this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
134 points (100.0% liked)

World News

47530 readers
3996 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tehran “is the principal source of regional instability and terror,” declare G7 leaders in a joint statement.

The leaders of the G7 countries on Monday issued a joint statement saying Iran should not have nuclear weapons and affirming Israel's right to defend itself.

"Iran is the principal source of regional instability and terror. We have been consistently clear that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon," declared the statement, issued by the leaders of the U.S., U.K., France, Germany, Italy, Canada and Japan, along with the EU.

They pledged to "remain vigilant to the implications for international energy markets and stand ready to coordinate, including with like-minded partners, to safeguard market stability."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 10 points 1 hour ago

China, India, and Pakistan once again proving that having nukes does actually matter because you can't be arbitrarily shoved around around by the only other nuclear powers.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 20 points 4 hours ago

Jesus fucking Christ. Fuck all of these assholes.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 30 points 4 hours ago (13 children)

nobody should have nuclear weapons.

Sometimes I wonder what the world would be like if the scientists working on the Manhattan project had all agreed it's too much and intentionally sabotage every test.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 52 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (5 children)

I believe ALL of the following;

  • Iran should not have nuclear weapons
  • Israel should not have nuclear weapons
  • Iran should not weaponize Palestinian suffering or coax them into attacking Israel while Iran itself sees little repercussions
  • Israel should not genocide
  • Israel has committed genocide and should pay a hefty price
  • Neither Iran nor Israel will really answer for their fuckery
  • Palestinians will remain fucked...if they survive.

My heart breaks for the Palestinian people who suffer and die for others' greed, ambition, and political squabbles.

[–] ztwhixsemhwldvka@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Iran is answering for their fuckery

[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

My exact thoughts

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

This is the nature of modern day proxy conflicts. Both actors can continue easily but the "battlefield" like Gaza and South Lebanon are the ones that lose.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Exactly. This is not a competition, we don’t have to cheer for either side. Horrible things are happening

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 hours ago

Damn, that's the most reasonable take I've heard all year. Kudos

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 101 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (3 children)

Israel is the principal source of regional instability and terror and everyone and his dog knows this.

The kowtowing to Trump and his Zionist sponsors by the client states of the US Empire is an insult to objective reality.

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 19 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Please don't make Iran out to be some sort of victim in all this. What Israel is doing is wrong, but Iran has funded a lot of terrorists throughout the years, and execute people in medival ways for holding hands with the "wrong" person.

The iranian government is pure fucking evil and deserves to die horrible deaths for what they instigate and fund around the world and in their local area.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

It's a deep sarcasm that Western oil companies destabilized the Iranian monarchy, that * shockingly* wanted a piece of the pie in such a way it paved the way for islamist extremists to gain power.

Ian used to be pretty liberal and western minded, however westen meddling caused this extreme government.

But God forbid they get the means to (to use the Israeli turn off phrase) 'defend' itself, that would be horrendous.

[–] Velypso@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Yes, yes, we all know Iran used to be liberal a very long time ago.

That ship has sailed, and the current regime isn't great, to say the very least.

Nuclear bombs would not be used to defend Iran. They would be used to defend Khamenei. In the same way that nukes are for defending that shit stain in Israel and not Israel.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Ik no fan of the current regime, I think both Israel and Iran would benefit from a regime change. There's nothing more moral on the Israeli side to explain them deserving nukes over anyone in that region.

But the hypocrisy is that the Western world directly caused this shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Two things (countries) can be bad at the same time

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

And not only that, Israel has nuclear weapons.

[–] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 1 points 45 minutes ago

...and it's supposed to be a secret because God forbid having to comply with international treaties on nukes. Well it's not like they respect international law anyway right? But the ones on nukes they just bypass and no one bats an eye

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 hours ago

“We will vaporize every living thing on the face of the earth in order to ensure that the threat of Iran possibly maybe but probably not having a nuclear weapon will be neutralized!”

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 24 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (7 children)

Why? If the West will allow Israel to live stream a genocide and both political parties in the US stick their fingers in their ears and make sounds like children, Iran has no choice but to pursue a nuke to defend itself.

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 12 points 6 hours ago

I would have worded this differently, but you're right in that it's probably a good idea not to give anyone an extra excuse.

"Oh but we had to" isn't a great excuse, but it is one, and if you take away the threat, it takes it away that argument.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Iran will have nukes. They don't have a choice. Not anymore. It's existentialism at this point. Israel has been trying to engineer a war against Iran for more than 30 years. All the while Iran has played along. IAEA inspectors and all that good shit. And it was all for nothing. Iran knows that now. So does everyone else.

If you're an adversary to the US and its Imperial interests then its a matter of when, not if. Doesn't matter if or how closely you follow their rules. They will come for you in time.

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

They're out of time. US B52s and B2s will obliterate what's left of their nuclear facilities. F35s and drones will do the rest. For all the Zionist propaganda, there's absolutely no evidence Iran wanted to weaponise Uranium and every evidence that they wanted to cooperate with the West in return for sanctions relief, as they did in 2015 with the JCPOA.

The question is can Iran make it painful enough for the US by causing chaos in the straits of Hormuz and damaging oil and gas infrastructure that Trump loses interest and declares victory before he imposes regime change, which is what Netanyahu really wants.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 3 points 4 hours ago (10 children)

Iran is the principal source of regional instability and terror.

Ok does someone want to catch me up on this opinion shared by world leaders but quite literally no one else?

Like yes, Iran is a terrible authoritarian state that is very dangerous. But so is Saudi Arabia?!

[–] Iceblade02@lemmy.world 1 points 57 minutes ago* (last edited 56 minutes ago)

Here's the short version (yes, this is incomplete because even writing this is a small essay. If somebody feels like adding context please do so), to answer your question on the background to their statement & position. The position is fairly common outside Lemmy at least.

History, history, history... (very long story)

2022: Israel was working on normalizing relations with the Arab countries. Things are relatively peaceful in the ME, albeit pretty shit for Arabs in Gaza & WB, not a warzone though. This succeeding would have been a threat to the Iranian network of terrorist organizations (Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthis, groups in Syria such as the IRGC).

Iran pushes forth October 7 to reignite tensions, training Hamas operatives & such.

Hamas attacks Israel on Oct. 7 kicking off the war - other Iranian proxy groups soon join in. Initially there is no direct conflict between Israel & Iran.

2024 april - IDF strikes the Iranian consulate in Syria to take senior officers in the Hezbollah chain of command and assassinates several others. Iran retaliates with missiles against with strikes against Israel proper.

After that, tit for tat strikes in increasing magnitude and escalations which have culminated in the current situation. No, it was not surprising, this conflict was always fundamentally between Israel & Iran and has been slowly escalating for a long time.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›