are fine with it. But your character is acting on information they couldn’t possibly know.

I get that it’s not technically cheating at a lot of tables, which is why we call it meta gaming instead, but still… it’s kinda BS.

[-] LennethAegis@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

It's only cheating if you know for sure what the DM is going to do and they are not just messing with you. This situation could totally just be an actual dog that only the Paladin thinks is a monster due to DM nonsense.

[-] Lupus108@feddit.de 27 points 1 year ago

The players may know something is up, but the characters do not, so for the sake of roleplay there should be a conflict between the paladin and the rest of the group.

[-] BluesF@feddit.uk 23 points 1 year ago

Part of what's so funny about RPGs is being able to anticipate things that your character can't, and so they do stupid things for stupid reasons

[-] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I assume the Paladin would either have to try to roll to persuade the other players that it's definitely not a Labrador, dispell whatever illusion the creature is casting, or they would indeed have to fight them alone (possibly with the other players trying to stop them, cause who kills a Labrador)

[-] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As a DM you just watch how the players handle it. Very fun to cause such a conflict between your players where you force them into opposing roles.
In short: you set the scene and watch 'em dance. 😄

[-] threegnomes@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think this is homebrew so it would be completely up to the dm any effects of the creature and if it was hostile.

Wait, don’t all dogs talk and fly?

[-] CopernicusQwark@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[-] Rheios@ttrpg.network 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My players shall curse you for the fun you'll have given me on their next trek out of the city. I'm think Yeth hound stats but I'm flexible atm. Maybe a shadow.

[-] Acrelorraine@ttrpg.network 5 points 1 year ago

I used this image in a horror one shot after I saw it. Lots of fun there, they were kids on a school camping trip rather than an adventuring party and occasionally they’d spot it in the woods.

[-] dbx12@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

I first read it like you were DMing a one shot for school children on a camping trip. That would've been one bold move.

[-] Blamemeta@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago
[-] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago
[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago
[-] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

A little known fact, the barkbark vulgaris can actually be created or spotted, it depends on the blood type of the carcass used for its nest.

[-] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 5 points 1 year ago

African or European? How fast is it while gripping a coconut by the husk?

[-] PlexSheep@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

For the confused like me: I just searched for it and barkbarks are not a thing. (That means they were not until now.)

[-] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Because it’s not on the internets, doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.

[-] funkyb@ttrpg.network 3 points 1 year ago

Call of Cthulhu vibes here. Some rolls you want to fail, because you're better off not knowing.

[-] Yora@diyrpg.org 2 points 1 year ago

"Komm da weg, Idioten!"

this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
657 points (98.2% liked)

RPGMemes

10304 readers
262 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS