387
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by spaceghoti@lemmy.one to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] oDDmON@lemmy.world 162 points 1 year ago

Just jail the fat, mouthy fuck and let him talk to the walls.

[-] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 133 points 1 year ago

I get that gradually tightening the screws and doing this extremely methodically will ultimately end up with the most amenable outcome. This is a fundamental test of our legal system and it has to be followed to the letter for it to work.

That being said that's pretty fucking small comfort to a country that jails people for decades for possessing a plant that is legal in many states and yet won't hold accountable a man who we witnessed stirring up a mob to attack the fucking captial building on live television. He's a cult leader that is given a chance to speak on a national media stage again stirring up his base until they storm the capital again.

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 28 points 1 year ago

More severe penalties is still following the legal system. I completely agree that it should all be by the book, but letting him flout the law with minimal repurcuasions undermines the law, not strengthens it.

As you say, there should be equivalency in justice, otherwise it's unjust.

[-] Nudding@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Hitler served 9 months of a 5 year sentence, and wrote mein kampf in jail. Its not over yet, my friend.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 year ago

True, but Trump is old. It's not over, but it likely is for Trump. Someone else will be waiting to take his place though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 94 points 1 year ago

Put this fucker in jail for contempt. Someone really needs to get a pair of balls. WTF!

[-] HuddaBudda@kbin.social 74 points 1 year ago

I have just learned that the very Biased, Trump Hating Judge in D.C., (blah blah blah....), ME, has reimposed a GAG ORDER which will put me at a disadvantage against my prosecutorial and political opponents,” Trump wrote at 12:28 a.m.,

Want to know what's the first thing you should not do when getting a gag order? Eliminate plausible deniability that you saw said gag order and then violate it.

[-] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

And then admit he can't defend himself without verbally attacking everyone in sight

He's so fucking stupid it hurts to watch

[-] halferect@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

If stupid works why change, the guy stupided his way into the white house, stupided his entire life into getting away with countless crimes and potentially will stupid his way back to the white house. Seems pretty smart to be stupid in his situation

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

And yet he keeps getting away with it.

[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 68 points 1 year ago

He's pushing the limits because he's never been held accountable for anything in his life or had to deal with serious consequences. If anything, getting in trouble for this now will just make all the MAGAts even more fanatical and say that he's being targeted by the system, it's a political hit-job, blah blah blah. He should've been locked up a long time ago, but the next best time is today.

[-] orbitz@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 year ago

If you somehow managed to reach into a beehive multiple times without being stung you'd probably think you'll never be stung. It shows why the law can't ignore white collar crimes, you get people like Trump who have never faced real consequences for their actions. I'm pretty sure it's compunded by his narcissism but then you get into sensitive situations because now he's a public figure. Trump should never have been a sensitive situation for the law, he's a criminal and has always been one but they're treating him softer than someone in traffic court where the ticketing officer isn't even there.

[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago

Can't jail rich people. That is why fines exist. Once we fine him enough, he becomes poor people, and you can put poor people in jail.

[-] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

They better step those fines up then.

[-] Jackcooper@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

How many times do you have to fine someone worth 9 figures a 5 figure amount to make them worth 5 figures?

[-] badaboomxx@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

He is not working 9 figures.

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

He's worthless

[-] Melkath@kbin.social 46 points 1 year ago
[-] lettruthout@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

...WITHOUT. HIS. CELLPHONE.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Give him one of those toy ones you give to infants and see if he notices

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

I wonder if all the judges can cooperate on fines. So this judge can say "You pissed off the other judge twice and he doubled your fine? Well I'll double his fine!" It won't take for him to get to 1,280,000

[-] 520@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Absolutely. Doesn't even need cooperation. His previous violations will be available to the current judge, as well as previous sanctions. They absolutely can and should take that into account.

[-] norbert@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

They sure as fuck consider priors when dealing with normal people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

Third violation. Lock him up.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

Why shouldn't he? Every time he's done it so far, he's been given nothing more than either a finger-wag or a nominal fine that wouldn't even qualify as pocket change. If you were engaging in behavior you wanted to engage in and the judge told you to stop or he'd fine you $1.79, would you care?

