this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
606 points (96.9% liked)

Facepalm

3202 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 30 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

To me it seriously looks absolutely like fruit juice that has baking soda in it for some reason I'm not aware of - maybe health benefits? And if it didn't mention baking soda I would totally expect it to be fruit juice. But apparently it's a household cleaner, and there's also a watermelon version. WTF is wrong with the people who make this shit?

I fully understand the exchange students' confusion. There's nothing on the label that says or indicates it's a cleaner, and that's a plausible beverage container design.

[–] Talonflame@lemmy.cafe 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Not gonna lie, from the thumbnail I thought it was a fruity drink too....

[–] NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago

Even when looking at the picture, I still don't know what it is. I'm assuming soap based on the comments, but it's not obvious at all.

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago

This is why people need consumer regulation. Bottles have one shape and soaps another

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 10 points 6 days ago

Oh that is, I also thought that was a drink, what the fuck?

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

is this the soda you drink while baking food?

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 days ago

Time to pick up some Mr. Yuck stickers.

[–] JulieLemming@lemm.ee -3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

I have drank such an appetizer and I must say I do not understand what the fuss is all about. It is literally the thing you add to cake - "BAKING soda". You eat the cake and so you eat the baking soda that was added to it to make it BAKE. There is nothing remotely unhealthy about eating things meant for consumption.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There is nothing remotely unhealthy about eating things meant for consumption.

Alright. A as table salt is very much meant for consumption and present in pretty much every food there is, you wouldn't mind backing up your statement by showing me how you eat a few large spoonfuls, since there's "nothing remotely unhealthy" about it, right?

I don't believe anyone that stupid could even find themselves to Lemmy so obvious ragebait is obvious ragebait, I just wish they'd be even a little better

[–] JulieLemming@lemm.ee -1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I not only eat salt but I even bathe in it. I have recently bought "bathing salts". It is a special salt that not only can be added to meals but also it has second purpose as a relaxing bath additive.

Haters are going to hate me about the baking soda but I am fine and I felt zero negative effects. I don't know what's the fuss about eating a little extra of something that was already in your dessert anyway.

My brother says it is actually good for you and replenishes soda in your blood.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Are you twelve or schizphrenic? Because whatever you has which makes you think you're being funny is lying to you.

You can't eat a tablespoon of salt. You're not capable of doing that. End of story.

[–] JulieLemming@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago

I don't know why you think I am joking, I have just said you everything I know about salts and their uses. Tablespoon for me is usually not enough to get through the working day anyway. I find that some bathing salt acts like coffee for me except a bit longer effect and I quite enjoy it.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Fabulous isn't a drink. It's a multi-purpose cleaner that you absolutely should not drink.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 9 points 6 days ago

Nothing Ever Happens.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 174 points 1 week ago (5 children)

If not drink, why drink shaped?

(seriously, what even is it?)

[–] Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 87 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] troed@fedia.io 89 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"baking soda"

I'm even more confused now

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 54 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It said with baking soda. Baking soda can do a lot for cleaning.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 141 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I don't know this brand and ngl if I saw that on a kitchen table there is a pretty good chance I'd drink it too. That is downright irresponsible label design.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] dumbass@leminal.space 80 points 1 week ago

To be fair, it does look tasty as fuck.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 54 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Packaging is definitely cultural as anyone who’s spent any significant time in a different culture knows.

It even misleads within your own culture, like how 80% of the “Ice Cream” packaged in ice cream cartons is actually “Frozen Dairy Dessert”.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 51 points 1 week ago (11 children)

never mind that, why would you have baking soda in bottles????

It's a tiny package of white powder. What is this insanity?

[–] EvelynGrace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 6 days ago

It's a cleaning product with baking soda in it, not actual baking soda for cooking

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I'm Canadian and English is my first language. If I didn't see that product in a cleaning products isle at the store, I would be very confused because it looks like a drink and while baking soda is something to clean with, it is also something to bake with. It should at very least have the words cleaner or detergent in equally large lettering on the front label.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago (11 children)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] codexarcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Even down here where Fabulosa is common, I occasionally mistake it for juice. I guess people are mortally terrified of "communist conformity" and need the soothing market comforts of 80 flavors of everything all from the same one company, but I would truly love if most products were regulated to come in standardized containers.

Imagine the benefits. You can still have whatever insane labels you want. But now all bottles are instantly identifiable by shape or silhouette. Tall, squarish, and easily pourable, must be juice. Short, round, with embedded poison symbols? Not juice!

All bottles of a type could be easily sorted, cleaned, and reused. No worries about plastic cross contamination.

Each kind of bottle is engineered by a materials science task force to be the right kind and amount of plastic to make this work long term for each purpose.

Because gov. subsidies will help manufacture the standardized bottle and everyone can use them, costs actually go down across industries. The recycling sector could also stand to grow by increased need for logistics and management of standardized waste, which becomes another cheap stream of materials for packagers.

Kids, foreign visitors, the aged or infirm, the inebriated, and others all benefit from faster, easier identification of the kind of material they are dealing with. Again, "Is this food?" is one of life's fundamental questions and what is "society" doing for anyone if it's not at least making that question easier and more reliable to answer?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›