this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
850 points (99.9% liked)

politics

22912 readers
5972 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Catholic Health Initiatives-Iowa, a faith-based health care provider, is arguing in a medical malpractice case that the loss of an unborn child does not equate to the death of a “person” for the purpose of calculating damage awards.

In Iowa, court-ordered awards for noneconomic losses stemming from medical malpractice are capped at $250,000, except in cases that entail the “loss or impairment of mind or body.”

Attorneys for the CHI and MercyOne hospital are arguing the cap on damages still applies in cases where the “loss” is that of a fetus or unborn child.

CHI’s status as a nonprofit, tax-exempt entity is based on its stated mission of providing health services “in the spirit of the gospel.” The ethics guidelines it approved in 2018 state that the corporation is committed to “respect the sacredness of every human life from the moment of conception until death.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I say, let them rip what they sowed.

[–] sdfric88@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

"Reap", as in the grim reaper. You "reap" what you sow

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 2 points 8 hours ago

No!, I say Rip, not reap.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 17 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

There is zero point in ever listening to what a conservative is saying. It changes based on whatever they think is beneficial to them in that exact moment. They're like the demons from Frieren.

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 hours ago

but will they make it right in the end by giving her a new fetus (from someone who died in a fire).

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 46 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Abortion? It's a person, you murderers!

We fucked up? Well it's a fetus, not a person!

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago

Well, the problem is that "Faith Based Institutions" are exposed to any amount of liability for anything at all. Obviously, these people were infallible and it was the sinful patients who were at fault.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 36 points 20 hours ago

Those guys will say almost anything for their weekly free money.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 31 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Catholic Health Initiatives-Iowa, a faith-based health care provider

A what?

[–] CptOblivius@lemmy.world 19 points 19 hours ago

It is a left over system where hospitals were basically run by nuns and churches. Originally done in good faith as there wasn't any other option, so nuns would double as nurses, staff, etc. That is basically how Mayo clinic started. It is outdated now but many of those hospitals combined to form CHI, Dignity... Some are huge systems.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago

It's who provides medicine in America. Why do you think our media depicts healers as clerics and priests.

Fr. John gives a hell of a sermon alongside his trademark appendectomy

[–] SippyCup@feddit.nl 4 points 17 hours ago

CHI is an absolute nightmare to deal with. They will send you to collections almost immediately, they can't answer any questions about your bills, and seem to routinely fuck them up so bad I've had lawyers send them letters twice to get problems resolved.

Getting the same service from the university medical system in my area suddenly fixed all of the billing issues. Where I was paying out the ass after insurance, suddenly the patient responsibility dropped to damn near 0.

The 'Catholic' part is just a veneer. It's a for profit medical institution that's uses religious conviction as another avenue for profit.

[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 63 points 1 day ago

"Faith-based health care provider" is one of the saddest euphemisms I've heard in a while.

[–] Naevermix@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago
[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 313 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Money is far more important than principles. -Modern Christianity

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 29 points 1 day ago

"But He loves you. He loves you, and He needs money! He always needs money! He’s all-powerful, all-perfect, all-knowing, and all-wise, somehow just can’t handle money! Religion takes in billions of dollars, they pay no taxes, and they always need a little more. Now, you talk about a good bullshit story. Holy Shit!"

-George Carlin

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 78 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Historically Christianity hasn’t been much different unless you go way back.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 20 points 1 day ago

Not really. They banned priest marriage so they could stop paying pensions to widows and would inherit all their property, and throughout the Catholic existence they were selling pardons for sins.

Even the establishment of Christianity was a cash grab. They gentrified Jesus because Jews weren’t interested in this particular messiah and it was the gentiles who had the cash at the time.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Blessed are the rich and powerful, for they fill God's collection plate

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pappabosley@lemm.ee 98 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Rules for thee and not for me

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I've encountered many situations of priests having girlfriends, boyfriends and even whole ass families on the side and the parishioners were...okay with it? Like, being celibate is one of the basic prerequisites for your job and you are violating it so casually? No wonder the Catholic church is hemorraging members, this type of in-your-face hipocrisy has become commonplace.

[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemm.ee 9 points 19 hours ago

The reason behind priests not being allowed to marry originally had nothing to do with their faith though. It's because Catholic priests were bequeathing church assets to their children when they died. The church just put a thin veneer of dogma on top of the reasoning when they used the dictate of no marriage to stop the theft.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 13 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

That is an even more finicky situation. Roman Catholic priests cannot marry, but Eastern Catholic priests can, and there are exemptions that can be made for Roman Catholic converts. On top of that, you may have seen a “high church” protestant group (looks like a Catholic Church) like Anglicans who generally can marry or date.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

Yeah an Anglican priest can be indistinguishable from a catholic one except for the fact that she and her wife have kids.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

There's also the part about being backward, hateful and wrong. I don't even have to mention that one other thing but you know exactly what it is.

[–] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 117 points 1 day ago
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 166 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Hey hey now. Dont be bashful. You and your ilk has screamed that it does. In your eyes, you killed a person. You can't switch when its uncomfortable for you.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

Tells you what this is really about.

[–] SoupBrick@pawb.social 60 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Unfortunately, they can and will.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Just dig up their past statements. They've definitely said shit on abortion before, they're religious they can't help it.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 19 hours ago

Hypocrisy is a defining feature of Abrahamic religion.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 1 day ago

religion has never been about truth or consistency, it's a matter of power

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I would love to have the judge question them directly on the sanctity of human life and how it does not apply in this case but applies to abortion.

Hell, if we can get a hold of the plaintiff and ask them to lose the case so that we can build case law off of the ruling, we might be able to get the Catholic church on record as saying abortion should be legalized.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 61 points 1 day ago

I mean they cover up child rape . Totally on brand for them and most religious organizations

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 119 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Abortion is MURDER! UNLESS it Costs us MONEY in Which case Abortion is NOT MURDER!

-People who Follow the ~~10~~ ~~9~~ ~~8~~ ~~7~~ some Commandments!

[–] honeybadger1417@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago

I don't know why I'm still surprised by the hypocrisy at this point.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Now, now, the Laws of Hammurabi clearly state what to do here...

22 “If people are fighting and hit a pregnant woman and she gives birth prematurely but there is no serious injury, the offender must be fined whatever the woman’s husband demands and the court allows. 23 But if there is serious injury, you are to take life for life, 24 eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, 25 burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise.

So you will note that punishment is only given out as the woman is harmed, as this is a life. Miscarriage shmishcarriage, it's not a life yet so no harm done, no punishment given.

It's an open and shut case, Your Honour. The husband can demand all he wants but no life was harmed here, no eyes, no teeth, the $250,000 cap applies as "the court allows".

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›