So every hundred years or so.
this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
824 points (99.5% liked)
Political Memes
7989 readers
2815 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Just the idiotic part of our society. That's more or less a third...
Friendly reminder that the rich love recessions. It's their intent to cause one.
That's when they amass greater property and wealth.
Wealth inequality always worsend following recessions.
There's always a logical point where making more money becomes less efficient than making other people poorer.
$s never decrease - they just circulate… if nobody you know has any, and the tv is saying nobody like you has any, someone else has them
(kinda)
Not at all, that's what neoliberalism wants you to believe. The government creates (by printing) and destroys (by taxing) money as wants
If only there were some way to record previous events, and then maybe (just maybe) have people learn this in a structured environment where they are allowed to ask questions. 🧐
For those that don't get the joke here...
This is an iconic scene that is intentionally designed to portray a very, very boring lecture from a teacher, which none of the kids want to pay attention to, that they are right to percieve this as boredom-torture.
The motherfucking actual literal topic of the lecture is how the Smoot Hawley tariffs of the 1930s massively worsened the Great Depression.
... god, Damnit.
Voodoo Economics
Movie: Ferris Bueller's Day Off
Actor: former Nixon speech writer Ben Stein
Anyone...anyone..
But that would be... an academic pursuit!!! Oh the horror!! Can't have the unwashed masses being all 'edumacated' and questioning authority!
well obviously! education turns people woke!
The unwashed masses choose to remain unwashed.
Yes, a lot of them do. But quite a few others are having their critical thinking skills and understanding of the world deliberately starved by conniving politicians (usually in red states) who want to keep them as dumb as possible.
I'm sorry but if you're a dumb adult in 2025 and you don't have a physiological impairment that's on you. There's more free educational information on the internet today than you could find in the library at Harvard or Princeton 50 years ago. Choosing not to look at any of it isn't someone else's fault no matter how much they may benefit from you continuing on in your dumb ways.
That has to be the stupidest, most ignorant, and outright idiotic things I’ve ever read on the internet. Ironic.
Found one of the dumb ones
Time to hose them down against their will then. They stink too much!
I believe that is now called "DEI"
You mean social media?
load more comments
(1 replies)
Sure, bad things have happened every time we’ve tried tariffs.
But we have to do something to balance the budget!
The federal government has achieved fiscal balance (even surpluses) in just seven periods since 1776, bringing in enough revenue to cover all of its spending during 1817-21, 1823-36, 1852-57, 1867-73, 1880-93, 1920-30 and 1998-2001. We have also experienced six depressions. They began in 1819, 1837, 1857, 1873, 1893 and 1929.
So old Billy Clinton was the only president to balance the budget without causing a depression? Interesting.
Its the economy, stupid.
The one exception occurred in the late 1990s and early 2000s, when the dot-com and housing bubbles fueled a consumption binge that delayed the harmful effects of the Clinton surpluses until the Great Recession of 2007-09.
I'd say this is basically just the result of neoliberalism, something Clinton contributed to, but not Clinton alone.
It was very much a bipartisan economic policy that started from Carter, put on overdrive with Reagan, and continued into our economic policies today.
Heh, you can't primarily blame Clinton for the thing that W had 8 years to fix. Have you watched The Big Short?
Oh, no problem then! The AI bubble will carry us through far enough until it all comes crashing down in... I want to say 2027?
Yes... The AI bubble. Which is definitely still a thing. Definitely.
- tugs nervously at collar *
Hey they can always do a war again to get that sweet Keynesian macro economics flowing.
If there is a WWIII, I doubt America will be left alone as much as it was the last two times, especially since that led to America becoming the economic powerhouse it became.
And here I thought The Great Depression started in 1929. I'm not saying tariffs in 1930 didn't make it worse, but they didn't cause it.
I would say that the Tarrifs are a further attack on the working class as they were back then. Another tool to consolidate capital.
The largest difference today is the financialization of our economy (basically meaning every company runs like a bank). This had been a method of consistently allowing the contradictions of capitalism to be delayed and passed off through layoffs and stock buybacks to further sustain the bubble of this system.
It's almost impressive at how well capitalism has adapted throughout the centuries to suck more and more away from the working class before it has to deal with a potential revolutionary "breaking point". It's definitely something Marx could have never predicted.
