this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
223 points (95.9% liked)

politics

24707 readers
3290 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

First time he's ever cared about his children.

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.world 97 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Imagine going after someones kids for political reasons, who would do such a thing /s

[–] Buffaloaf@lemmy.world 67 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Imagine the outrage if a representative showed Congress naked pictures of Ivanka that were stolen from her computer

[–] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one 44 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Trump might actually show his face in congress to get a view of those.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 26 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The pictures were actually stolen from his computer.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"Lots of people have been telling me they're the greatest pictures really the best"

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

"These pictures are the greatest pictures in the world but the corrupt far left wants to censor them"

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

How cute; you think he'd know how to get a picture onto a computer. Or how to use a computer. Or how to take a picture.

[–] bquintb@midwest.social 91 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Leave my children alone! Talking to them is devastating to my case!

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Objection your honor! -Trump

And why is that? - Judge

Because it's devastating to my cause... - Trump

Brought to by ~~Ace Ventura Let Detective~~ Liar Liar. Doing God's work since 1997

[–] confluence@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The quote is from Liar Liar

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I knew that. I just woke up, lol

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

And it's case, not cause. :D

[–] KneeTitts@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

Its not our fault you sucked your own kids into your illegal business trympy... families that crime together do time together

[–] youngGoku@lemmy.world 37 points 2 years ago

Dude you appointed your kids to public servant roles... It's you that subjected them to this.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 34 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It’s just content tailored to his base to make him look oppressed. That’s why he keeps disregarding the gag order too.

I bet his kids say, "I don’t recall" a thousand times anyway.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 18 points 2 years ago

Prosecution: "Is this your signature on the bottom of this document that I am now showing to the court?"

Don Jr.: "I don't recall."

Defense: "Objection, your honor. My client is blind and can't reasonably testify."

Judge: "Overruled. Mr. Trump Jr. is clearly not blind. Also, he's not your client.

Trump, on the steps: "The judge is biased against me! He won't even let my son testify to excommunicate me!"

*How I expect it to go*

[–] leftenddev@slrpnk.net 24 points 2 years ago (2 children)

"Eric is too stupid to not bring us all down"

[–] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He's an absolute wildcard. On one hand he's to stupid to do anything, on the other hand he's so stupid he could accidentally rat them all out.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Does Junior seem any smarter? He seems like he's got a real cocaine tongue, to boot.

[–] grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Who? Eric "we get all the money we need from the Russians" Trump?

[–] RubberStuntBaby@kbin.social 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He's not worried about them. He's worried that his idiot kids won't be able to lie convincingly and it will ruin his defense.

[–] Cyclist@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Because he's the best liar, no one lies better than him.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 years ago

As he calls for the prosecution of Hunter Biden for the umpteenth time.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (2 children)

He only cares because he's worried they might sell him out.

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago

Wouldn’t you?

[–] ares35@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

that won't happen. it's just for the quote the maga media can repeat all day.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

Especially the daughter he openly lusts after.

[–] Steve@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (5 children)

It always strikes me as strange when anyone refers to their 30 or 40+ year old offspring, as children. They aren't remotely children in any way.

[–] SgtScrotes@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 years ago

To me, i feel there's a difference between calling someone a child (indicating a youthful connotation) and being someone's child (a familial connotation).

My children will always be my children, but sometimes my oldest acts like a child.

If that makes any sense.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I thought the same thing until my kids became adults. It's just a parent thing.

[–] Steve@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I get that. But being their parent, and having the impulse to protect or defend them, doesn't mean it's the right thing to do.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Im not defending Trump's actions. They're plenty old enough to speak up for themselves. I'm merely saying it's not uncommon for a parent to refer to their offspring as "children" even after they're well into adulthood.

[–] kleenbhole@lemy.lol 9 points 2 years ago

Obviously you don't have kids.

[–] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Won't somebody think of his poor tykes who never did anything wrong in their life and are being maliciously attacked for no reason at all!

[–] Zippy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You can call them family but that does not specify exactly who they are. Family can refer to brother and sisters or parents as well as your children. It would be pretty common to ask an 80 year old of they have any children. Don't think it really refers to a certain age of the child.

[–] Steve@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Offspring would be the term.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

Or what? What's he going to do about it?

Also: ADULT children.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 years ago

Criminal demands accomplices be left alone.

[–] LetterboxPancake@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"Leave my children alone! The hot one and the idiot as well. Are there others? Leave them alone!"

[–] RojoSanIchiban@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Barron:

<.<

>.>

[–] Wilibus@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Second. Don't forget about the time he wanted to fuck Ivanka.