this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
93 points (93.5% liked)

Wikipedia

2760 readers
309 users here now

A place to share interesting articles from Wikipedia.

Rules:

Recommended:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

New pope is some guy from Chicago named Bob.

Discuss.

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 20 points 16 hours ago

[Leo XIV] is the first pope named Leo since Leo XIII

Thanks

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 36 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

So, no Pope Pizzaballa then. I guess Pope Deepdish still brings a pizza angle to the table though.

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 13 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Hey, think of it this way, he might canonise the Blues Brothers.

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 15 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

They were on a mission from god, and they hate Illinois nazis.

[–] modifier@lemmy.ca 3 points 17 hours ago

If he’s a real one he will prefer to be addressed as pope Tavern Style.

[–] DropThePot@lemy.lol 26 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 4 points 18 hours ago

Well, he's elected by priests...

[–] remotedev@lemmy.ca 18 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] socsa@piefed.social 1 points 16 hours ago

Who would win in a fight, Coach Ditka? Or tha Pope?

[–] Delta_V@lemmy.world 17 points 23 hours ago (5 children)

Every article at the top of the search results, wiki included, is frustratingly short on details about his psychology and values.

Is he more like Francis or Ratzinger? Is he more like Jesus or the Pharisees?

[–] golli@lemm.ee 6 points 18 hours ago

From what little I've read more like Francis, which isn't surprising considering he appointed the majority of those who just voted.

Apparently he's a bit more moderate. Similar focus on the poor and immigrants, which apparently Leo 13 was as well (name choice is also a statement, so reading up on whoever has the name before might be worthwhile). But slightly more conservative in regard to lgbtq and women.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

He’s like a more moderated Francis. Very much a bureaucratic centrist within the Vatican, but he still supports a lot of the Francis style reforms.

So we’re not going back to papal conservatism, but it’s not like we’re going to push further than Francis.

So basically the old vatican with some vaguely liberal messages.

(In most contexts I’d hate him, but given the overton window of the catholic church well… he’s somewhat good).

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 12 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Francis, on paper. They'll come after him for being accused of ignoring child abuse allegations. His local advocates on more progressive-leaning sources here are focefully pushing that it's a plant from the conservative side to try to keep him out of the running.

I have no awareness either way, but he seems to be perceived as a Francis continuist, for what that's worth.

Which, of course, in a lifetime position with no offramp is no guarantee of what he'll do. We'll see, I suppose.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 13 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I don't think that's the perception of him. The real perception seems to be that he's okay with what Francis did but is a little more conservative. I mean here is what the BBC is saying:

There had been talk that cardinals felt the new pope would need to be someone who would take forward Pope Francis's legacy of reaching out to those on the margins, but also bring along with him a wide spectrum of those within the Church, including those Pope Francis was sometimes at loggerheads with.

Now I don't know about you, but to me that's BBC talk for he's about to walk some shit back. That's BBC talk for enough with this fucking radical Francis Pope it's time to get back to real Catholic shit. That's how I read it.

[–] Hubi@feddit.org 5 points 21 hours ago

German News called him a compromise candidate, kind of a moderate middle of the road guy.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I mean... I appreciate the British dysfunction that leads to the concept of "BBC talk", but our local commentators just... you know, say things.

The read that he's on Francis' wavelengths but perhaps less of a reformist isn't entirely out of sync with the first summaries I saw around here, but this is the Catholic Church we're talking about, that's waaaay to the left of the spectrum people were playing with.

Again, we can't know what he'll do or the effects it'll have, but at the very least this was not a win for the counter-reformist cryptofascist wing that was trying to U-turn the whole thing.

EDIT: For the record, from local headlines:

"A profile on Francis' wavelenght" "One of Francis' trusted men" "An anti-Trump missionary" "Concerned with social justice but more conservative than Francis"

I think those play without the translation layer.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

You can't make a U-turn till you start turning the wheel. This is a turn. A moderate is a turn. Well Catholic moderate. You ain't still going straight on the same road. Whether his turn is the beginning of a wider turn or just a squiggle we can't know yet, but it ain't continuation is my point. And here's the thing about the counter reformists, this is a victory for them. When it's less reform it's a victory.

[–] snek_boi@lemmy.ml 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Idk if this was recently edited but on Wikipedia it says he has used phrases like “gender ideology”, has opposed women joining some kind of religious group or activity, and has opposed teaching about gender in Peru. He’s a conservative bigot, as far as I can tell.

[–] Delta_V@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

Yeah, apparently he voted for a Republican recently, making him complicit in USA's rapid decent into fascism.

[–] radix@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

The US Christian Nationalists are big mad, so I've got hope.

[–] jewbacca117@lemmy.world 15 points 23 hours ago

Pope Bob I would have been so much better

[–] MemmingenFan923@feddit.org 12 points 22 hours ago

The Wikipedia editors are fast. Good job

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 11 points 23 hours ago

Huh, "only" 69 years old. He'll likely be around for a while.

[–] klu9@lemmy.ca 9 points 23 hours ago

Takes "Leo" as his regnal name. Does that mean none of his choir boys will be over 25 years old?

[–] Sixtyforce@sh.itjust.works 7 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

New old fuck, new chance to do something about pedophiles.

[–] Lucien@mander.xyz 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Doubtful, though, since he's ignored it for a while now

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 hours ago

as have all of them, otherwise they wouldn't even be considered for the position of pope

[–] vane@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

Their universities are 22 minutes drive or 17.5 miles apart. Trump was so on point that I still can't believe how the fuck it happened.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 1 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I'd love to see a pope in my lifetime be the first and not the Roman Numeralth.

[–] Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 22 hours ago
[–] too_high_for_this@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago

Were you born in the last two weeks?