this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
457 points (98.7% liked)

politics

23680 readers
2584 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Consider he can't handle to NOT voting for another fascist cabinet member, yeah, screw this ineffective asshole.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 162 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Schumer is a deer in the headlights at this point. If we’re being generous, he’s useless. If we’re being honest, he’s a fascist enabler. And fascist enablers are fascists with extra steps.

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

I’m going to say something controversial to some of us: It’s because Jewish people are the fascists this time around. Israel is a militarized police and tech surveillance state whose leader will be ousted if the war stops so he went on the offensive. Chuck is receiving money from AIPAC and doesn’t want the campaign cash to stop so he’s looking the other way while the fascists take over.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 70 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Zionists to be specific. It’s not all Jewish people.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 60 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Every Jewish person I know is opposed to aid for Israel, supporting their genocide and very vocally supportive of Gaza/palestine and very critical of Israel-the-country

It’s not that he’s Jewish. He’s just a prick.

[–] SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world 47 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

As a Palestinian I keep feeling the need to bring up that we have no issues what-so-ever with Judaism or people of Jewish faith. But I hate Zionism to my core, and I strongly commend Jewish people against Israel. Please personally thank your Jewish friends for making a choice

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

It's telling how people in the imperial core generally can't distinguish between judaism and zionism. That's how deeply ingrained the indoctrination and propaganda goes. The widespread conflation of judaism and zionism is a completely normalized form of anti-semitism.

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The widespread conflation of judaism and zionism is a completely normalized form of anti-semitism.

And it is intentionally pushed by Israeli PACs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I'll pass it along, but I can tell you they're going to be a bit confused and say "it's just the bare minimum," or "it's just the right thing to do."

(that was their response when I expressed my own gratitude and appreciation.)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 month ago

Zionists are the fascists, not Jewish people.

[–] ToadOfHypnosis@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago

Elections need to be publicly funded. Money in politics is the source of America’s decline.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 3 points 4 weeks ago

Trump's a goy. So's Vance. A lot of the white nationalist MAGAts would be happy to murder Jews if they got the chance.

Likud's influence on both Dems and Republicans is indeed pernicious, but it's money in politics and the peddling of foreign influence that are the underlying problems, not Jewish people.

[–] BigxRedxHusker@midwest.social 20 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Schumer Pelosi and Warren need to retire or be voted out.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 month ago

This is Hakeem Jeffries erasure.

See also: Durbin, Cuellar, Clyburn, Hoyer, the entire Blue Dog Coalition, King, Coons, Klobuchar, Tester, Rosen, Hassan, Peters, to just name a few of the feckless Dems (and one independent Senator who caucuses with Dems but often votes with the fascists) who still value "bipartisanship" over the wellbeing of the people they're pretending to represent.

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] BigxRedxHusker@midwest.social 9 points 4 weeks ago

She's useless, all Dem leadership is

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 47 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

“Polls come and go. Our party is united. We’re on our front foot, we’re stepping forward, going after Trump and having real success,” Schumer insisted.

Nothing said here reflects reality.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 26 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

We’re on our front foot

He's on his ass ... which is remarkable since he's talking out of it at the same time.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 4 weeks ago

That piece of shit was coming here on his stupid book tour. Friend and I had plans to go challenge him before he cancelled when he realized he's unpopular. Schedule a new tour, Chucky. We're dying to see you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 weeks ago

Christ if this is success, what does failure look like

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 1 month ago

People like him are the reason why the Democrats dont truly qualify in my eyes as an opposition party.

[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 36 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

He's not struggling to meet the moment, he's struggling to hold his own party down. Make no mistake, that traitorous bastard is a collaborationist Vichy-Democrat, a blue-dog-Republican snake. He wants as little to be done about the exploitation of the nation as possible, so he and his doners can reap the rewards.

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 15 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Please primary all these dinosaurs, they were old when I was still young. I don't know your process but please get more progressives in the house and send this current batch out to pasture

[–] michel@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 weeks ago

Schumer’s seat is only up in 2028 but if enough of his allies - preferably in safe seats - get primaried in 26 and the new progressives hold them in the general election (and hopefully win some back from GOP) I expect he will be forced out of leadership for the next Congress

It has to have enough shift to progressives or else he will take credit and stay on. He will also be ousted if Democrats lose again but in that scenario MAGA will continue unchecked for 2 more years at least

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

he and his doners

Please leave kebabs out of this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 34 points 4 weeks ago

"Struggles" is being generous. He is intentionally not fighting. The elderly leadership and all the AIPAC loyalists within the party major road blocks to any form of fighting back.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 30 points 4 weeks ago

I have despised this craven, insipid, spineless weenie ever since he collaborated with a clumsy Republican smear campaign to ruin Al Franken's career.

Since then, he has been ineffective at best, and has been a cowardly collaborator at worst. It's time for this loser to be removed from office, let AOC take his place, and be replaced as Senate Minority Leader by someone bold enough to go toe-to-toe with the MAGA Nazis.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 month ago

Good job New York. Keep electing this geriatric dust collector.

[–] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 21 points 4 weeks ago

"Struggles" doing Atlas level lifting here.

[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not ‘struggles’, simply ‘fails’

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 weeks ago

Still too generous; "fails" implies that he even tried

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 4 weeks ago

There's no struggle. Dude has always been fash.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 17 points 4 weeks ago

Chuck Schumer Struggles to Meet the Moment as Tuesday Unexpectedly on Calendar Once Again.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 10 points 4 weeks ago

More like coward sell out shows his true intentions.

[–] ceph@lemmy.world 8 points 4 weeks ago

JESUS CHRIST! Get these old, ineffective fucking fogeys out.

[–] Fourth@mander.xyz 8 points 4 weeks ago

He cannot meet the moment.

[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago

Chuck is an absolute fucking loser.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago

As an old white guy, I’m really tired of old white guys.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 6 points 4 weeks ago

Off ya fuck, Chuck.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

It’s not him. Make room for the new blood.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago
[–] 4grams@awful.systems 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Why is nobody sending him a series of strongly worded questions!?!

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 6 points 4 weeks ago

They are though. He's done, he knows it, but he won't leave and it takes time to force powerful old men to retire.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Chuck Schumer is running the bet that the GOP will implode before the whole country goes up in flames.

It's solely a hedge to save his party and capture as much power as possible.

Maybe it works but it was never for you. Unless you believe the democrats are actually "elites" that deserve to be in charge.

Personally, I think their time has come and gone and it's a crying shame they were never once put together well enough to do something for those that come after.

load more comments
view more: next ›