this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
879 points (95.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

7454 readers
3492 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SSNs4evr@leminal.space 1 points 7 minutes ago

There's also the "all Disnied out" class who doesn't want to waste any more money buying tickets to stand in line at "The Evil Empire."

[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago

This implies we all want to go to disney as if it is the ultimate goal to work towards. I'd rather go to the ZOO.

[–] Awesomo85@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have friends that used to go to Disney 2-3 times a year. They did not live in Florida. They used to spend so much money to go multiple times a year.

They are now declaring bankruptcy.

Going to Disney is just keeping up with the Joneses.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It is not just Disney, vacations in general for a family are very expensive but a lot of people are doing them. Granted some of thwm prolly have the money but I bet most don't but they do it.

I don't understand why people obsess over vacations so much. Such a weird "consumer" behaviour

[–] Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

I don't understand why people obsess over vacations

Maybe in this case where the "vacation" is just going to Disney and buying Disney themed stuff, but do you really not get the idea of a vacation in general?

I feel like (based on my experiences and talking to other people) is vacations are more for new experiences, new food, new cultures, new people. Not just "consumer behaviors".

[–] Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee 3 points 27 minutes ago

vacations are more for new experiences, new food, new cultures, new people. Not just “consumer behaviors”.

This. I haven't gone to multiple countries in latin america for weeks to just buy shit. The food in lima is some of the best i've ever had, just don't go alone for safety :P

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 57 minutes ago (3 children)

My position is that tourism is cancer especially the modern version where you have idiots going to tourism traps to experience

new food, new cultures, new people.

Which is literally just "consumer behaviors"

Most historic urban cores are fucking gutten from obnoxious behaviour and these places unlivable and devoid of any culture beyond architectural style.

Alternative are cruises and resorts... Which are prolly less damaging to the cities... But what fucking culture is there

[–] vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 minutes ago

The only types of vacations you can imagine are visiting historic urban cores, going on a cruise, or going to a resort?

What about a camping trip? Or a beach trip? Or visiting family that lives far away?

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 minutes ago

I don't think that wanting to experience other cultures is a consumerist behavior.

[–] MemeSink@reddthat.com 2 points 16 minutes ago (1 children)

Agreed. People claim flying halfway across the planet exposes them to "different cultures" , but then do the most homegenized, Westernized touristy activities. I can learn more about a country and it's culture in a single day via Wikipedia and documentaries than most tourists will gain on their "vacation" in same country.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 11 minutes ago

Eat pray love is what they are going for...

Hard rock cafe is where they end up

Haha

Then they make travel their personality on online dating apps!

[–] vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 12 minutes ago

I mean, I guess that depends on what you're defining as a "vacation". If you're talking about some big grand trip where you spend a ton of money and show off to everyone when you get back, sure.

But that's not my experience with vacations, nor most people I know. A vacation is a break. It's a chance to change your daily routine, change your scenery, and just disconnect from the normal stresses of daily life for a bit. It doesn't need to be somewhere expensive or even far away. Hell, a weekend camping trip can cost virtually nothing and is a great vacation.

And for kids, vacations can be a great bonding and learning experience with parents and siblings. It takes them out of their comfort zone and forces them to experience and try things they might not have otherwise, simply because their environment has changed. Again, it doesn't need to be something grand or expensive. Just something different.

Vacations aren't just "consumer" behavior. They're pretty important in a lot of ways.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 3 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Because it's like a way to pay to maximize your time off

Staycations are way more relaxing, but are generally forgettable - a week can go by before you know it when you're just at home

A week in a different place where you cram in as many activities and experiences in as possible creates far more memories, so it feels longer

It's like retail therapy - a way to soothe that voice in the back of your head asking "is it really worth it to sell my life away like this?"

[–] vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 minutes ago

I think you've been vacationing wrong.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 minute ago

I like vacations that are a mix of your two descriptions: Go somewhere new, but with zero itinerary. I have the most fun that way, just organically figuring out stuff to do. Of course, still do some research ahead of time.