TLDR: I would not say that tarrifs are the cause of either of these events. I would say they are a tool of the ruling class to be used in times that capitalism hits a crisis. The cause is capitalisms contradictions itself. These extreme tarrifs are just a tool to attempt to deal with those contradictions.
Yeah unregulated capitalist economy did that. Good thing we didn't deregulate the economy since then though.
/s
2008 happened for the exact same reasons as 1929, because some of the protections put in place because of 1929 had been rolled back many years before. It wasn't as deeply bad because (dare I say) the US had a reasonable executive branch very shortly after.
But none of those protections were reimplemented. Credit default swaps are still totally a thing, for example.
CDS markets are also, currently, right now, freaking the fuck out rofl.
Ive been saying this since Trump announced his tariff / deportation policies before he got elected:
Great Depression 2.0, with nukes and climate change this time!
That's a misunderstanding of the causes. Now, admittedly there's a debate on this so what I will say is an opinion, but one that shows how the tariffs did cause the great depression.
The problem people have in understanding the great depression is the initial shock isn't the cause so much as the trigger to the cause which is the tariffs.
Had the tariffs not come into play, the stock sell off and subsequent deflation could have been resolved with simple monetary easing, which is what we do today. This would have simply been a recession and we would move on. However, the tariffs following the stock sell off is why it's the great depression and not just a simple recession.
In fairness, monetary easing policy didn't really come into play until after Brenton wood agreement. That said, it would have been the right solution during the onset of the great depression.
So you can't actually say that tariffs didn't cause the great depression as again had it not been for tariffs we would have pulled through.
With that in mind, would monetary easing help us this time after the shock of tarrif-ing the hell out of everything?
No, the tariffs are actively preventing monetary easing. If you were wondering what the news about bond rates and the conflict between Bessent and Powell is about, it's because they can't ease.
At a core easing relies on borrowing money to fix the downturn. Usually, when a downturn happens, interest rates go down because there's less to invest in. If you can't get a 8% return on stocks, you buy bonds until bond returns go below 4% or so. Except, thanks to crazy man tariffs, no one trusts the bonds anymore. So USA can't ease.
I also want to note, this was clearly Bessents original plan. Hurt the economy with tariffs, then do easing and pull more money back into the American Treasury. But oops, no one trusts USA anymore...
*Edit: Lol, god damn this happens fast. Powell is talking about what I'm talking about here literally just now.
https://lemmy.ml/post/29763814?scrollToComments=true
So the inflation he's talking about is why they can't ease. Normally when stocks go down, bonds go up it's caused by deflation. People stop spending money so prices go down and thus, bond rates go down. But we're not seeing deflation, we're seeing inflation, which again is causing the inability to monetarily ease. It's just funny to me we were just talking about this and bam, there's a news article.
Sweet jebus, you're not joking. That really was fast. Thanks for being ahead of the curve for us lonely souls on the Fediverse - even if it was only for a few hours or so. And thanks for answering my question.
This aligns strongly with some sentiment I've seen around here. That what we're really up against is just a cadre of goons that are laser-focused on short term greed, a very simple playbook, and little else. I say "goon" only because I'm at a loss for a word that means: "dangerous like a cornered-and-hungry predator, yet piloted by weaponized levels of stupidity."
Things can have multiple causes spread out over time. The Great Depression didn't become Great until 1932 and the first causes were a flurry of bad borrowing and over-valuing of stock that started in the early 1920s.
No, you're right. 1929 came before 1930. There's much to unpack on the subject, but Smoot-Hawley did not cause The Depression. Worsened? Maybe, probably? Sure.
See, this kind of bullshit is what actually gives some credibility to the various 'cyclical' or 'generation based' models of history.
Such models are often either unjustifiably bold/definitive/precise in their future predictions, or they are reasonably restrained, but the pop culture version of them neuters all the caveats and nuance.
... But goddamn if there isn't some real merit to the idea of humans never learning from their own history being a consistent theme of human history.
Had to read up on the 1828 tariff that was basically enacted as a giant game of chicken, nobody expected it to pass... then it did.
Similar to Trump winning? Twice?
I really hate that we can’t collectively learn from our mistakes.
Always fat, stupid fucks that resemble McNuggets.