this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2025
1268 points (98.0% liked)

Uplifting News

14041 readers
598 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(not my OC nor my OP, just helping spread the message around:-)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 61 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Great but I already do as much as I personally can handle. Would be great if society at large, e.g. laws, regulations, and big corps, could get on the same level.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 49 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Me: dusts off hands Installed solar on the roof, bicycling to work, updated the insulation on all my windows, and drastically reduced the amount of plastic in my life.

Tech Company Next Door: CONSUMES 70 MwH OF POWER FOR TWO YEARS STRAIGHT POWERING AN UNOPTIMIZED AI

Me: Begins flipping through a copy of How To Blow Up A Pipeline

[–] LostXOR@fedia.io 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Don't blow up the pipeline, that'll pollute the environment! Go for the pumping infrastructure, if you can knock out a pump you can decrease or even completely stop the flow of oil.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

id guess pumps are more expensive to fix too. but also probably better guarded.

[–] 9bananas@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

eh, I don't think that's gonna make much of a difference:

most of the cost is probably lost revenue from the stopped flow, not the pump itself!

that said you're almost at the ideal target already!

it's best to sabotage the nexus point nearest the pipeline source: that way you knock out the largest part of the network resulting in the most damage by disabling most of the network!

tl;dr: knock out infrastructure as close to the source as possible, that isn't actually the source!

(because sabotaging the source is a really, really bad idea, see: every oil spill ever)

(and for fucks sake, don't do any of this in winter...people might freeze, if there's no time to come up with alternative energy sources...which is why late spring is the best time to blow up a pipeline! :D )

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I agree, many of us have maxed out passive improvements. Now let's work on active.

Call your local oil company CEO. Get a job at Exxon and really half ass it. Visit your town government and demand better public transport and electric busses. Take a dump on the nearest gas pump.

Only some of those are jokes and I'm not sure which.

Don't poop on stuff you don't own.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Don’t poop on stuff you don’t own.

Bad news for everyone who rents their home, and thus doesn’t technically own a toilet :(

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 27 points 1 month ago (5 children)

There’s a clear difference between being in big trouble and being completely screwed. If we can avoid the extinction of humanity and go with catastrophic disasters and famine that eradicates vast majority of the population, we should totally do it.

Ideally, we would avoid all that, and go back to the good old days. Every small step towards that goal is worth it, although taking longer steps is highly encouraged.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (6 children)

its to late, its over, to prevent catastrophe.

its not to late to ensure we have a minimal catastrophe instead of a maximal catastrophe.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ladicius@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Above a certain threshold there will be no discernible difference in the outcome to our civilisation.

The planet is fine. The people are fucked. G. Carlin was and is right.

[–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 57 points 1 month ago (10 children)

No offense, but this is exactly the kind of active pessimism that this post is trying to combat. The only mindset that creates positive change is active optimism. In other words, hope for better and taking action to try and get there.

Note that this is not to be confused with inactive optimism. "Everything will just work out on its own". That also doesn't work.

Active pessimism is the most damaging mindset, though, because it actively drains others of their will to make things better. Feeling hopeless is real and understandable, I've been feeling it, too. Spreading it around and shutting down those who are trying to do better isn't the way to process it, though.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 month ago

No offense, but this is exactly the kind of active pessimism that this post is trying to combat

I agree with you, but I'm not sure the post is really effective for that goal.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Okay. But every minute we can delay reaching that threshold will be worth it.

To me it's the same as the US democracy right now. Yes it's far too late to see no ill effects and we are already facing the consequences, but every act of resistance to unlawful, immoral and unconstitutional orders slow them down, and with enough co-ordination may slow them down enough before Trump and the oligarchs become truly unstoppable.

For any issue that effects our world's existence, stand boldly and take action. Don't let the fear of the inevitability of it consume you.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

“The Earth will just shake us off like a bad case of fleas.”

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

It'll at least determine how many species survive. And the threshold to total human extinction is very high, so every ton of co2 is part of a life saved.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It’s just a question of how bad we’ll have it at this point.

[–] davesmith@feddit.uk 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

There are always best and worst case scenarios.

We are currently comprehensively losing the battle for 3C@2100 (which comes with increasingly harmful-to-devastating impacts in the intervening years and decades: future climate refugees will make the current not-far-off-a-London a decade seem like a picnic. A situation fascists will no doubt exploit).

It looks like the only way to prevent 4C plus and, a future Earth only described in science fiction, is mass civil disobedience.

But the UK government appears to be the worst in any civilised country in terms of squashing dissent, and most of the public appears to be more concerned with not being delayed on their commutes.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] WorkshopBubby@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I feel like in a way, it is too late. The human race decided it doesn't care to fight climate change. There is going to be significant disruptions, especially near the equator. But on the other hand, even if we overshoot our climate targets, there is always a chance for us to reverse the damage dealt using technology and by reclamation of ecosystems that have been destroyed. I think as long as our species survives we can fix things. But we need a massive, massive change in attitude to muster the political will to do something.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

A few billionaires and rich old assholes decided not to fight climate change. They have a disproportional amount of time behind the mic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Kind of feels like in 20-30 years time we'll be claiming its worth fighting for a climate that doesn't immediately kill us if we go outside for 20 minutes instead of 15.

