this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2025
555 points (99.5% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8261 readers
834 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A.I. aside, we should get 4 day work weeks regardless.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] susurrus0@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 hours ago

Something you should understand about the 4-day workweek.

From the studies conducted so far we know it seems to increase overall productivity. Which means companies, or at least some, would make more money if they implemented a 4-day workweek. So then you may ask yourself: why haven't they? Don't they want to make more money?

Not necessarily. It all comes down to relative wealth. A 4-day workweek would benefit them, but it would benefit regular people more. And so the divide in wealth/power/quality of life would shrink. So technically they'd be richer, but they'd feel poorer, because we'd get closer to their level, even if by just a bit.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

that’s nice marketing for bernie but we all know that won’t happen. not without the kind of revolutionary action that inspired our 8 hour working day, and the original “labor day.”

[–] vfreire85@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

employees in some sectors could easily make do with a 3 day work week, 4 hours per day, no payment reduction. all the rest is just surplus value being generated. however we know that the capitalists will never allow that, and that's the reason we need to, while pushing for work week reductions, agitate the working class today in order to build the revolution of tomorrow.

[–] unphazed@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Meanwhile my job as a phone jockey went from 500 employees to no hiring for 4 years to now 212 employees and calls are back to back with no hope of new job openings... also makes seniority rough as everyone is a veteran at this point.

[–] zonklezoop@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 hours ago

Shit drives me nuts. I work for a service delivery organization and the last few years have seen us adopting a new platform that likes to talk up automation and efficiencies. Making things work is my job, but I don't hesitate to tell folks that while we can help improve and change the jobs they do, they still have to have call center and field resources.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Yea more like if CEOs want their company to be more successful pay people overtime to work five days a week.

and if extruded proof of work was meaningful work, something interesting would have happened by now

if their little genies were real there'd be a good novel by now

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

they’ll all just convince us we need to purchase more, thereby lowering “productivity”

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But who's going to make my fart and Trump dancing with Musk videos!??

[–] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

You think people are making them during their work time? More free time means more people can make those.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 0 points 22 hours ago

You mean Head Fart Tuner at Turbodong2000 is not a real job?

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

All the productivity gains in the past have helped us reduced the work load so much, there's no reason AI shouldn't...
Wait, that never happened, only people forcefully getting reductions in work time have ever gotten results.

Also it's still not clear whether AI makes any sense or not. Yes, I know it is useful to some, but once you consider all the externalities (which nobody ever does, because "not my problem"), it might not be such a great deal.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

*20 hour work week.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bernie the sheepdog says a lot. Ask him to say GENOCIDE

[–] crankyrebel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

True, and he refuses to call it genocide, even when pressured.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Flagg76@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Been having a 4 day workweek for a decade now, can heavily recommend it. (Work 4x9 hours, every Wednesday of)

[–] Yeller_king@reddthat.com 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think the plan is to lay us off altogether.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tronn4@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thw American workers productivity has gone astronomically high without AI. We should have 4 day week yes but we need the money from all this productivity first.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

We as a species could have arranged any kind of leisure society when we started using fossil fuels. The energy bonanza that allowed us to reach 8 billion people with chemically-boosted and machine-harvested food allows it.

Of course, this means a flattening of the lifestyle, no more McMansions but also no more squalor.

[–] IttihadChe@lemmy.ml 41 points 2 days ago (18 children)

We are already more productive than any other time in history and we don't have a 4 day work week.

If we did get a 4 day work week, the owners would not scale our pay to accommodate for less hours on the job. 15/hr over 50 hours would turn into 15/hr over 40 hours, not 18.75/hr over 40 hours.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Suppose that, at a given moment, a certain number of people are engaged in the manufacture of pins. They make as many pins as the world needs, working (say) eight hours a day. Someone makes an invention by which the same number of men can make twice as many pins as before. But the world does not need twice as many pins: pins are already so cheap that hardly any more will be bought at a lower price. In a sensible world, everybody concerned in the manufacture of pins would take to working four hours instead of eight, and everything else would go on as before. But in the actual world this would be thought demoralizing. The men still work eight hours, there are too many pins, some employers go bankrupt, and half the men previously concerned in making pins are thrown out of work. There is, in the end, just as much leisure as on the other plan, but half the men are totally idle while half are still overworked. In this way, it is insured that the unavoidable leisure shall cause misery all round instead of being a universal source of happiness. Can anything more insane be imagined?

--Bertrand Russell, In Praise of Idleness

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

i feel like capital vol 1 should be read by everyone.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

A 4 day work week wouldn’t change anything for people working an hourly wage.

This is talking about redefining ‘full-time’ at a legislative level from being 36 hours to something less.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I recall one of the ways to enforce a 4 day workweek was to enforce OT starting at 32 hours.

You could keep working 40+ hrs a week but it would hit the owners wallets.

Combine that with raising minimum wage and you're getting closer to UBI.

Neither one would help me I think being salary and around medium working class.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They don't even enforce OT over 40 for salaried positions.

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

That's my point...

[–] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That'll just make employers hire more employees with less hours.

[–] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 1 points 22 hours ago

Which is a good thing isn't it? Less overworked people and less unemployment

load more comments (1 replies)

Corporate will do anything but. Part time pay, no full time benefits, no pay raise, and now you need a second job.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Bernie always has terrible solutions to his valid criticisms of oligarchism. It should be illegal to work 5 days? Or more hours no matter the pay?

UBI is only empowering of people solution to US empire/oligarchism. Work as much as you want, with the power to say fuck you if conditions are not good enough for you. Cheer on AI/Robot productivity gains as it increases your UBI.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

He doesn't get it at all. AI making people more productive means they can work more and you don't have to pay them as much.

Sincerely, billionaires

😒

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Improved efficiencies should mean we all benefit across all sectors and ways of life.

But improved efficiencies actually mean none of us benefit except those at the top. We should all of us be paid more, have more time off, and have more excess - but at a high level we are all paid no extra, we get no extra time off, we get no excess - that all gets enjoyed by those at the top.

This is one of many reasons this should be a class war, not a culture war.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 days ago

I don't disagree. Few people are better positioned to help make that a reality, however.

load more comments
view more: next ›