this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
240 points (97.6% liked)

News

27785 readers
4242 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 90 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I wonder what they are hiding.

[–] metaldream@sopuli.xyz 37 points 1 day ago

They're hiding his political motive so they have an excuse to not charge their violent extremist buddy with terrorism.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Probably his intent to kill, which is not part of the charges.

[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wonder how many cheeseburgers they bought him, too.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

The statement was a take out order.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

what a sad, pathetic loser.

Willing to kill people because he "Stands with" a car brand.

Hope he gets put away for a very long time.

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

He might get a pardon.

[–] known_unknown@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Pam Bondi has redefined the word to mean anything against Trump or Elon, unfortunately.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 day ago

The report states that Dutil got out of the vehicle and then walked into the dealership. An employee told deputies that Dutil told workers there that he “stands with Tesla” and then “walked out.”

lol

A statement Dutil made to deputies was redacted from the arrest report.

That seems pretty unusual for a sherrif's office.

[–] imvii@lemmy.ca 46 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Stands with Tesla.

Drives a Nissan.

Hilarious.

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

These are the kinds of people that support billionaires whilst living paycheck to paycheck. Aka Republican voters.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Why are the crazies on the right always violent?

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 48 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Future headline:

"Donald Trump has announced a medal of freedom to be awarded to Mr.Dutil and any charges will be dropped. Mr.Dutil has been recruited to the DOJ."

[–] crawancon@lemm.ee 23 points 1 day ago

jfc too real

[–] Whateley@lemm.ee 18 points 1 day ago

He looks like the kind of asshole that yells at his family in public.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Violence is an intrinsic part of fascism. It is the inevitable consequence of "might makes right". Be prepared for a lot more violence. Probably on both sides.

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Brown shirts are unofficially part of the administration. This is going to get a lot worse if we don't figure out how to de-escalate

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

if we don't figure out how to de-escalate

That’s the crux of the issue. The only way to deescalate against a “might makes right” approach is to match violence with violence. Rolling over and “taking the high road” will just end up with the violent people continuing to be violent because they didn’t have any consequences the last time. “De-escalating” can’t be done by giving the bully your lunch money, because they’ll just be back again tomorrow.

You at least need to make yourself an unattractive target, so they’re likely to go bother someone else instead. Even if you don’t totally stop the behavior, you at least need to send a strong “if you fuck with me specifically you will have problems” signal. Even if you don’t stop the bully, you at least ensure that you’re not the target.

That’s a large part of why the Black Panthers got started. People realized that peaceful unarmed protests would get violently busted by the cops. In contrast, peaceful heavily armed protests would have cops politely watching from across the street.

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah I agree. I'm just trying to not be accused of "calling for violence" in my public lemmy posts lol

[–] svc@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 39 points 1 day ago

Andrew Dutil's home and vehicles can be considered honorary Teslas

[–] smokin_shinobi@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Driving into a mob sounds like a good way to be violently stomped to death by any survivors in said mob.

[–] MantisToboggon@lazysoci.al 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Jokes on them the door handle broke weeks ago. No getting inside this with the windows up.

[–] Ceruleum@lemmy.wtf 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also not getting out if a fire would to break out.

[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

🤔 interesting...

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 17 points 1 day ago

Behold the lumpenmagatariat.

[–] 96ToyotaCamry@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Driving into protesters is essentially legal in Florida per the Riot Bill if I recall. They made caveats to it like they have to be obstructing the road, as if that makes it much better. https://flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2021/1/?Tab=BillHistory

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Did he yell "they're coming right for us!" First?

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He drove up on the sidewalk.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Were they obstructing the sidewalk? I could see Florida Lawyer making a case from that.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

what is a sidewalk but a road for filthy poors and peasants to do their un-christian walking on?

[–] metaldream@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They probably had a permit from the police so the answer is most likely no. Can't really argue that they're "obstructing" the sidewalk when you gave them permission to be there. That would hold up on Fox News but not in a courtroom.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To traffic? A normal pedestrian is "obstructing" the sidewalk to a car. Vehicles have no right of way there!

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

No, not to vehicles, to pedestrians. The IRONIC point being made was, even that would be sufficient.

[–] griff 8 points 1 day ago

Thinks he’s doing god’s work no doubt…/S

[–] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

All you had to say was “Florida man” and I’m like “yup that’s the problem”

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Wierd like what dog does he have on this race?

[–] IHeartBadCode@fedia.io 17 points 1 day ago

He has pent up emotional trauma that he has refused to work through with a therapist like a normal human being.

Thus he sees inflicting human suffering as a viable alternative to working through those issues. Because that was he can feel better knowing others are worse off.

That's the dog. Should it be in the race? Nah. But some cucklefucks just refuse to act like normal human beings. Maybe a therapist isn't alpha male enough or some shit? But for one reason or another they just refuse to address their mental trauma like normal people.

Identity politics. They see an attack against a conservative brand as an attack against themselves.

It's about oppression. He feels justified to oppress those he disagrees with because they did it to him (they didn't but he believes it).