this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
137 points (99.3% liked)

New York Times gift articles

734 readers
282 users here now

Share your New York Times gift articles links here.

Rules:

Info:

Tip:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ricketyrackets@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 week ago

The passion of the magas.

Staring Mel Gibson and 70+ million stupid inbred Americans.

[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 21 points 1 week ago

I'd rather we deport him.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Send this Aussie back home.

Love, an actually empathetic USian who is just really tired of the constant hypocrisy. Love you, Aussies.

[–] klu9@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Born January 3, 1956, Peekskill, New York, U.S.A. Family moved to Australia in 1968, so that the sons wouldn't get drafted and sent to fight people Mel probably has some choice words to describe when he's had a few.

[–] TheSambassador@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Somehow I read "fired upon" and I was imagining Mel Gibson just shooting at them until they agreed to restore the gun rights.

[–] klu9@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

“He then essentially explained to me that Mel Gibson has a personal relationship with President Trump and that should be sufficient basis for me to make a recommendation and that I would be wise to make the recommendation,” she said.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrimonialism

Patrimonialism is a form of governance in which the ruler governs on the basis of personal loyalties which are derived from patron-client relations, personal allegiances, kin ties and combinations thereof.[1] Patrimonialism is closely related to corruption, opportunism and machine politics.[2] It can contribute to underdevelopment and weak state capacity.[3]

In contrast to many other systems of governance, the ruler does not derive their legitimacy from their personal charisma or a sense of mission, but primarily through their ability to dole out rewards and punishments.[1][2] Initially coined by Max Weber, patrimonialism stands in contrast to rational-legal bureaucracies, as there is no objective of efficiency in public administration and government staff are not advanced based on merit, experience and training.