this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2025
533 points (98.7% liked)

News

29029 readers
4072 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Retailers vs trump. Let them kill each other imo.

I'm checking out. America is going to fuck itself to death and I'm tired of pretending like I care about any of these people.

[–] guyoverthere123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

So what? He's not going to care and 2/3 of the electorate in the United States chose Trump.

FYI, those who didn't vote chose Trump as much as the people who voted for Trump

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 6 points 17 hours ago

Worth noting that a BUNCH of votes got disqualified thanks to distributed, local efforts by Republicans, and the effort was targeted. The article I read pointed out that black people got their votes tossed 900% more often than white people, for example.

[–] michel@lemmy.ml 3 points 16 hours ago

Trump didn't even get a majority of the popular vote - you might be thinking of the electoral college, which skewed the result by overweighting sparsely populated deep red states

https://www.fec.gov/resources/cms-content/documents/2024presgeresults.pdf

[–] AngrySquirrel@lemm.ee 51 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Why would the supreme leader care? He doesn't even know what groceries are.

[–] KMAMURI@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

You don't need stupid groceries when you have amphetamines and hamburders

[–] turnip@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Groceries, such an old word. Groceries.. Grooooceries.

[–] BleatingZombie@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I think you mean McDonald's

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 29 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I'm all for a "Hot Tariff Summer." Let the shelves be mostly empty, with everything else tripling in price.

Even MAGAs will feel the pain, and they'll know it is all HitlerPig's fault. Once they start questioning him even a little bit, it's the beginning of the end for him.

His approval ratings are already underwater, and dropping. Let him have his way for a while, and his virtuosic incompetence will do more to reduce his support than anything the Resistance can do.

[–] guyoverthere123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Magas won't know it was hitlerpigs fault because Fox News and Newsmax will tell them it's some leftwing conspiracy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Then what? Best hope is a Blue wave in 2026, impeachment, then removal. Dont think that's happening sadly. We got 3 more years

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 5 points 23 hours ago

I would agree, if all things remained the same, but allowing his Tariff Economy to stretch its legs, and make the MAGAs and Corporations feel extreme pain, will change the playing field, and alienate many people who were past supporters. If Republican constituents are screaming at their Senators, maybe a significant number will finally decide that enough is enough.

Of course, impeachment/ removal would be a somewhat unsatisfying result, as it would only put Vance in the driver's seat, and psycopath Peter Theil keeps him on a very tight leash. We would be at Theil's mercy, and he has well established that he has none.

[–] Treetrimmer@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Mainstream Dems don't have the balls to do that

[–] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Mainstream Dems already impeached him twice. It did shit all to end his first presidency or prevent a second one. It's a worthless step, obviously.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blinx615@lemmy.ml 3 points 20 hours ago

Surely this bankrupts dollar general

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Related question- how much did Walmart and Target donate to the trump campaign and/or “inauguration fund?”

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And the triple hit of inflation due to tariffs, reduced offer and of course speculation

Muricans are about to get tired of all the winning they voted for

[–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also the bond route. Argentina style economic policies.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

well Argentina has a horrific track record so tRump probably loves it

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 189 points 1 day ago (6 children)

The sun is 8 light-minutes away from the Earth - meaning if it were to disappear the sun would still shine in the sky for 8 minutes after it had vanished.

It takes 30 days for Chinese cargo ships to reach the U.S. from China.

'Liberation day' was 24 days ago.

[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 43 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That and there are second-order effects. If your business ordered a bunch of shit prior to all of this, and it's now coming into port you may say "fuck it, send it back" or you may decide to accept it, eat the tariff, and preemptively increase your pricing on your future finished landed goods because you are now having to factor in pricing instability of the input components/materials.

Likewise, during the several months period of fluctuation, many businesses likely made a reasoned decision to stop ordering for the future because they don't know if the market will tolerate them having to increase their prices by that much and they can't afford to sit on inventory they will never sell. So even if the government declares "ha just kidding" and completely abandons tariffs today, there could be a period of 2-5 months where many products aren't available because industries paused proactive ordering based on projected demand.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Another second or third order effect, depending on exactly how you class it:

Lots of smaller, more specific product segment oriented businesses?

Well, the smart ones ordered a bunch of supply at the end of last year or beginning of this year.

Which means their smaller ware and storehouses are fuller than normal.

Which means they... assumed demand would more or less remain steady.

Which means they took a big expense some months ago, maybe covered it with a loan.

Which means the Q4 24 and Q1 25 quarters are actually pulling forward from the rest of the year, which means we will actually GDP fall from... the baseline prior to that, not after that.

... And ~~if~~ when the economy generally tanks, and demand falls through the floor...

Well, some of them will survive.

But many won't.

Even though they did the arguably smarter thing, they'll still have to cut hours, do lay offs, even though the bosses told their workers that they didn't get a Xmas bonus... so that they wouldn't have to lay them off or cut their hours.

...

Beyond that, remember when the Ever Given got stuck in the Suez?

And... if you knew anyone in logistics... shit was back ordered and fucked up and people were paying premiuma for priority shipping that was still late, and dock processing times and land tranait schedules were fucked because everyone kept changing plans last minute?

Oh just multiply that level of chaos by 100 or 1000 or so.

Nbd rofl.

...

... As someone with a basic Econ degree, I always find it hilarious how often the highly praised and glorified 'small business owner'... is actually pretty much ignorant of most basic economics.

What is it, 95% or 99% of small businesses fail within the first year? Just like how 99% of Youtubers or Tiktokers or OnlyFans people make essentially no money?

Nobody bothers to look into any of that though, oh well.

