this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
232 points (100.0% liked)

News

29494 readers
3217 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On Thursday, a federal judge in Massachusetts issued a preliminary injunction blocking President Trump and U.S. Education Secretary Linda McMahon from carrying out Trump's executive order calling for the secretary to close the Education Department.

The judge also told the administration to reinstate the roughly 1,300 Education Department employees who were told in March that they would lose their jobs as part of a sweeping reduction-in-force and "to restore the Department to the status quo."

In his ruling, District Court Judge Myong J. Joun wrote, "A department without enough employees to perform statutorily mandated functions is not a department at all. This court cannot be asked to cover its eyes while the Department's employees are continuously fired and units are transferred out until the Department becomes a shell of itself."

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 70 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

these poor fucking kids, y'all.

covid in 2020, trump again in 2025, decades of anti-education bullshit..

real victims of the information war

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 12 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

No Child Left Behind was the first shot against education

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 hour ago

Yeah, that, and the damn voucher scam they used to begin siphoning funding from public schools into private ones. Now they’re just straight up trying to fund private religious schools with taxpayer dollars. Blatantly unconstitutional, just like the rest of this admin.

[–] Retreaux@lemmy.world 12 points 4 hours ago

Not quite the information age I was promised in the 90s.... Womp womp

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 87 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

For fuck's sake, it was created by an act of Congress. This should be a no-brainer. Either the president's job is to execute on the law as determined by Congress, not to just overrule it by fiat, or we have a king.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 27 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 19 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] sfxrlz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 44 minutes ago

It’s nudity. The king is naked

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 13 points 5 hours ago

The word you are looking for is more like dictator.
It's not that it is wrong, but it is a bit fuzzy. Because Kings haven't had dictatorial powers in western countries for centuries, and modern Kings are generally NOT above the law, and are often an integral part of well functioning democracies in modern societies.
Denmark Norway and Sweden are all kingdoms, and are among the highest functioning democracies in the world.

[–] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 29 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The judge also told the administration to reinstate Education Department employees who lost their jobs during the reduction-in-force announced on March 11 and “to restore the Department to the status quo.”

Or what? Seriously. He's not going to do it, nothing will change, he won't have any consequences, and he will continue penetrating America's proverbial asshole with a hot curling iron.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 25 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Ideally, start arresting every person who enacts the president's illegal actions. They should have arrested every person in DOGE that illegally occupied any of the government buildings or seized government information.

Its not going to happen.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Well interestingly enough that big beautiful bill removes the courts ability to do it...

No court of the United States may use appropriated funds to enforce a contempt citation for failure to comply with an injunction or temporary restraining order if no security was given when the injunction or order was issued….

https://robertreich.substack.com/p/the-hidden-provision-in-the-big-ugly

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 5 points 5 hours ago

If the president can ignore the court, the court can ignore the laws.

Of course, down that road lies. . . well, we passed Madness a while back. Not sure where this road leads, anymore.

[–] NJSpradlin@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Did the big beautiful bill make it through?

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, the House passed it this morning.

[–] DragonSidedD@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Still has to pass the Senate

Angry fiscal conservatives might still kill it if their constituents are up in arms about spending

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago

Oh for sure. Senate Republicans have stated that they were annoyed the house was wasting their time with the bill in its current form.

It will probably end up changing significantly. Most of the Senate is more moderate than House members.

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 14 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

U.S. Education Secretary Linda McMahon

I don't think I'll ever get used to this best value Idiocracy

[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Best value? I'd say it's A1!