this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2025
666 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

73287 readers
6103 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 day ago

Remember:

Copyright law as a whole will stay the same. In the court of law, you will need to prove that you indeed operate a very big AI company that indeed does AI things before they will let you off the hook for massive copyright infringement. You can't just use that excuse casually! Rules will be for thee, not the actual AI-companees.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 11 points 1 day ago

That's right, I'm torrenting all this stuff for my AI program...

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago
> law passes
> buy servers
> create piracy site
> call it AIbay
> have all kinds of things there under a synonymous name
> when interrogated tell them you have a proprietary technology that you won't release to competitors
[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 38 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"I need it for my business plan to work out" is not a great legal argument for when you're trying to override others rights.

[–] javiwhite@feddit.uk 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So what you're telling me is it's still a legal argument.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 27 points 2 days ago

Funny that when it was about protecting profits copyright was such a cornerstone principle but when it's about protecting profits it can also be set aside.

[–] Jeffool@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Holding companies responsible for the infringement of them using copyrighted materials without restitution to the creator is literally the only tool we have in ever changing current copyright laws, and we're watching it be waved away.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago

"You can't be expected to get a successful higher education when every article, book, or anything else that you've read or studied, you're supposed to pay for."

[–] atk007@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (3 children)

So Pro Piracy argument ... So no more patents or copyrights

[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not for you, silly, only if you're too rich and big!

[–] markon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Big-league bigly its a big fucking club and we ain't in. It

[–] TeddE@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

I'll setup a JellAIfin server immediately. It's just the regular Jellyfin code, but I am compiling my own version - it has "AI" added as a comment to every line of code before I compiled.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There was an episode of behind the bastards I was listening to a while back where they mentioned some dude who was using an AI tool to scrape the internet to steal other people's art, so people started doing something that prevented him from optimally stealing their art.

I can't remember what exactly, but the guy started whining that whatever people were doing was "illegal" bc it was damaging his tool he was using to steal other people's shit for his own profit. Like somebody telling you that it's illegal to prevent them from efficiently stealing your property bc it interferes with their livelihood. How dare you!

Anyway, that's the kind of vibes I get from this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Time to ignore all the copyright and patents for my own ~~nefarious purposes~~ AI training

[–] amikulo@slrpnk.net 11 points 2 days ago

How am I supposed to train my neural network (my own brain) to be a filmmaker if I have to pay for each piece of media I train on (watch)?

[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago

"I am ~~hosting a pirate bay instance~~ AI" foolproof.

[–] nthavoc@lemmy.today 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Looks like it's Sam Altman's turn to ram his hand up there to make the puppet talk now. That is word for word what that tech douche nozzle says.

This is definitely what that is, but I take it this also means he's saying pirating is ok for people and not just tech corporations. Safe to assume? Bc otherwise it just seems like more entitled rich fucks making the rules for everyone else that they can ignore

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 34 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Trying to throw whatever that sticks so people would stop talking about your pedophelia

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 383 points 3 days ago (13 children)

Wow so fuck college students but machines deserve free textbooks?

Fuck this society.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 145 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Just tell your campus book store that you self-identify as AI. FREE BOOKS!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz 75 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Just download digital copies of the textbooks and say you need them as training material for your own AI dataset when the copyright holders come after you.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don't spend one more dollar on educational material. If a person had to pay for every textbook and online subscription, education would be impractical.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

"you can't have a successful government when every time I want to be President or have sex with minors or anything else you have the right to do as a rich, white man, you have to hear people get all judgy"

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 54 points 2 days ago (4 children)

So why can't I read them for free too? Only massive billion dollar companies get stuff for free?

I would like to announce that I am pioneering a new AI program. Give me access to all of the movies for free please.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 209 points 3 days ago (3 children)

🙌 Communist Trump is making all textbooks free 🙌

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 58 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago

He sure is 'getting rid of woke'. I've never seen a more ignorant man.

[–] ToadOfHypnosis@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

It’s amazing he can talk at all with both the dick and balls of every Nerd Reich billionaire he can find wedged into his mouth.

[–] JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

Can a human be expected to have a successful life when they have to pay for knowledge they need access to? I am not against the opinion that information should be free and freely accessible. But does this courtesy also extend to the common folk or is it exclusive to expensive machines and their owners? You wouldn’t download a United States government. da-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 54 points 2 days ago (2 children)

How about you release the Epstein files and then go outside and go fuck yourself Trump.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago
[–] Steve@startrek.website 148 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] db2@lemmy.world 68 points 3 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)

"Piracy for me, not for thee."

[–] notso@feddit.org 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

In a statement given during a press conference in the Oval Office, the president's stance on the topic was clear:

"I'm a big reader, some say the biggest ever. And let me tell you - when you go into a bookstore, they have books costing like insane numbers, like 100.000 Dollars each minimum. Its an absolute disgrace. You have all these authors getting billions just for putting funny little characters on paper. The democrats... They jacked up the price so much, especially under Obama together with the crooked Clintons and sleepy Joe Biden, they were all in this room when it happened, they were all together. Its a shame. They did the same thing with eggs but I brought prices down like, immediately. Immediately. So fast everybody said "Wow" Because they never saw something like that and I will do the same for these books and newspapers. But all these writers and journalists, who are all producing propaganda for the radical left by the way, they are really terrible people - they're earning trillions... I was speaking to Mr. ChatGPT the other day and he said "They're ripping us off, Mr. President it's a totally broken market, they are killing us." And I agree, it's a disgrace. A total disgrace. That's why I'll bring prices down by not only 100 % or 200 %, but probably more like 1,000 % in the next two weeks. You'll never have seen lower prices for medication, let me tell you... And books too. So there will be big price cuts. Bigly."

/s

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It took me a bit to realize this wasnt an actual quote from Trump

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] StowawayFog@piefed.social 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Won’t someone think of these POOR AI companies!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 41 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hear that college students? The President just gave you permission to pirate all your textbooks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sam Altman approves this message.

Hundred percent he got a script from a lobbyist to create this sound bite.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tonytins@pawb.social 122 points 3 days ago (5 children)

If only he were capable of being so consistent. He thinks what people pay him to think.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 72 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Remember kids: Copyright is only for the rich.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Alloi@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

"you cant POSSIBLY expect us, to respect HUMAN RIGHTS if we want progress? i mean the survival of the human species (me and my friends) relies on cheap and free labour and the starvation, death, and exploitation of the masses. if we want to SURVIVE as a species (me and my friends) WE GOTTA EXPLOIT THE PEOPLE"

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 47 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And that's why I have an AI training library of movies and TV stored up.

I'll get around to training an AI on it any day now, I'm sure.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 84 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So what he’s saying is the billionaires funding ai can’t afford to do it legitimately

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vane@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

This basically means some people are now owned by corporations or at least everything they do is owned by them.

load more comments
view more: next ›