[–] OmnislashIsACloudApp@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

+4. rents out the entire park for an exclusive vacations

[–] whome@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AidsKitty@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I went to Disney once and I have to say I was not impressed. I mean once you went and saw it why would you go back?

[–] JandroDelSol@lemmy.world 1 points 57 minutes ago

I mean, the rides are pretty fun, and I could probably spend an entire week in Epcot, but it's definitely more of an every few years thing rather than multiple times a year.

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 2 points 22 hours ago

They get new rides, new installments, new exclusive merch, etc., but you’re right for the most part.

[–] BreadAndThread@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Same. I went about 25 years ago when my kids were little, and I still think it's too soon to go back.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I don't think this works. I know DINKs and single people who work normal jobs (and a shitload of overtime) and go to Disney like six times a year because they're total Disney freaks. Like, adult Disney people who get Disney tattoos and shit. It's a whole vibe.

[–] phar@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

No kids and they choose to go to Disney? You could go to any number of foreign cities or beautiful beaches and they choose Disney? Wtf?

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Why go to any number of foreign cities when you can visit everything in Epcot?

/s

[–] JDPoZ@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Literally what someone I knew said one time when I criticized them for going to Disney a bajillionth time instead of literally anywhere else in the world.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago

And there I was debating whether or not an \s was really needed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago (6 children)

DINKs are already an entirely separate class tbh.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

Eh, this doesn't quite hold up. Grandparents are retired boomers in Florida so you get to go all summer, but your parents are living paycheck to paycheck.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 256 points 1 day ago (16 children)

Fuck this noise. The only classes that matter are the people who are rich enough to own Disneyland, and everyone else. Quibbling over whose shit sandwich is bigger is just dividibg ourselves for their benefit.

[–] jaxxed@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

This.

50% of the economy in the US is controlled by the "Whenever the fuck I want" class.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 77 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, but give a man a bank, and he can rob the world.”

― Jim Trotter

[–] MissingInteger@lemm.ee 6 points 22 hours ago

This is being attributed to Jim Trotter, but I can't find a source for this claim. I can't even find when he is supposed to have said it…
It was definitely said in Mr. Robot (2015), and it was definitely not said in the movie The Skulls (2000), no one in that entire movie ever says "bank", despite what some people on reddit claim.

According to this blog post, the oldest tweet is from 28 Nov 2011 @Bonoboism.

Maybe someone else can find a better source.

Note: I'm linking only to archives, not to either reddit or xitter.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The amazing thing to me is that Disney used to be cheap entertainment. 1955 admission was $1.10 with rides costing 10 to 35 cents. A teenager could take a date there for what they'd earn in an afternoon. Prices for movies, sporting events, and concerts were similar.

[–] Robbity@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This is known as the cost disease. As manufacturing gets increasingly optimized, automated and cheap, the share of income that needs to be spent on everything else increases. For example, housing and services like live entertainment or healthcare.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

cost disease. I never heard of this before.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baumol_effect

[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

My Uncle and his family are like this, his kids are adults now and they still go to Disney every year.

We're Canadian. and he is a staunch opponent of the Canadian Healthcare system, He believes that because he can personally throw money at a Doctor, that everyone should be treated that way, first paid first served.

[–] thingAmaBob@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not accurate. Plenty of broke people go to Disney regularly. I know a couple of them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FreshLight@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

Fuck Disney, fuck dividing the non-super rich

There should be another Disney class. The “Lightning Pass/Stayed at a Disney Resort/going to multiple parks over several days” Class

The park fees alone are pretty expensive if you’d like to see more than just “Disneyland” and want to see EPCOT, Studios, etc. The try to ride the rides during any popular season you buy Lightning Passes for hundreds or even a thousand more per person, pay for parking over multiple days, stay at an expensive “resort” property…

Yeah. You can go “cheap” and stay off property, but it’s a whole different experience.

load more comments
view more: next ›