this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
147 points (99.3% liked)

Firefox

19693 readers
3 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 74 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

God damnit so they bought Fakespot, an extension that actually did good, hiding fake botted reviews and reanalyzing them - and now they're killing it. It was literally an extension to help prevent unnecessary buying. Why the hell did they even buy it?

We acquired Fakespot in 2023 to help people navigate unreliable product reviews using AI and privacy-first tech. While the idea resonated, it didn’t fit a model we could sustain.

Then why did you buy it you idiots?!

[–] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'm also exactly on the same boat as you; I use Fakepost frequently and now it will be canned by Mozilla. The alternative I found is https://reviewmeta.com/, but it's quite slow and can't cover all domains of Amazon.

I'll give it a try, but yeah very disappointed

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 43 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I understand retiring Pocket after a long, long run.

But what's up with ending FakeSpot? They just bought that. They spent an undisclosed amount of money and are now abandoning it.

Is the FakeSpot shuttering a sign of money totally wasted, or should I be concerned that the FakeSpot TOS allowed them to sell user data (specifically in the event of an acquisition) right before the Mozilla acquisition?

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's astounding how stupid that decision was. Fakespot, quite literally a device to help deter people from buying products, was gobbled up by way too much money by Mozilla - who - apparently wanted it to make profit? How?! Why?! Why did they even buy it?

I think it was just executive idiocy. They searched for extensions with the term privacy in them, bought it, and thought it would make their product worth more. I'm getting really tired of companies just sunsetting products the instant they don't make money.

We really need an open version of fakespot.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Teixeira v Mozilla (2024):

Apart from Firefox, none of Mozilla’s other product offerings were profitable, with the Pocket product notably being allowed to operate in a state of negative profitability for over 5 years before Mr. Teixeira joined Mozilla.

[–] bunitor@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

do we have any idea about how this lawsuit is going?

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago
[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I think it can be VERY valuable especially today with all the ai spam.

It's not about buying less, it's about people making you a trusted source when they look to buy.

I cannot believe they are stupidly abandoning this, it could be a gold mine

[–] Vincent@feddit.nl 11 points 1 week ago

I expect that Fakespot already had problems funding themselves, and thus they were a relatively cheap acquisition, and now it turned out they couldn't cover their own costs as part of Mozilla either. But I've never used it so I have no idea.

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

what’s up with ending FakeSpot? They just bought that.

Assuming the tool was not accepted and used well enough by the user base. Also Mozilla got all user data and the technology. Maybe they plan on a new project that implements part of it in the future? Mozilla is currently experimenting a lot. Shutting down lot of services should be expected.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 5 points 1 week ago

it was never available outside the usa i think. hard to get useful market penetration then

killedbymozilla.com

Sucks, these were both somewhat useful services (pocket particularly)

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

What a terrible day to hear about Fakespot for the first time :(

[–] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Mozilla should make Fakepost source code open-source so that people (with right hardware) can self-host it.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Seriously. If they're not even interested in making money off it anymore then why not?

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If it's open source how easy will it be for others then to game the system?

There are open source tools for analyzing if github stars are fake, and they work reliably.

The kind of people that fake reviews/stars target are not the kind of people that are going to be verifying things.

As long as Amazon doesn't crack down, there isn't really a need to game the system.

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Owho! This was one of the only useful services provided by Mozilla. Well fk it.

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I use pocket to easily sent sites to my e reader.

[–] TheAgeOfSuperboredom@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago

Same! This is really unfortunate.

[–] fireshell@kbin.earth 1 points 1 week ago

Normally postpone to read in the e-book this is Readeck, Wallabag and LinkWarden (taste and color), I have Self-Hosted Wallabag through KOReader.

[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Owho indeed

[–] fireshell@kbin.earth 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Imagine that someone collected and kept the bookmarks there, and now they will disappear. Another reason to remember that you do not need to store anything important remotely.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago

This is why whenever I want to save a news article, I actually save it to my computer as a PDF. Not only can your online bookmark store be shut down, the article itself can be deleted or edited especially if it's a hot button issue.

[–] SilliusMaximus@mander.xyz 6 points 1 week ago

Oh nooo.. less bloat? anyway

[–] zdhzm2pgp@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I kind of liked visiting https://getpocket.com/explore just to read some of the stories they had posted there, but oh well.

Is Mozilla on its last legs?

EDIT: a more highbrow alternative to the pocket explore articles is Arts & Letters Daily.

[–] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 week ago

Cool now kill everything else and go back to just being a fucking browser

[–] Lemmchen@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago

Thank you, I've hated pocked ever since the forced integration.

[–] fireshell@kbin.earth 2 points 1 week ago

Setup Miniflux to fetch all my feeds, which I can parse through manually during the day and send over the choice pieces to Wallabag for later reading, either at lunch or at nighttime using my phone or KOReader.