this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2025
642 points (98.3% liked)

politics

25075 readers
2575 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

After months of sharply criticizing President Donald Trump’s actions, decisions and rhetoric, the left-leaning MeidasTouch Podcast overtook the Joe Rogan Experience for the first time last week, according to YouTube’s weekly ranking of top podcast shows.

While Rogan’s 20.1 million YouTube followers dwarf MeidasTouch’s 5.2 million, the podcasting giant’s show finished in second place. Progressive YouTuber Brian Tyler Cohen and conservative-leaning Sean Ryan’s shows also made the top ten.

The MeidasTouch Podcast saw its rankings climb in July as Trump attempted to appease Congress, the media, and voters over his administration’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, with episodes zeroing in on the president’s past ties to and comments about the disgraced financier.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Cool, but what I dislike about the MeidasTouch is how they seem to prop up the importance of something against Trump when it's usually something that isn't going to make him flinch. They are giving people a false sense of security when people should be realizing that they will need a revolution to get out of fascism.

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

"This Bombshell ruling will be the end of Trump"

Goes into 12 minute video and then says it likely won't change anything.

[–] CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.cafe 3 points 5 hours ago

"THE WALLS ARE CLOSING IN"

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 hours ago

People need to start somewhere, and sometimes smaller acts of defiance can grow

[–] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 12 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Clickbait works. If that's what it takes to get promoted in the algorithm and compete with the right-wing garbage, then so be it. It's better than the right-wing garage being presented unopposed.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

That may be the point and reason, but that doesn't eliminate the negative side of it. You won't find me defending clickbait or divisive social network algorithms putting people into their own bubbles, that's what got us into this problem in the first place and it's just going to keep waddling societies from extremes to extremes.

[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 23 hours ago

He doesn't cares about nothing and understands less, so your criticism is that they just don't attack his ego 100% of the time.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 15 points 23 hours ago

Does anyone remember the simpler times where Phillip de Franco was relevant and TYT was leftist? Sigh. The internet is dying.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

JOE ROGAN: the guy (who's opinion I could not care less about) that would RATHER VISIT RUSSIA than CANADA.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's "whose" and it looks like you CARE A LOT?

[–] Neverclear@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

Whose that now?

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I’m glad Meidas is surging in popularity but the bros are fucking annoying at times.

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

the eternal struggle, fascists will kill everyone but liberals are sort of annoying, who do i support?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 5 points 18 hours ago

The children (TikTokkers) yearn for annoying podcast hosts

[–] F_OFF_Reddit@lemmy.world 126 points 1 day ago (19 children)

I have no fucking idea why people watch Rogan, he's not particularly well versed in anything other than martial arts, he's not brilliant or even well spoken or educated by any stretch of the imagination... it feels to me as if he became popular because the average idiot finds this interesting but in reality he's just talking about nonsensical themes with some guests that, surprisingly, are quite well educated themselves.

I'll always remember this man as the crazed idiot who screamed bloody murder at a zoologist because her findings, research and experience contradicted what he wanted to showcase so at that moment he truly showed who he was.

[–] CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.cafe 1 points 5 hours ago

I don't listen regularly at all, but I think that's the entire point. He's not well versed or brilliant, and he brings on people that are or have a great story to tell, and he is supposed to bring it out of them. That's all it is, it's a conversation.

One of my friends that listens regularly once told me that he likes the format, there's a guy with a topic & it's explored but they meander off into side conversations. It feels very natural & isn't forced.

[–] Khlo@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 hours ago

What's this story about the zoologist?

[–] MisterNeon@lemmy.world 114 points 1 day ago (1 children)

he's not brilliant or even well spoken or educated by any stretch of the imagination

That's the point. He's the average American idiot. I grew up with legions of these guys. He got people to eat bugs in the 2000s for insane ratings.

The masses are garbage people.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don’t think there’s anything wrong with listening to people that aren’t smart for podcasts. I listen a lot to sports podcasts that are just 2 people shooting the shit about random things.

Now it IS a problem if you base your political identity and take voting advice from them yes. Joe Rogan should not be someone ever reported on by CNN.

But saying that every podcaster has to have a PHD is a bit heavy handed.

