this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
382 points (99.2% liked)

News

28669 readers
6634 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 24 points 5 hours ago

No kidding your honor. The question is what exactly are you or any other judge going to do about it?

I don't mean that in a Trump is right kind of way. I mean it in a this is something the judiciary needs to be seriously looking into sooner rather than later.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 134 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

This is precisely what contempt is for.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 76 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

That’s what the article states. She’s mandating two weeks of intense discovery, which will lead to contempt of court if they cannot prove they have done everything in their power to return him.

[–] stickly@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Honest question: if the administration's defense is shrugging because he's in another country, doesn't the judge have an easy layup to shut down CECOT deportations?

They can't have it both ways, either follow due process or keep your slave detention camps domestic. It's not interfering in foreign policy to point out they need to choose.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 11 points 5 hours ago

She did, with an injunction that they are continuing to defy. That’s another contempt of court charge. She has to do this slowly and methodically to prevent giving them evidence of bias when they appeal her rulings. The downside to a just court is the pace. Had we a functional Congress that wasn’t packed with loyalists, this would’ve been over by now.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 43 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

Lot of shit gon happen in a fortnight.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 34 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

I fear Trump will just ask his buddy Bukele to kill the guy, out of sheer spite.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 24 points 9 hours ago

"Way ahead of you, boss."

[–] parody 1 points 4 hours ago

Oh so you just want a president to smuggle another president into the country?

(Disingenuous ass with that BS he unloaded in the Oval the other day, pretending like he was being asked to bring Xi, Vlad, & Kim to Guantánamo)

[–] Steve@startrek.website 11 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

The death of several innocent prisoners, for example

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 7 points 9 hours ago

Like people are going to run around, building stuff and doing dances? I don't know, I don't play it...

[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

Nothing's gonna happen. Stop dreaming.

Trump is above justice and so are his billionaire goons. Justice is only for pariahs.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 12 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, why don't we all just roll over and die at their feet.

I get the sentiment but we really don't need a Debbie Downer.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

If it makes you feel any better, he's only above legal justice. There's still a sliver of hope.

[–] InversionOfControl@lemmy.world -4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

He’s speaking the facts. The sooner yall come to terms with that and plan accordingly the better.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Who is "yall" and who is you?

[–] InversionOfControl@lemmy.world -2 points 4 hours ago

You. This “geewiz Debby downer” shit lol. Yall better learn to be militant about this shit.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 7 points 8 hours ago

Maybe you replied to the wrong person? Maybe you misunderstood? When I said "shit", I meant shit.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

How can they be found in contempt when they were never out of contempt.

They don't care what judges say. The judges are just NOW finding that out?

[–] eRac 3 points 6 hours ago

In the legal system, far more things get reversed due to procedural issues than on merit. Generally, this is a good thing. A judge should not be able to hand out punishment on a whim.

As with most protections, fascists destroy the ones that limit them and cling to those that benefit them.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 18 points 7 hours ago

This guy’s already dead.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 62 points 9 hours ago (5 children)

This whole case has collapsed into a handful of choices:

  1. Judge doesn't declare the Trump admin in Contempt of Court (i.e. does nothing). This sets precedent that Trump's administration enjoys full immunity from the judiciary, officially turning the US into a dictatorship. This is what has been happening for weeks and remains by far the most likely scenario.
  2. Judge declares Trump in Contempt of Court, but is unable to enforce it. This is equivalent to scenario 1.
  3. Judge declares the Trump admin in Contempt of Court and deputizes state police to enforce the ruling and arrest, if not Trump, at least some officials. This would be legal and remains the only constitutional solution, but would almost certainly trigger an armed response from the regime. Democracy doesn't go down without a fight, but the end result is uncertain.
  4. Pro-democracy factions use illegal/violent means to force Trump to comply (military coup, sudden Luigi's Mansion remake, etc.). However it would seem that the masks fell off and despite decades of propaganda to the contrary, literally not a single living American is willing to put their life on the line to protect Democracy.
[–] JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago

The administration will just apply for an appeal to the decision - 6 months - then if it is approved it goes to a one man Supreme Court ruling (18 months), then they appeal again (12 months) and it goes to the full bench (24 months) who will declare its now outside the scope of action.

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

1a. Judge goes on a Holiday in Cambodia, so to speak, and is replaced. See option 1.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Well now I've gotta listen to some Dead Kennedys so thanks

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 9 points 9 hours ago (2 children)
  1. Admin complies
  2. Abrego suddenly ends up dead during that time. Essentially means admin would be complying.
[–] parody 1 points 4 hours ago

We have to send monitors to that prison immediately until he’s safely back home

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 11 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

There's a serious chance they'll have the guy killed to get the judge off their back without having to be seen backing down, and to show judges what happens when they try to challenge the regime on a deportation case.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Which would definitely be contempt of court when the whole thing leaks because they added another goddamned reporter to the signal conversation about it

[–] Draces@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

And then we get to watch Fox News talk about how brilliant and righteous the regime is

[–] BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Because they made the poor and uneducated afraid. That's why all the guns. Fear of that which they do not understand. They were fed endless propaganda about how Trump cares for the working class. Republican Corporate media let them keep their guns as long as they had an enemy to point them at that wasn't them. Keep them scared and afraid of their allies, their fellow working class.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 0 points 5 hours ago
  1. Dude's dead and has been
[–] KMAMURI@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Wake up. Your courts haven't been able to help you long before the cheeto was in power and was flaunting his many felonies. The courts literally gave him unlimited power already. There have been zero repercussions for him his entire life while you all cheered him on and brought him to power not once but twice.

[–] parody 3 points 4 hours ago
[–] Zippygutterslug@lemmy.world 36 points 9 hours ago

They obviously aren't, and have defied every court at every turn when presented with lawful orders in this matter.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 11 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Court: issues order

Trump Admin: flat out says they will not follow the orders

Court: I don't think the admin is following my orders.

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 20 points 9 hours ago

I’ve got an idea! Let’s sit around jerking each other off for two weeks while we build a case that Trump will just ignore anyways! Who’s with me (besides the Court)???

[–] natecox@programming.dev 13 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Doesn't matter, they'll ignore that too.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago

They need to have the bailiff already standing behind the regime lawyers right when it's declared.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 13 points 9 hours ago
[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago

Give them two weeks to do something. We'll see, then what if they don't provide? Another 2 weeks? They will just say he is dead or died in transit and it's out of their hands. Then what happens? Let me guess.

Fucking nothing.

[–] Cocopanda@futurology.today 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

the courts need to form a militaristic arm to carry out their needs.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

They have the Marshals, and the judge could indeed order a government official arrested.

[–] themadcodger@kbin.earth 2 points 2 hours ago

In sane times, yes. But US Marshals are a part of the Dept of Justice, which answers to the Executive. So I'll let you guess how that would play out if they were ordered to arrest Trump or anyone else in his circle.

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 4 points 9 hours ago

The Orange Turd is a criminal. I would expect nothing less from him.