I don't care, I post when I have something to say.
this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
92 points (95.1% liked)
Ask Lemmy
31148 readers
3226 users here now
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I don’t understand why people would find it rude/incorrect
God knows there aren't many new threads on lemmy so I've been searching random keywords looking for interesting old threads to read and sometimes comment on.
Quite a few of us sort by “New Comments”. Posting to an old thread can help breathe new life into it, especially if you have something new to add to the conversation.
I'd never seen that feature. I'm gonna try it out now
I hope we have threads stay alive for years
If the thread is still relevant - post away!
this was how it worked on forums back in the day, no? i see it as a revival of a good thing
I love notifications about replies to the old stuff as it means that the internet has slowed down and new and shining isn't as appealing as old stuff.
I do too! I mean notifications of replies are always a shot of dopamine no matter how old.
That reminds me there's this dude who replied to a pic I posted with "Can use this as an album cover?" I said sure and he said "Cool see me in a year". I replied a year later "How's that album coming along?" and was like "give me another year" lol. It's almost been two years now. Gonna check in again soon.
It is a holdover from the old forum days when adding a comment would pop a thread to the top of the front page, so someone going through and commenting on multiple old posts would flood the front page with outdated discussions. Generally those people would also post worthless comments, like 'Thanks', that didn't add anything.
Now that we have more ways to sort the underlying problem is no longer relevant, but some people still hold on to that mindset. Some people who weren't around for the older forums may have caught the disdain from others, or could even just have it in their minds that discussions always have limited time frames for whatever reason.
I don't care unless someone relies to my comment to continue some stupid argument they started four months ago.
Oh I didn't know that! I didn't grow up on forums but I used them a few times here and there. You're right new replies do push a thread to the top. Kind of a bad design lol.
It was a great design when the intent was to make new discussion visible. It was great for reviving threads when new and prodictive discussion was added!
Like any design, there will be cases where it doesn't work as intended. It is hard to design around people adding non-productive comments.
Fair point
There's only one forum I visit nowadays and it gets older threads revived every now and then. Usually to say "Whatever happened to that? Is it done yet?"
Thanks.
Depends on the type of community, forums it's potentially disruptive since it bumps it to the top. Redsit/Lemmy style it matters less.
I certainly would advocate against archiving Lemmy posts in a way that "locks" them, I can't tell you how many times an old reddit post shows up in a search result and helpful newer replies with the most recent information is still getting added sporadically.
We had the opportunity to do something really funny, here
You still can if you come back in 5 years
The wording had initially confused me.
I thought this was about posts that got no comments, not about necro'ing posts.
Honestly, I think necro'ing posts is really only a problem when your forum software doesn't have many options for sorting the feed. Lemmy is more advanced; if you don't like necro'd posts, then just don't sort by recent activity.
Not if we keep this thread alive.
In memory of the lost ones: *Bump
I get comments on months old posts, I'm fine with it since it will help future users
If the person is looking for a discussion (ex. They need help with the software I posted about), then it's usually better they make a new post
If it's a question that has no answer (or no useful answer) it's totally fine to comment with an answer.
I figure that someone will eventually stumble across the same thread that I did if they have a similar question. Might as well contribute and share some knowledge.
My favorite was a specific problem I had modding Morrowind on Linux years ago and posting to reddit.
Only for years to pass and I search for the same problem, only to find my own damn post with no replies.
I never understood the taboo.
It's a holdover from old BBS forum style.
When you reply to an ancient thread, it immediately gets pushed to the top of the board. Now everyone basically is wondering what this 5 year old topic is doing on the first page. And they might have to read through several pages of messages to understand what the hell the newest reply is about because nobody remembers the topic in the first place.
With Reddit/Lemmy, the upvote system means it really doesn't matter at all if you reply to an ancient thread, it won't jump to the front page for anyone.
yes it will for those who (like me) are sorting by "new comments"
But you know what you're getting into, then, so it's not confusing or a problem.
Ah yes, that would have been annoying. I started in the era of small web forums where activity was split out from recency by page or dialog.
Me neither, but someone commented here it's a holdover from the days of forums where a new reply to an old thread would instantly put that thread at the top of the forums because the order was always latest reply. This was found annoying by some people especially if the new reply was short and meaningless or something. Makes more sense to me now.
do whatever you want, who's going to stop you the thread police?
I think people call it deadposting. I've heard someone be like "Sorry for deadposting" so I thought if they're apologizing it must be frowned upon.
Someone made a rude comment to me because I was looking for information regarding an interest. No one else replied. I shook it off and kept looking.
Perfectly fine. Bumps don't do what they used to do in messageboard/BBS contexts, so if you have something useful/clever/funny to say in a dead thread I say go for it.
Heck, sometimes it can prompt a follow-up when someone says "You know, I should do [x related to topic]" after some time has passed, which is fun.
If I come across a post and I have something significant enough to comment, I leave it regardless of age. But I don’t think I’m ever going to see anything more than a few days old with how I browse.
If it's relevant for future people who found the thread the same way I did, sure. It's like of you were looking for a treasure in a network of caves, and you see writing in the wall from previous treasure seekers saying "beware of bats." If I add "left cave has dragon" it might help someone else.
Also, if the OP or other accounts are still active, they might get still a notification.
If it provides me information I need... I'll thank the poster.
I've commented a thank you a literal decade after the helpful comment was made.
When I was on reddit... If the thread was archived, I'd copy the link and send the person a message saying thanks. If it was very helpful.
I don't have a problem with it obviously. Back in the day being a thread necromancer was frowned upon. Now, it doesn't bump the thread to the top of the forum, so who cares
load more comments
(4 replies)
Depends on what the thread was about. If it's a technical thread, and if you have something to contribute that might help someone in the future with that issure, go ahead. Most of the rest of the time, it's just bad form.
Even on reddit I'd get replies to years old comments. I remember one user watching Breaking Bad and reading the old response threads and engaging with me from there.
I don't mind at all, especially as I'm trying to be uplifting with my comments.
I'll let you know in a year.
RemindMe! 1000 years
That which is dead can never die.
I mean... Sometimes it's weird, but sometimes it's not. Depends on what the thread is about and how long it's been, I guess.
Generally speaking, if the thread isn't "time-sensitive," if you want to reply, just reply. That's my take.
I acknowledge it. I preface my post with something, usually /rezz or I'll comment "I know this is old but..."
The older the thread the funnier necroing is. If the forums I was on in middle school were still around you can bet I'd be bumping some of those threads just for teh lulz.
I have had threads on reddit that were well over 5 years old get comments. I'm not upset, but I am questioning how you ended up so deep in the past + what the hell past me was thinking.
view more: next ›