this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
728 points (99.1% liked)

politics

22831 readers
3734 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump snapped at a reporter who asked how much economic pain he was willing to inflict amid plunging markets triggered by his new tariffs.

Speaking after a weekend at his Florida resort, Trump dismissed speculation he was trying to crash the market, claiming tariffs would bring in "$1 trillion" and spur U.S. manufacturing.

When asked about a pain threshold for Americans, he called the question "so stupid," arguing economic “medicine” was necessary to reverse decades of "stupid leadership."

He insisted the strategy would make the U.S. "solid and strong again."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] drhodl@lemmy.world 44 points 6 days ago (1 children)

....claiming tariffs would bring in “$1 trillion”

They've already LOST $11 trillion. What an utter imbecile!!

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

So it'll just take 11 years to even out.

Edit: Just double checked, it's 1 trillion in the "next year or so". So x >= 11 years :(

[–] drhodl@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

tRump maths...lol.

[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 41 points 6 days ago (1 children)

In fairness to Trump, he has never, ever experienced the consequences of his actions. Bankrupt? Didn't put a dent in his life since his father and banks kept the money flowing to him regardless, more than once. Rapist? No jail time. Fraudster? No jail, not sure that any fines have even been paid. So why would he think, when nothing bad happens to him and he can still golf the weekend away, that anything bad will happen to all the people losing their jobs, their investments, their retirement, their homes? Why don't they all have rich fathers and sycophantic bankers to bail them out? At very least they should have Russian mafia backers like he does, that make it look like he's a billionaire, even if it really is billions in debt to them.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I agree that he wouldn't consider the consequences, but you're mistaken if you think he has given even a single thought to the plight of the people his tariffs are impacting - his narcissism wouldn't allow the thought to even form in his orange head.

[–] Captain_Patchy@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago

It's amazing how confident the truly stupid are.

[–] mhague@lemmy.world 26 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Americans circa 2025 about to take their economic medicine

[–] Sillyglow@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago

sally has to say goodbye to puppy. weekly rations and all.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)

He will tolerate none for himself.

The rest of us can get fucked. STFU about the price of eggs, right? He’s no longer president. He’s gone full dictator. This is all about him.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 5 points 6 days ago

It was always all about him. The election was the only way he was staying out of prison and the campaign was lie after lie after lie, telling his moron supporters what they wanted to hear, in order to secure their vote. He doesn't give a shit about those people once they've posted their ballot.

[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago

"sometimes you have to take medicine to fix something"

Exactly, medicine exists to fix something. What Trump is doing is substance abuse.

[–] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Donald doesn't have to tolerate any pain. He's a billionaire. Billionaire's way of life will still be unbelievably fabulous. It's us that suffer at their expense.

[–] Hazor@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

He's a billionaire.

Allegedly. His inability to pay some of the judgments against him calls that into question, e.g. the E. Jean Carrol suit. If nothing else, he definitely has a billionaire mindset.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

Trump Media and the Trumpcoin crypto scam have, sadly, probably put his net worth back up high enough for him to actually be able to truthfully call himself a billionaire again. He just doesn't pay his court judgements because what are they gonna do about it if he doesn't? Take him to court again? His whole strategy is to make plaintiffs go broke trying to collect from him, which is why he has it out for all the law firms working pro bono against him right now.

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago
[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Can we just elect Camacho? He's more qualified than whatever the fuck we got now

[–] cyphear@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

No can do, Camacho was black. And we can't have another black president. /s

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Economic Medicine? This shit must have been economics course at the fucking failed Trump University.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago

its called a word salad, and the WEAVE.

[–] Sillyglow@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago

he's totally ok that every vulnerable has to eat leather boots to make it through a depression.

"libs were pwned"

[–] Letsdothisok@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Haha. Trumps funny

[–] TheDeadlySquid@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago

Stupid questions for stupid people.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 154 points 1 week ago

Well, it is a stupid question. A real journalist would ask how much more pain he's willing to let the American people tolerate for his poorly disguised reverse pump and dump scheme

[–] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 106 points 1 week ago (10 children)

His motives may be unclear, but his actions are crystal clear. He’s tried to enact tariffs already and been stopped before they were implemented because everyone knows the level of damage they cause. He’s moving forward this time. He’s deliberately crashing the global economy.

Why? Who knows? His Silicon Valley overlords demand it? I doubt it’s Putin, because Russia’s economy is hanging on by a thread, and the last thing they need is a global downturn, especially when it craters oil prices. Is it just that Trump is stupid, maybe senile, and ultimately in charge?

Regardless, the leader of the biggest economy in the world has decided that it’s time for a global recession/depression, so unless that course is changed, that’s probably what’s going to happen.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 99 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Everybody is thinking way, way too much into this.

If Trump would have to answer a question where he doesn't know the answer, or would have to admit that people disagree with him, or he feels even mildly challenged, this is considered a personal attack on him. You are trying to get him to admit to not being 100% perfect 100% of the time. And he responds to that by lashing out like a small child, attacking you, making up childish names for you, and insulting you. This is how he has always responded.

This has nothing to do with his thoughts on economic policies or the effects of his tariffs. He doesn't think far enough ahead to either know or care. This reporter had the audacity to challenge him, and Trump lashed out. That's all. That's how he always responds.

[–] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

So true. You don't have to dig deep into any of his responses when you criticize anything about him. He will lash out. He's a child. That's it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›