this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
742 points (99.5% liked)

politics

24790 readers
2335 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani holds a 10 point lead over Andrew Cuomo in New York City’s general election for mayor, while incumbent Mayor Eric Adams trails in fourth place behind Republican nominee Curtis Sliwa, according to a new poll.

Mamdani gets support from 35 percent of registered voters, followed by Cuomo with 25, Sliwa with 14, Adams at 11 and attorney Jim Walden at 1 percent. Thirteen percent of respondents said they weren’t sure, while 1 percent picked another candidate.

(page 2) 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 148 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Lol. New Yorkers be like: this guy scares rich people. ✅

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 56 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I’m low key pretty concerned about Mamdani’s safety - between (essentially official, government-supported) expressions of stochastic terrorism, to weaponization of immigration law and enforcement, to straight up assassination attempts by far right wing-nuts, I will honestly be very pleasantly surprised if he makes it to the election without someone trying something pretty serious.

And to be clear, I do hope he makes it to the election, and wins, and that his term as mayor makes it blindingly obvious to the vast majority of people that Mamdani’s tactics are the clear way forward. I’m also just fully aware that we’re in the “kicking and screaming” phase with reactionaries, and that those same people are running shit now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

By this point, the world is like that, eagerly watching if the guy can upset such a corrupt, biased system.

So he will definitely be the democratic nominee, right? And now he's going against a republican in the general election? When is it?

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 week ago (2 children)

He is the Democratic nominee. As the post says, he's mostly going against the former Democratic, current independent, mayor Andrew Cuomo more than the republican candidate.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Now it's time for the "vote blue no matter who" crowd to put up or shut up. So far, party loyalty doesn't seem very important to a lot of the establishment.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

That's because they only support "democracy" when it is ruled by a corporate oligarchy. Neolibs will not abandon neoliberalism when it becomes unpopular, they will abandon the illusion of democracy; just like conservatives did.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

35 percent do. I am mildly worried what happens with ranked choice voting and all the idiots that are voting for the rest of the losers. It's not like the Democratic primary where basically all the "no chance" rank 1 people were gonna put Mamdani as their second or third choice.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I would guess, with nothing but feelings, that a lot of the Cuomo voters would choose him before a Republican, but who knows really?

Edit: I believe this will be FPtP though.

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 98 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Remember, polls aren't votes. Go vote (when it's time).

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 59 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is HORRIBLE News!

-The Democrats!

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Yes. But unironically. We finally found out what it would have been like if Bernie has won the primary. The Dems would have thrown everything at him losing the general. Probably calling him antisemitic along the way.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 42 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I hate that I'm already depressed about what they're going to do to him or NYC in general...

I know nothing has happened yet and the election isn't until November, but there isn't a single goddamn thing about this country, especially with the so called leader we have now, that makes me think they will simply allow him to become Mayor. Socialists, Democratic socialists, whatever, simply aren't allowed to hold real positions of power. The entire system is freaking out over the prospect... A single seat in Congress isn't worth causing a mess over, but running "the financial center of the world" and a city that contains the richest people on earth definitely is to them...

Ether Trump takes over NYC like he's already threatened, they deport him, or the Democrats commit political suicide and get caught sabotaging his election. I have 0 faith that he simply wins and gets to be Mayor.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

It looks bleak. I try to remember that general despair and lack of faith in elections is exactly the aim of many propagandists, and that apathy only serves the aims of those who would destroy us.

It's hard sometimes because of the difficult past the US has had. Anyone trying to undermine America often need not even lie, but they do need to convince you that it's hopeless, and that change is impossible. I see no reason to oblige them.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trump can't take NYC. Even a military/ICE takeover is off the table. Even with a 20x increase in the ICE budget. There are just too many people and not enough random masked ICE "agents".

Just like with tariff negotiations, Trump thinks he has all the cards when he doesn't. He wants you to think he does, though. Fascism is always weaker than it looks.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As long as he can claim some "legal" justification for it like claiming Mamdani is a communist and therefore this is an insurrection/takeover of a city that needs to be defended or declare some kind of emergency (that the courts never seem to argue. Energy emergency as we cut methods of gaining energy for example) then I think people will mostly roll over and accept it, since it's "legal."

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago

It has nothing to do with legal issues. There is no practical way to impose martial law on NYC. The US military and ICE together are not big enough.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They'll let him be Mayor. They won't let him do anything, though.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

All of a sudden the city council decides they need curb the power of the mayoral office.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

I think the issue is a single congressperson can't show people that it works. A mayor can, and that's their biggest fear. If people learn how good it is for them they may actually start supporting it, instead of being scared like they've been told to believe by the wealthy who control the media.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (10 children)

There is going to be a LOT of Republican fuckery. I hope he's up for a fight.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] ramenbelly@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Adams losing to a guy who spent half his life wearing a starter jacket and a beret . Lmfao what a joke. He’s gonna go to jail when he’s of no use to trump .

[–] Roopappy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

They all do

[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Is this race a majority or plurality wins?

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

FPtP, so highest vote getter.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm expecting the dumbass voters to sit it out again in view of the expected landslide (or maybe another outrage happening across the world) and let the candidate with the convicted past into office. Again.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This time the Democrats have an actual flesh and blood candidate who actually stands for something. If he wins, will that alter your perspective at all?

American voters suck, just like they have always sucked, just like voters suck everyplace else. That's the field in which the game is played.

Being the lesser of two evils is not a good strategy. The greater evil gets all the attention and therefore enthusiasm. Good vs evil is a whole different dynamic.

load more comments (1 replies)

I didn't realize Curtis Sliwa was still alive.

[–] rhvg@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Adams will quit and endorse Cuomo last min 99.9% sure, Silwa> 50% IMO.

So I think it’s a toss up at best.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›