Or to put it another way, do these scientists not see there's a difference between living and surviving?

[–] FMT99@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're right, better just give up now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stickly@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

God forbid someone tries to think past the next quarter.

If the future can't be livable and people just wants a quiet suicide for the human race I've got good news. There's a very easy solution for avoiding that discomfort that also happens to be the #1 way to reduce your carbon footprint.

But if you want to keep living and not just surviving, suck it up...

[–] Merlu@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

The post is right, but only on the paper, and not really in a world that is progressively taken over by ecocidal autocrats whose program is to kill every bit of efforts in climate fight, so even the smallest progress we made will soon be distant memories and fighting will be increasingly dangerous and difficult and, ultimately, virtually impossible. And the locked-in catastrophes are now sufficient to collapse our already fragilized geopolitical context.

People saying it's "not too late" are systematically downplaying the current political context, wich make their message pretty unconsistent.

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I didn’t get that at all from the OP, what I saw was “every bit matters so keep fighting.”

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] stickly@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

If anything the current political context makes what needs to be done pretty clear. There's a difference between downplaying the problem and realizing that if laying down and dieing isn't an option.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] _Cid_@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (10 children)

A bit sad how pessimistic everyone is. Renewables are currently becoming the most economic way to produce electricity and even states that do not care about the environment are investing in it. EVs are making progress as well. And while it is true that a lot of damage has already been done and we will face the consequences, I also feel that decarbonization is inevitable even from a economic perspective at this point. The speed at which this happens is variable though and determines how many people will die, this is why it is important to not be pessimistic and hopeless but to try steering things in the right direction.

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 month ago (5 children)

A bit sad how pessimistic everyone is.

Americans are pessimistic because we don't have a functional democracy and our fascist oligarchs are too stupid to use their resources to fight climate change.... And the rest of the world is pessimistic because the world's most powerful economy and military has fallen to fascist oligarchy.

Nothing will change until we abolish the billionaires and replace our two party system with a modern multiparty parliamentary system with proportional representation

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] cornshark@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not sure this tweet counts as news?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

We couldn't get people to wear a mask or get a shot when a disease was killing millions in the open.

We definitely can't get people to change their behavior over climate change.

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 month ago

That's because billionaires like Robert Murdock own all our media and they use their power to push disinformation to undermine class solidarity and democracy.

If we want to save the world then we have to get rid of the billionaires asap as they are the greatest threat to democracy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ekZepp@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ok, got it. No burning at the stake. We'll use guillotines.👍

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Reminder that there's no "it's too late, its over" for climate change

That can be totally misread.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago
[–] NotLemming@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Umm, as I understand it, that's not the way the tipping point works

[–] Karjalan@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

You're confusing completely averting things, with mitigating how bad they are.

[–] Rin@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago

Well, at this point, we're fucked. The only difference now is how fucked we are.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 month ago

It's the difference between "really bad" and "even worse".

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I was going to present a partial rebuttal invoking politics but then I saw that this is !upliftingnews@lemmy.world.

Another positive is that we humans are highly adaptive. We’re already making a lot of changes towards renewables and improving the efficiency and reliability of our electric grids and other large infrastructure. Climate change definitely brings a ton of challenges with it (and some of the changes have already taken place) but I think it also gives us new opportunities such as longer growing seasons up North.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Seriously, if there's one thing I don't miss from reddit (I tell a lie, there's dozens of things I don't miss from Reddit) it's the "Actually we're too far gone, and everyone's going to die in seven days because none of you jokers will buy a Tesla!~" nonsense

Funfact: Conspiracy Bullshit in the other direction is still Conspiracy Bullshit

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UrukGuy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (7 children)

As individuals we can try, but the average population is too selfish and isn't going to stop until it's too late

Between the likes of pollution, deforestation, wars, extinction of species to name a few...the only thing that could save this planet is humanity somehow becoming infertile.

[–] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I don't know if it's really selfish more people are a part of a system that is bigger than them that forces them into situations that have a negative impact on CO2 levels

Working a job that has low pay which probably force people to housing that is further from their work place, in America most cities don't have a great public transportation infrastructure nor do they have alternative commuting options like protected bike lanes. This forces people to have to drive more.

The Return to Office bullshit has forced more cars on the road that were not there 4 years ago which is impacting CO2 levels

These are just 2 of many different things that the system has created that have put people in situations that make slowing CO2 levels more difficult.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 month ago

Remember that it can always be worse. Even if it's irreversible in our lifetimes, it can always be hotter and more extreme.

load more comments
view more: next ›