So far every single one of these judges have bent the knee to Trump. They have all admitted to giving him treatment that nobody else would receive. And they have all proven that their threats are empty. Why should he follow the rules when he knows he'll suffer no meaningful penalty for breaking them?

Throw this guy in jail for a weekend to start, then see if he changes his tune. After that, jail pending trial.

But if these people are going to continue playing Trump's games by Trump's rules, they can't be surprised when he continues to do whatever he wants.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] digdilem@feddit.uk 23 points 1 year ago

Those fines are insultingly small. But putting him in jail would only make him more of a martyr. The law is still struggling to cope with this man.

[-] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 45 points 1 year ago

And...just do it. They are setting a message that if rich = immune to punishment.

[-] spaceghoti@lemmy.one 16 points 1 year ago

Sadly, all this is doing is acknowledging the truth we already knew.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

He makes a terrible martyr, though.

He just won’t shut up! Martyrs are supposed to be dead. You ever hear a dead guy blabber?

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

If Trump was martyred half the MAGAs would insist he's alive and another half will insist he's going to come back some day. The former will point to AI deepfakes created by Russia as proof, and will declare a holy war on the other half. Eventually the problem will solve itself.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

I could care less if the morons see him as a martyr and rise the fuck up. Fucking let them. At this point I'd rather they get gunned down in a blaze of glory than let them silently breed and plan the next fucking coup. Fuck Trump supporters and any who sympathize.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago

That didn't take long...

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago

There we go. Obvious violations of the gag order. He'll see consequences at the heat death of the universe.

[-] athos77@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

One violation, I think - Bill Barr. Both of the judges who have put in gag orders have specifically excluded themselves from being covered by the gag orders.

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Thankfully, I have handy a document to review.

Accordingly, and pursuant to Local Criminal Rule 57.7(c), it is hereby ORDERED that:

All interested parties in this matter, including the parties and their counsel, are prohibited from making any public statements, or directing others to make any public statements, that target (1) the Special Counsel prosecuting this case or his staff; (2) defense counsel or their staff; (3) any of this court’s staff or other supporting personnel; or (4) any reasonably foreseeable witness or the substance of their testimony.

She may have said something different from the bench to clarify this, but she could fall under the emphasized point three. The Court is one entity, the Judge is another entity, which serves the Court.

[-] athos77@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I've been listening to a couple legal podcasts, and they've both said they don't think the judges are covered by the orders.

[-] thorbot@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Let’s just sew his mouth shut so I don’t have to keep hearing about this piece of shit traitorous fuckbag

[-] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I assume this is just going to continue escalating, and I'm really curious to see what the supreme court will respond to this when it inevitably reaches them. Will they allow their fellow judges to be bullied and harassed, discrediting themselves in the process, or finally squeeze this necrotic orange.

[-] KonalaKoala@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Sounds like this is just going to continue escalating until the judge decides to throw the necrotic orange asshole in prison and lock him up.

[-] autotldr 7 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Judge Tanya Chutkan reinstated a gag order on Sunday night barring former President Donald Trump from attacking court staff, potential witnesses, and members of the prosecution team in the federal case against him for allegedly working to overturn the results of the 2020 election.

Trump responded by attacking Attorney General Bill Barr, a potential witness in the case, while continuing his public assault on Chutkan.

While Chutkan has yet to respond to the posts, she would not be the first Judge overseeing a Trump case to level penalties against the former president for violating court-ordered restrictions on his public statements.

Trump has already been fined twice, and threatened with jail, for violating a separate gag order imposed in New York’s civil fraud case against the former president.

Judge Arthur Engoron fined Trump a total of $15,000 last week, accusing him of violating an order barring him from attacking court staff.

Engoron first slapped Trump with a $5,000 penalty and threatened to revoke his bail after the former president failed to delete a copy of the Truth Social post attacking his clerk from his campaign website.


The original article contains 452 words, the summary contains 185 words. Saved 59%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] redballooon@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Engoron first slapped Trump with a $5,000 penalty and threatened to revoke his bail after the former president failed to delete a copy of the Truth Social post attacking his clerk from his campaign website.

Don’t threaten. Do! He has demonstrated that he is a danger to everyone involved in this case.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Of course Trump would.

[-] scytale@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Where are the consequences? He continually breaks all these orders and nothing is happening.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
387 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19241 readers
1765 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS