this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2025
298 points (89.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

12321 readers
2204 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
toaster@slrpnk.net
grue@lemmy.world
Toaster1@lemmy.world
298
Man complains about the government forcing him to buy a new car so he and his wife can continue to do their 1km school run. (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by destructdisc@lemmy.world to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
75 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

And I thought Americans were carbrained, holy shit.

(To be fair, he's not wrong in that this is intended to keep the auto companies and the government nice and fat -- but the obvious response to this is to agitate for better public transit, not railing against an environmentally sound policy.)

The article in question.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Don’t forget to buy F1 tickets.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 34 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

ITT: Some people want OOP's wife and kid to walk to school on what's essentially a highway. Others seem to realize that there might be a reason why OOP's wife needs the car, and given that OOP's done 65000 km in 15 years, he's not exactly doing a whole lot of driving with it.

There's also suggestions of using public transport, but if that even exists for their route, OOP's wife can't exactly just go walk on a bus, she could get gang raped, because this is Delhi.

We're not talking about a big SUV either. It's a tiny little hatchback, the most city-friendly car possible:

The situation sucks for everyone involved. Whereas in the west we're used to it being just a transit availability issue, in parts of the world there's also the safety issue. Yes, the famous gang-rape-set-on-fire-murder case was 13 years ago, but that doesn't mean Delhi is magically safe now. It's still a huge issue.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 6 points 7 hours ago

The has got to be an alternate route that is nicer than that, that's wild.

But I get that sone areas are incredibly car centric and leave you little choice.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 19 points 11 hours ago

Don't complain about 1km school runs until you have tried to do it on foot - in Delhi. Using a car might be the only halfway safe method in that area.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 50 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'd be mad if the government forced me to get rid of my working car too. I think a better option would be to do something like not allow new gas cars to be manufactured or registered to people. Like stop issuing license plates for gas cars rather than forcing everyone to get rid of them.

[–] dejpivo 2 points 4 hours ago

Sounds like how the EU is usually doing this. Limit the companies, not the people directly.

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 89 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Isn't it true that once a car is built, it's basically better for the environment to drive it until its wheels fall off instead of scrapping it to buy any new one (even electric) though ? He's right that a lot of the time these schemes are thinly veiled auto industry handouts to stimulate the economy, instead of actual environmental regulations.

[–] Tabula_stercore@lemmy.world 17 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Isn't it true that once a car is built, it's basically better for the environment to drive it until its wheels fall off instead of scrapping it

In terms of global warming; maybe. It depends on many factors when looking at a specific case. Another commenter already put some numbers together.

The environment, however, in this case is Dehli, a city with terrible air quality. Removing an active source of CO2, NOx, heavy metals, etc is good for that environment. Especially human lungs.

[–] Benaaasaaas@group.lt 1 points 4 hours ago

Except that i10, even an old one, is not a big source of CO2 or NOx

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago

If the government provides safe and comfortable public transit instead.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

The environmental break even period for EVs is getting shorter and shorter as the power grids get cleaner and cleaner.

It was a somewhat solid argument against buying new EVs to replace working ICE cars over 10 years ago, but now it's really not.

[–] thedbp@feddit.dk 27 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Every 35000 km or 21000 miles a gasoline car going on average 20km/l or 47mpg why H have produced the same amount of CO2 that it takes to make an electric car.

So if over the lifetime of the car you go less than 35000km you shouldn't be changing it with an electric. Otherwise please do 😁

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago

The break even on carbon emissions from manufacture vs. daily use is somewhere between around 3 and 10 years. Big trucks on the low end.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] november@lemmy.vg 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It may not be carbrain so much as shitty car-centric infrastructure.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Certainly seems so. From the picture the OOP posted, it doesn't look like there's paved walkways

[–] TassieTosser@aussie.zone 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

A 5-8kg school bag is insane. What the hell is going on there? Where I live, it's only 2kg.

