this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
1082 points (96.9% liked)

Lemmy Be Wholesome

8672 readers
1391 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Be Wholesome. This is the polar opposite of LemmeShitpost. Here you can post wholesome memes, palate cleanser and good vibes.

The home to heal your soul. No bleak-posting!

Rules:


1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. No NSFW Content


-Content shouldn't be NSFW

-Refrain from posting triggering content, if the content might be triggering try putting it behind NSFW tags.


7. Content should be Wholesome, we accept cute cats, kittens, puppies, dogs and anything, everything that restores your faith in humanity!


Content that isn't wholesome will be removed.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Mildly Infuriating

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Jokes

7.Credible Defense

...

Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

This is my most common fantasy if I somehow came into a billion dollars.

It's a fantasy, but I would create an apartment complex with mixed 1 2 and 3 bedrooms and set the rent below market value and then find a lawyer to draw up a legal document to turn it into a co-op so that after enough people moved in I could turn control over to them.

If I were a multibillionaire I would do this again and again until non market housing was normal In my city, and anyone wanting to build housing has to compete with a bunch of non market housing.

[–] Tracaine@lemmy.world 18 points 5 hours ago

Are there better, more efficient ways to accomplish this? Yes. Am I glad they at least did something though? Also yes.

[–] poloqualle@feddit.org 17 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Americans will build literal shoeboxes instead of 1 apartment building

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 12 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

When dealing with homeless and mentally ill this setup of isolation from other units is better. Dealing with unsanitary living, smells, fires, sounds, are all are easier to mitigate in this setup. Also America is not hurting for wide open spaces to build this type of thing.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 hours ago

Nor is Canada, where this is.

[–] SpicyColdFartChamber@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I dunno, wouldn't it be cheaper to make and wouldn't be easier to look after as well? (Having all the plumbing, heating, wiring, AC in one place)

Independent homes require a lot of work and maintenance, compared to shared Apartment buildings.

Sanitary wise, I could see it being a problem in both the cases. It really depends on the people.

Besides, just because you have land doesn't mean you should use it. Trust me, living in a place where there's virtual no trees to look at, I'd prefer to just live in a shared Apartment and enjoy the view (that's going by the picture and if there's one).

Americans are too scared of apartment buildings because it reminds them of the projects, imo. That apartments are a poor person thing.

[–] Matombo@feddit.org 14 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

is it just me or anyone else thinking that row houses would have been way more efficent than these? giving everyone living there more than 1 room

[–] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Depends. Given this happened in North America there might very well be existing production lines for these tiny houses, and construction laws are also way simpler to fulfill with those basically anywhere (e.g. in Germany you'd just have had to make the whole place a camping site). They all look pretty standardized, including those solar panels.

Although I'd agree that a properly build big building would probably last longer. Not too sure about that though, I'm just happy to hear there are still people with money actually taking care of those who're at rock bottom.

[–] Soulcreator@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I think this is the correct answer, outside of large cities it is not legal to build apartments or row houses in many places in the States. It would probably be significantly easier to skirt the zoning laws to buy a plot of land and put 100 tiny houses on it, than to attempt to get some sort exception granted to the zoning in order to build an apartment or row house.

[–] SpicyColdFartChamber@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago

not legal

I don't know this, but I am willing to bet it's not legal because of the segregation era suburban dystopia laws.

[–] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 hours ago

They are also a lot more expensive. The most expensive with these houses he built is probably the ground, but he might've gotten it for free from the town.

Might be, but those look cute as well to be honest.

[–] Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee 27 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

You might be interested in the story of Tengelo Park.

Harris Rosen went from a childhood in a rough New York City neighborhood to becoming a millionaire whose company owns seven hotels in Orlando, but his self-made success is not his proudest achievement.

Twenty years ago, the Orlando, Fla. neighborhood of Tangelo Park was a crime-infested place where people were afraid to walk down the street. The graduation rate at the local high school was 25 percent. Having amassed a fortune from his success in the hotel business, Rosen decided Tangelo Park needed some hospitality of its own.