At least succesful Youtubers / streamers are generally aware of the fact they've won the lottery.

Small business owners on the other hand are usually the most self righteous ass hats I ever meet: We're a ~~abusive~~ family business!

(though there are of course exceptions to that)

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

Always good to read something by someone who actually understands how business works.

[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The consequences are coming soon.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

aheheh...

Coming Soon!

Watch This Space!

sped up timelapse shot of giant billboard decaying

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 120 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Upon seeing the empty shelves Conservatives will say "this is what life is like under communism" without a shred of irony.

[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They did that last time Trump was in office lol, I distinctly remember a post exactly like that

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

IIRC:

It was an aerial, or highly elevated shot of an extremely wealth district of high rise apartments and condos in... Brazil I think?

Seperated by a giant fence with a favela on the other side.

And then labelled something to the effect of 'this is your brain on communism' or whatever.

EDIT: Something like this, I think:

Rio de Janiero.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 14 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The funny thing is you can see exactly this type of separation in the US it just is usually separated by a free way rather than a fence. East and West Highland in San Bernardino comes to mind.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The entire history of the phrase 'wrong side of the tracks' also comes to mind.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I was actually going to use an example of train tracks but decided not to, mostly because explaining that a long dead woman had a superiority complex cause she lived on the south side of the tracks was a bit pointless even for me.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, I'd appreciate it!

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Basically my grandmother had a great aunt who constantly bragged about living in South Redlands and would not shut the fuck up about it. She had a severely unbearable superiority complex in a German-American family where every member had a severe superiority complex, also she stole a tonne of shit when my 2x great grandparents passed because everyone was out for dinner after the funeral.

The funny thing is according to my grandmother this aunt was toothless, talked like white trash, and lived in a shack but because she lived in South Redlands that meant she was better.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

That sounds very much like certain white trash family members in my family/extended family, and family of neighbor kids I grew up with.

Utterly shit people who have objectively fucked up or failed at nearly every opportunity ever presented to them, never seek out or attempt to create their own opportunities... but also somehow just infinitely smug and self confident about basically just random unremarkable nonsense details of their lives.

And of course, are never wrong about anything and are literally incapable of genuine introspection.

[–] BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago

They knew this was possible last summer, but they took the gamble. Sometimes you lose.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 68 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Just in Time shipping strikes again

Can't wait until Christmas

[–] blakenong 54 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe we need empty shelves for a while.

[–] ArgentRaven@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Kind of like how COVID reset our expectations on everything. Bare shelves at Christmas might reset what we really need to buy.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Just in Time shipping and manufacturing only serves one purpose, making quarterly reports look good. Managers and equity firms LOVE JiT because keeping inventory on hand doesn't balance well on their spreadsheets. They can not quantify inventory getting used over the course of a few years because they can't see past the next quarter. To them, it's lost profit; even if it doesn't lose its value and is all but guaranteed to get used/sold eventually.

You would think more companies would have learned the merits of Just in Case manufacturing. Those that did absolutely thrived under COVID as they were the only ones still able to produce.

But no. The COVID crisis "ended" and companies went "Well something like that will certainly never happen again! Back to the old ways!"

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Conservatives (and businesses are generally conservative) are great at deluding themselves into adopting any strategy that puts money in their pocket over intelligent strategies that would lead to better long-term outcomes, but cost a little more and/or make slightly less profit.

That's why they stick with Trickle Down Economics, which have poor long-term outcomes for all but the rich, instead of Trickle Up Economics, which helps everyone, even though the inevitable outcome of Trickle Down is a catastrophic shift (for the rich) to Robin Hood Economics (Take from the rich, Give to the poor).

[–] immutable@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s extremely interesting to watch them give trump leeway here. I saw polling recently that many of the trump faithful believe that the tariffs will bring short term pain but it will be worth it for the long term benefits.

What’s going to turbo suck is that they will take the exact wrong lesson from this. It will enforce their short term thinking because they will remember this time that they experienced short term pain for long term gain and the gain never materialized.

I just wish we had the ability as a society to have a more nuanced conversation than sound bites. Ok we disagree about tariffs, one side thinks they are real fucking dumb and the other thinks they are great and will have long term benefits. It would be amazing if we could have an adult conversation about this, how it’s expected to work, how likely that is, what issues might be in the way, etc.

Perhaps it’s decades of being an engineer, but I propose designs that are meant to achieve goals and other engineers check my work, ask questions about things I might not have considered, help play out scenarios that aren’t accounted for and at the end of that we have a better design. As a nation we now seem so incapable of having an honest dialogue between the two major parties that not only are we advancing ideas that obviously won’t work but it’s clear we have no feedback mechanisms to correct course. So now we will just blow up the economy because a group of people think it might, somehow, using mechanisms no one can identify, lead to a future that is “better” where no one can meaningfully define “better.”

And that’s the state of discourse.

[–] cyphear@lemm.ee 1 points 18 hours ago

But that would mean questioning the authority of the government and providing verifiable facts. The regime we currently have doesn't want the betterment of society. They want mindless puppets who will go along with whatever is presented. Historically, people who question authoritative policies are labeled as traitors and enemies of the state, and are silenced so that the poison they spout can't spread. Fact-checking is now seen as personal attacks and are met with imprisonment and are downplayed, if covered at all.

[–] MunkysUnkEnz0@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Where are our trump did that stickers.

[–] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 1 day ago

On the shelves of chinese warehouses, due to his tariffs.

[–] jasonwnclife@lemm.ee 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Could??? It will 100% and we (US residents) are all about to have to deal with the the consequences of electing an idiot as our president.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›