this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2025
283 points (97.3% liked)

World News

45229 readers
4374 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Minutes before the United States launched a deadly missile campaign in Yemen that reportedly killed 53 people and wounded 89, including multiple children, on March 15, the Atlantic’s Editor-in-Chief Jeffrey Goldberg was sitting in his car in a grocery store parking lot waiting for the attack.

The story is now well-known and well-memed: Days before the missile barrage, Goldberg was added to a Signal group chat called “Houthi PC small group” after President Donald Trump’s national security advisor, Michael Waltz, invited him to connect on the encrypted message application. The editor was included in the discussion inadvertently, a spokesperson for the National Security Council acknowledged to the Atlantic.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 22 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It’s whiskeyleaks, not signalgate. The problem was the users in question couldn’t put together a Duplo set without help with a toddler. Signal is great in terms of opsec if you’re not an idiot.

The illegality of self-destructing messages in this sort of discussion is an adjacent but separate matter, but it is still (supposed to be) very illegal.

But I guess it’s ok because the DUI hire is “doing his best”.

[–] whereisk@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Tbf, Signal, and most modern chat clients with multi-device syncing are not great for opsec.

When it comes to privacy from mass surveillance or using your metadata to mine demographic preferences who you are talking to etc Signal sits at the top of generally available chat clients.

But it’s geared for the convenience and privacy of the average user not military security.

Eg: when it comes to group chats you just have to get one of the members of the chat to fall for a device syncing link, for then the whole group chat future messages to become available to the attacker. What’s more, no admin or other user of the chat gets to have approval or visibility privileges or notification of a new synced device for that chat or any info about the status of each of the devices on that chat.

[–] Laser@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago

But it’s geared for the convenience and privacy of the average user not military security.

Military security (or military grade whatever) is a buzzword that makes sense in some contexts. In a lot of them, it doesn't.

For example, for a lot of military-grade products you can have assumptions that are not always given for a platform that messenger operate on. Like that the device is always stored in a secure location. That it's administered by trained personnel. That the device operator has received training on proper usage etc. In fact, a lot of military systems probably couldn't be operated securely in a John Doe context b because of environmental security requirements. In that regard, messengers have to be more secure.

For most normal users, Signal is pretty much as good as it gets. Sure, I can set up a similar bespoke e2e protocol for myself, but I’m also a software engineer with near on two decades of experience. That’s not a reasonable or feasible expectation for the vast majority of the population.

[–] i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Why does that mean it's not signalgate? The name watergate comes from the luxury Watergate hotel in Washington DC where a crime was comitted. Having this conversation on Signal is unquestionably illegal, whether extra people were invited or not, and the scandal is because the conversation being on Signal, not because somebody may have been drunk.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don’t like using that moniker for the clusterfuck because I feel like it implies something’s wrong with Signal. There’s not. There’s something wrong with the set of drunken shitsacks that used it like complete fucking imbeciles.

[–] i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There's nothing wrong with the Watergate or pizza either.

lol true, that’s a totally fair critique of my logic

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Can we retire the "-gate" suffix please?

Not until we have Elongate pls

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 35 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Nope... we're going to have the biggest gates, the best gates, a tremendous amount of gates, to levels nobody has seen before.

So far from off the top of my head:

  • Nazisalutegate
  • Tariffgate
  • Ukrainebaitandswitchgate
  • Ericadamsgate
  • El Salvadorgate
  • Guantanamobaygate
  • Whoopsiefiringgate
  • USAIDgate
  • Mahmoudkahlilgate
  • Lawfirmgate
  • Electionproofofcitizenshipgate

And too many more to list...

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Omg! Is this the start of -gategate??

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

Save time and just classify them all as Trumpgate. Basically spans the entirety of 2016 to 2028 (and if we're in the worst possible timeline long after that as well). Trump was already one of the worst presidents in recent memory, but now he's shooting for the worst of all time. He's going to go down as the president that either destroyed the US or nearly did. At minimum I'm expecting him to be remembered as the cause of the second great depression as well as a significant contributor to instability and war in Europe and Asia (I would include the middle east as well, but that's pretty much business as usual there).

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm not even sure what prompted the use of "gate". What does it mean?

[–] madame_gaymes@programming.dev 18 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)
[–] GiveOver@feddit.uk 4 points 4 days ago

Ah, watergategate

Not until they find some other way to make extremely concerning, bordering-on-treason actions sound like a toddler dropping their milkshake on the ground.

[–] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 26 points 5 days ago

Big Bird and Jeffrey Goldberg are the heroes we do not deserve.

This does big bird dirty.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

NB: These are memes about the signal etc, not memes FROM the signal etc.

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 1 points 7 hours ago

👊🏼🇺🇸💥

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 5 days ago

Yes the meme resistance!!! We got em!!! \s \s \s