[–] paranoia@feddit.dk 4 points 11 hours ago

Lucky you. I think school bags in many countries, even developed ones are at an abuse level. When I was 12 my bag often weighed 10kg+, no lockers. I had hoped the situation had improved until I spoke to my 20 years younger cousin, it's still the same shit. I believe it is probably a major contributing factor to scoliosis and kyphosis for children and teenagers, but still it persists

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 13 hours ago

Honestly if he's done 65000 km in 15 years it may well be that he only uses it to drive routes where you literally can't walk, like this one.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

This dude is the one living in a fool's paradise with infrastructure like that, and I say that as someone living in a fool's paradise with infrastructure only a little better than that.

[–] Z3k3@lemmy.world 98 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Sadly 1km is not the dumbest distant i have seen

Back when I walked my kids to school a parent who shared a fence with the school would drive them around a piece of grass the the front of the school and drop them of. The path through the grass was along side their side garden wall and shorter than the road they drove.

Of course it was a huge 4x4 to boot

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 62 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I used to live next to some folk who would drive 300 metres to the gym

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, that one always gets me: and then they run 5 miles on a treadmill.

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I always thought the equipment should all be hooked up to some sort of generator somehow so that the place could turn all that energy being spent exercising into electricity for the lights etc. There could also be pancakes 🥞

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Human exercise produces so little electricity that it would probably be a net negative to produce everything required for this gimmick.

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 3 points 13 hours ago

You need an exercise bike to produce something like a few hundred watts at most, if you can keep up an intense session. Continous stable power generation will be lower.

And everything which isn't a bike will have much lower peak power generation capacity, and will be less efficient too

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 day ago

I used to walk 500m round trip to nearby restaurant for lunch, everyone i met will comment on how far that is. Of course, i take it to heart and now drive my 4x4 there.

Nah just kidding, i now ride a bike, often 3.5km round trip for lunch.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 59 points 1 day ago (1 children)

1km 🤡

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 38 points 1 day ago (3 children)

On the streets of New Delhi this will probably take just as long as walking. Need the AC though.

[–] lost@lemmy.wtf 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've been to Mumbai, and 1km is fine for us Europeans, but depending on their location, it can be a life-threatening experience due to the intense traffic, pollution and heat.

[–] MummysLittleBloodSlut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That sounds really dangerous. Someone should ban fuel there to make it safer.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 12 hours ago

Unfortunately fuel being burned in other countries is still heating up their environment.

Also idk if you've heard, but India isn't exactly a rich place. A lot of people can't afford EVs. Despite the fact that yes, the Indian market has cheap options available. But my man in the tweet has been nursing a Hyundai i10 for 15 years. He ain't exactly trying to spend money on cars.

The entire policy is designed to hurt poor people that are car dependent (if you look at the photo of the street in his other tweet, you'll see why he isn't walking the 1 kilometer. There's no sidewalk).

If the government also gave him a good public transit option with AC, the fuel ban could easily be justified. As it is now, rich people will buy newer cars and poor people will be criminals, or take on debt they can't afford to get buy newer cars.

[–] destructdisc@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Longer. It takes about 12 minutes to walk 1km. A car in Delhi traffic will take about 20 minutes to cover that during the morning rush hour

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (9 children)

What's this about? Government-mandated to reduce emissions? Switching to electric, or just "better" ICE cars?

AFAIK pollution is a serious problem in India's cities - but people like this guy are going to defend their "personal freedoms" (cleverly masked as economical concern) tooth and nail.

edit: I stand corrected. This is someone being upset about bad policy. Still, the "wife" and "1km", both suggesting this is a secondary vehicle, triggers me. Standard upper middleclass griping.

[–] destructdisc@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Government-mandated to reduce emissions?

On the surface, yes. In reality they're just offloading environmental responsibility on to citizens (and making them buy "better" ICE cars so the auto industry gets the profits) instead of improving and expanding public transit to make it easier to get around without a car.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Oka@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Bro your title is misleading.

Indian man upset that the government is forcing him to buy a new car

Your title makes the man sound like he's complaining about his wife

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›