this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
502 points (98.3% liked)

memes

14864 readers
5498 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
502
Personally I prefer SI units (sub.wetshaving.social)
submitted 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) by weird@sub.wetshaving.social to c/memes@lemmy.world
 
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 12 points 2 hours ago

Nothing more European than a metrosexual

[–] halvar@lemm.ee 10 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

As someone who isn't into feet, I've always just assumed it's because uncovered feet are vaugely intimate. As in feet are mostly covered by shoes but when you get to see them uncovered it might just mean the situation has gotten intimate. I mean that's basically the idea behind any societal view which dictates that women should cover any particular part of their body, it's not that muslim people inherently find hair sexy, it's the societal norms which attached an intimate meaning to hair.

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

I have to agree with this one. I acknowledge that feet are indeed connected to genitalia via nerves, but I highly, highly doubt that's the reason that viewing a woman's bare feet makes some men horny. I don't think the foot fetish is about her and/or her nerves or pleasure at all. It's a simple matter of getting to see an often delicate looking body part that is usually concealed, and being allowed to interact with them in a sexual way. I'm more of a butt/thighs/hips guy, myself.

[–] ProfessorProteus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

I agree with you both; it's the most logical explanation. See also: cultures that don't revere womens' breasts (likely) since they're never covered.

Also

I'm more of a butt/thighs/hips guy, myself.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 16 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (3 children)

many people wonder that, why are feet so desired? sure, there are people that are into every crevice of the body, but feet seem to be winning the popularity race by a lot? hell, even otherwise vanilla people like them sometimes

the answer issss... (probably) that our spaghetti wiring of the nerves is to blame. you see the nerves responsible for feet connect to the spinal cord riiiight next to where our genitals connect as well. so sometimes the more intense signals tickle the unintended paths next to their intended one. some people when they orgasm (myself included) can feel a wave of electricity running down into their feet, even making one or multiple of their toes curl.

picture of a diagram of the spinal cord, the relevant nerves being Lumbar nerves (Lx) and Sacral nerves (Sx)

Lumbar spine L1 – the first lumbar nerve is responsible for sensations around the groin and genitals, and has a role in motor control of the hips. L2, L3, L4 convey sensation for the front and inside of the thighs, and extend to the inner aspect of the lower legs. L5 nerve region covers the outside of the thighs extending into the outer aspect of the top of the lower legs.

Sacral Spine S1, S2, S3, S4, S5 nerves provide some nerve supply to the genitals, as well as the anus, sacrum, buttocks and the backs of the thighs. The pudendal nerve is the nerve bundle comprising nerves from S2-S4 and which is the primary nerve of the perineal area.

[–] AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works 1 points 52 minutes ago (1 children)

it's also just a reaction to sexually transmitted epidemics, interestingly enough.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9819924/

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 1 points 6 minutes ago
[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 13 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

That explains it from a having your feet played with side, but not really from the finding feet hot side.

[–] vodka@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago

One causes the other

[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

I think the more important overlap is in the brain itself. We have known that regions of cortex that register genital stimulation are adjacent to/overlap with the area hat registers foot stimulation since Penfield did the first mapping of cortex in the 1930s.

In answer to "that's true for perception, but why the excitement for looking" lays in that the homuncular representation is not a simple one. We know that there are multiple homuncululi tied to different types of perception, and there is more modern work that ties the planning and goal systems to the functional centres around key points of the homonculi. The physical closeness of the two is possibly responsible for the mingling of the two representations. Back in the day there was even a mechanism for it - "ephaptic excitation" - where axons running in a bundle could activate neighbouring fibres through changing the ionic composition of the fluid around them.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

sounds like it's a double whammy then! really no wonder feet are so popular

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 25 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

I think shitting on Americans for every little thing they handle differently is moronic but I will say I won't ever order food that's advertised as "footlong". That's just needlessly gross. I don't like to imagine the cashier lining up a sandwich with their bare sole for quality control but that's the kinda mental image the term conjures up.

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 5 points 1 hour ago

It's Footlong® not foot-long. Not to be confused with an actual measurement or size guarantee.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Footlong sandwiches have nothing to do with the body part "foot".

They hardly have anything to do with the measurement "foot" since they are like 10.5 inches (~26cm) now or something (as opposed to the 30ish centimeters that make a foot).

This is part of the enshittificaton of Subway.

Their cookies are still dope tho.

[–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I'm like 60% sure during the height of subway in mid-2000s-early 2010s the subway commercials actually did advertise the foot long as being 12 inch sub's for 5$ (goddamn the 5$ foot long ads were catchy). However unlike real measurements that have defined standards, as subway enshitified they weren't forced to change naming as they slowly shrank the sandwiches. Of course this is long enough ago that an entire generation doesnt know who Jared was so its okay to assume it was never a real foot long.

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 27 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Wait to you find out how they measure the 6 inch ones.

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Well that explains the shrinkflation

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] Colloidal@programming.dev 2 points 52 minutes ago

When you're in the pool, there's shrinkage!

[–] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

How about a sandwich shop where you can order a Big Italian?

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 2 points 3 hours ago

Well if it's a sandwich shop you'd really need two Italians, even big ones.