“Hospitality really is appreciating a fellow human being,” Rosen told Gabe Gutierrez in a segment that aired on TODAY Wednesday. “I came to the realization that I really had to now say, ‘Thank you.’’’

Rosen, 73, began his philanthropic efforts by paying for day care for parents in Tangelo Park, a community of about 3,000 people. When those children reached high school, he created a scholarship program in which he offered to pay free tuition to Florida state colleges for any students in the neighborhood.

In the two decades since starting the programs, Rosen has donated nearly $10 million, and the results have been remarkable. The high school graduation rate is now nearly 100 percent, and some property values have quadrupled. The crime rate has been cut in half, according to a study by the University of Central Florida.

"We've given them hope,’’ Rosen said. “We've given these kids hope, and given the families hope. And hope is an amazing thing."

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 11 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Who would have thought that the way to reduce crime was to reduce people's need to commit crimes by giving them homes and a future.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 hours ago

Bruce Wayne but sane

[–] tty5@lemmy.world 24 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

10M over 20 years to help a community of 3000 or $166 per person per year. USA is planning to increase the military budget by 150B this year or over $400 per US citIzen...

[–] Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee 5 points 4 hours ago

Yeah I was shocked by the math on that one too. It is ridiculously cheap to lower crime and poverty, while increasing graduation rates and college enrollment. It's almost like keeping people poor and stupid and criminal is intentional.

[–] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

You're saying that as if investment into military was unnecessary these days

[–] tty5@lemmy.world 1 points 5 minutes ago

Alternatively you could eliminate oil company tax breaks and direct subsidies and that alone would fund it.

[–] brrt@lemm.ee 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It is if you don't use it when you're part of a contract that got broken from another Partie of the contract.

[–] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 hours ago

So breaking contracts now justifies military intervention?

[–] Robotsandstuff@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So this guy shouldn't be news, this should be the standard, it's scary that the one good guy with enough money to do something like this is the exception and not the norm.

We all evolved to live in tribes; we have to work together as people.

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

The problem is that we allow individuals to amass so much wealth, it inevitably leads to the rest of us being at their mercy like that. If we're lucky, they'll be sorta benevolent, like this person. Would be much easier if we took out the randomness and just had the funds to do necessary stuff like this collectively.

[–] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 13 points 23 hours ago

That's why we elected people to help the community with our collected funds. To help govern the distribution of the community effort. Well, that was the idea.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 47 points 1 day ago

Yo

Idea

What if ALL the houses we build are for reducing homelessness?

At least think about it

[–] slappypantsgo@lemm.ee 44 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Just want to remind everyone that we don’t have a housing shortage, we have a cost of living crisis. Everyone deserves a place to live and we have plenty. The will is the only thing. Fight YIMBY traitors. We can do it!

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Yimby traitors?

What's wrong with yimbys?

They won't solve the underlying problem. Sure, that requires wealth redistribution, but where is the downside?

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 6 points 18 hours ago

"YIMBY traitor" -- isn't that just a NIMBY?

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago

Two things can be wrong. We can (and should) dispose of landlords and build more housing.

[–] Aux@feddit.uk 15 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Not sure what you're talking about, but here in the UK we need over 4m houses to be built to house the current population. That's quite a lot for a country of 68m.

[–] GiveOver@feddit.uk 79 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Here's a decent article

There's a lot of negativity from armchair experts in this thread but this seems like a genuine case of somebody putting a lot of thought and a lot of effort into actually helping the homeless. It's not just dropping a bunch of tiny houses and saying "job done".

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's deadass exhausting seeing people whinge whenever anything that improves the world happens. Always enough time for criticism, never enough to do something anywhere near as positive IRL.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Busyvar@jlai.lu 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fight against homelessness shall not be charity driven.

[–] Liberteez@lemm.ee 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yes but this is still a good idea in the meantime

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›