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Right? I listen to Regulation Podcast and MBMBAM, sometimes you need a break from seriousness

[–] Carvex@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago

He’s like a friend’s older brother who isn’t educated but tells coolbro stories and conspiracies with no backing. It’s edgy and cool if you’re 14 with no life experience, but besides that it’s just noise which helped Yamtits get elected.

[–] TJDetweiler@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Rogan used to have great stuff on his show pre-covid, especially MMA talks. He even had a great episode with Michael Osterholm at the beginning of the pandemic.

Shortly after that, he 180'd on his vaccine stance, and moved from Cali to Texas. Since then, he's been a total conservative pundit.

I've long since kicked Rogan from anything I listen to, but there was a time where he was entertaining, and did have great guests. Some of his "talking nonsense" was kind of what made his show fun, when it was harmless. Now he spreads misinformation and perpetuates brainrot in young men.

[–] cuerdo@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I am in the same boat.

Joe Rogan was a good interviewer, he is humble and unassuming and gives enough space to the guest to share. If you are into the guest, then you will enjoy it, I really enjoyed his interview on Tarantino and a few others.

It is also nice when he interviews comedians, since you can see the camaraderie and some of them are really funny, like Chapelle, Burr or CK. It is very interesting to listen to them if they are given space.

I stopped to listen when it became obvious that he is monetizing or capitalizing all the audience he has gained over the years. He is not a neutral commentator, he is a pundit with an agenda and he is making bank on it. That has degraded the image I had of him to the image I have of people as O'Reilly or the Bow-Tie guy.

It is a shame but I will not listen to anything from his show on principle.

[–] EtAl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

For me, it was the episode when he had Tim Pool on with the Twitter executives. Pool was like "Twitter discriminates against conservatives" and Vijaya Gadde was like "Moderation is not discrimination". Rogan did realize his mistake five minutes into the episode, but he showed just how impressionable he was. The whole show lost the allure after that. There's a thin line between curious and gullible.

[–] cuerdo@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

I don't mind gullible. I think that is just part of his persona.

What I mind is that he is a dishonest and malicious manipulator.

It became obvious in his political commentary that he was subjective on purpose with an agenda, that means he is being paid one way or another.

When he finally endorsed Trump, it became undeniable.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 day ago (3 children)

People also like McDonald's and coca cola ...... even when they have runaway diabetes.

The popularity of something or someone is just a barometer of the general intelligence of a population ..... and judging by what's happening in the US, it's a very low level indeed.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't really care for either, and I'm particularly politically minded and listen to podcasts almost exclusively. They just aren't very interesting or funny, the two things I need in a podcast. What's the appeal, rage?

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Rage seems to win elections.

[–] tylerkdurdan@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I tend to keep the news and such to more straightforward broadcasts like stuff from NPR. Otherwise, I'm quite partial to Citation Needed and their other show God Awful Movies (which is atheist stuff making fun of religious and woo movies).

And if I'm in a more mindless mood, I've been listening to Comedy Bang Bang lately which has existed since the beginning of time. Improv with guests, basically, which makes it pretty hit or miss depending on how it lands.

(Also other suggestions are good too. There's so many better options than midas lol)

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

You might like The Daily Beans (with Allison Gill and Diana Goldberg)

I’ve been finding the tone “you’re not alone” tone of anger to be… helpful.

I like Crooked Media's Pod Save the World.

Sometimes Pod Save America, but thats probably more interesting for someone living in the US. I can't listen to it more than maybe once a month.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Incredibly misleading title and also Who?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MisterNeon@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Wait, how is he dethroned? The article states Rogan has more watchers/viewers.

For the record I hate that bald turd.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 41 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] MisterNeon@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (4 children)

You're right. They kind of buried it.

According to data analyzed by Newsweek using podcast analytics platform Podscribe, the MeidasTouch Podcast was the most downloaded podcast overall between June 7 and July 7.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Ugh. Rightwing liberals under a veneer of anti establishment

But also, I don't trust these rankings. Downloads of episodes versus streaming on YT versus the app versus follower counts. It's all very apples to oranges.

What I can say positively, is that The Majority Report gets about as many live viewers as Meidas touch an YT, and has for much longer as a genuinely progressive outlet. Likewise, for better or worse, TYT has also been putting up those kinds of numbers for a very long time.

But it is interesting to me to see MT bump JRE. It does say something about a turning tide.

load more comments
view more: next ›