724
submitted 10 months ago by sexy_peach@feddit.de to c/fuck_cars@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 111 points 10 months ago

Let me guess what kind of people predominantly lived in the neighborhoods that were bulldozed.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 20 points 10 months ago
[-] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 4 points 10 months ago

So you have a before version?

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 6 points 10 months ago

No, that's from 2000 I think.

Atlanta is still apparently the USA's second most segregated city, so I can't imagine it was a multicultural wonderland in the 1950s.

The article those pictures appear to be from says it was mostly black neighbourhoods demolished.

https://daringivens.medium.com/atlantas-interstates-destruction-of-city-fabric-in-the-1950s-mobility-woes-today-4882b4ec6830

[-] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

Sadly, I don't think there's enough uncertainty to consider it a guess.

[-] squaresinger@feddit.de 76 points 10 months ago

Sure the designers of this monstrosity thought, "There are only black people living there, so it's a win-win" -.-

[-] playereightyone@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

You can thank Robert Moses for that.

[-] ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works 51 points 10 months ago

The expressway must expand in order to acommodate the increasing needs of the expressway

[-] biofaust@lemmy.world 39 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Am I the only one who finds the 1950s version also not nice from an urban planning perspective? I mean, it is a car-centered design anyway.

[-] Atemu@lemmy.ml 36 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Still, do you see how many trees there are? That place must've still looked nice and was certainly transformable into a really nice place without unreasonable effort.

Now, it's basically a wasteland.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] grue@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

No, the 1950s version (actually more like 1900s; those houses were already decades old at the time they were photographed) was good. It was a traditional street grid with small blocks, and there were streetcars going all over the place. Sure it was mostly single-family (probably with more than a few duplexes sprinkled in), but it had great bones for densifying later when demand justified it.

I live only a few miles from the area pictured, in a neighborhood with the same development pattern. Even though it's been damaged by the removal of the old streetcars and having zoning superimposed upon it after the fact (which causes problems by mandating things like too-large setbacks and minimum parking requirements, as well as outlawing corner stores within residential areas), it's still mostly fine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Smk@lemmy.ca 33 points 10 months ago

JUST ONE MORE LAME,I SWEAR TO GOD, JUST ONE MORE LANE AND WE'RE DONE. ONE MOAR LANE. MOAAAAR

[-] uis@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

A little lane of asphalt please,

More pollution if I freeze,

Running over children these,

A fresh bouquet of cancers.

(Parody of Glass of Water)

[-] EthicalAI@beehaw.org 30 points 10 months ago

“Trains Are Too Expensive And Would Take Years To Build“ - guy who remembers the interstate being built.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SecretPancake@feddit.de 27 points 10 months ago

Looks like what happens with headphone cables in the pocket.

[-] Zellith@kbin.social 17 points 10 months ago

I've been playing cities skyline and I'll be honest, when my city gets like that I just restart.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] clearedtoland@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

Nice little neighborhood you got there. Would be a shame if someone needed a new highway, wouldn’t it?

[-] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You can take this picture in just about any city in the US too. NYT did a pretty good piece about it, gifted so y'all can read it: Can Removing Highways Fix America’s Cities? https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/05/27/climate/us-cities-highway-removal.html?unlocked_article_code=1.60w.uuX5.Oo4CsHZXGv8Q&smid=nytcore-android-share

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] arc@lemm.ee 12 points 10 months ago

Cities should be built around people, not motor vehicles.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 10 points 10 months ago

How do roads even end up like this? The cloverleaf is as extreme as I'm willing to drive through. If anything like this came up in Google maps for my drive I would just nope on home.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Engineer answer: being a stack interchange, it's actually easier to navigate than a cloverleaf because there's only one exit in each direction instead of separate "A" and "B" exits with an entrance ramp and weaving in between. The complexity in this case simply comes from the fact that it's superimposed on top of what used to be a street grid, so they added a bunch of exits to local streets.

Big-picture answer: the desire to put freeways there in the first place is the product of mental illness.

[-] glibg10b@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago
[-] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

Yeah they only seem complicated from the air, on the ground you just read the signs and it's always clear, or if you're using your phone - just go in the lane it tells you

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] notannpc@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

It’s a good thing removing all those homes definitely didn’t cause or contribute to any way more serious problems in society. Right?

/s

[-] Hedup@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[-] squaresinger@feddit.de 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Any block is a swastika block if you ignore the right set of roads.

But that's not the block's fault ;)

[-] jakob@soc.schuerz.at 3 points 10 months ago
[-] Hedup@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago

Above the highways a bit to the right. Partially visible.

[-] jakob@soc.schuerz.at 4 points 10 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ForgetPrimacy@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 10 months ago

Oh but at least we know those highways were built there, on top of all those homes, because that was the most efficient place for it and not because the people who lived in those houses were less desirable than those the car making corporation owning fucks liked

[-] Pixelphoria@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago

“What do you mean, why's it got to be built?” he said. “It's a bypass. You've got to build bypasses.” Bypasses are devices that allow some people to dash from point A to point B very fast while other people dash from point B to point A very fast.

[-] jakob@soc.schuerz.at 4 points 10 months ago

@Pixelphoria @sexy_peach
Yesterday i studied the map from portugal... especially around Porto you find a phenomenon...

Bypass for a Bypass for a Bypass for a Bypass...

A classical example for "one more lane will fix it" and "one more street will fix it too"...

NO! It won't fix it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] geogle@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

FYI, unless I'm mistaken, that is spaghetti junction and it's not actually in Atlanta, but just northeast of it in Doraville

Edit: I was severely mistaken...

[-] arditty@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

Sadly, that’s the intersection of I-75/85 and I-20, right in the middle of downtown ATL. Here’s a more recent picture showing some more context.

Also, here’s an article talking about the history of I-20 being built through Atlanta: https://smartgrowthamerica.org/program/divided-by-design/atlanta-ga/

[-] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Also, here’s an article talking about the history of I-20 being built through Atlanta: https://smartgrowthamerica.org/program/divided-by-design/atlanta-ga/

There are still some chucklefucks who want to build I-485 (tunneling under the rich white neighborhoods north of I-20 and bulldozing straight through the poorer and blacker ones south of it, of course).

[-] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 10 months ago

As another said, that's not spaghetti junction (Tom Moreland interchange), but frankly people get pretty fast and loose with how much of the surrounding area they'll call 'Atlanta' anyway. The actual city of Atlanta proper is much smaller than most people would think by just looking at a satellite photo, and the distinction between the many cities usually doesn't matter much unless you live there.

[-] adrian783@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

when people say Atlanta to people that don't live in the surrounding area they really mean the greater metro Atlanta area.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] bioemerl@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago

Zoom out slightly.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
724 points (96.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

9675 readers
100 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS