593
submitted 11 months ago by spaceghoti@lemmy.one to c/politics@lemmy.world

A court-ordered financial auditor has caught Donald Trump quietly moving $40 million from the Trump Organization into a personal bank account—seemingly so the former president could pay his whopping $29 million tax bill.

Trump isn’t supposed to be moving any money around without alerting Barbara S. Jones, a former federal judge in New York tasked with babysitting the Trump Organization for its relentlessly shady business practices. But on Wednesday, she notified a New York state court about some major bank transfers that were never brought to her attention by the Trumps.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 338 points 11 months ago

Cool cool cool, that’s just great. So there are going to be immediate legal consequences, right???

Fuck I’m so tired of this.

[-] noride@lemm.ee 104 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Oh yes yes, consequences aplenty! They are facing a fine of several thousand dollars here! Justice at long last!!

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 51 points 11 months ago

You forgot the strongly worded reprimand. He'll think twice next time.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 36 points 11 months ago

Susan Collins thinks he has already leaned his lesson.

[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 63 points 11 months ago

I'm honestly starting to think he was sent to us as some sort of test to see how much bullshit we'll put up with before we revolt, and we're fucking failing.

[-] Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works 31 points 11 months ago

Makes me think of Vault 11 from Fallout New Vegas where the population has to sacrifice one person every year or everyone would be killed.

Only it was a test and if they refused then nobody is killed. But they send sacrifices for almost 200 years.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

But on Wednesday, she notified a New York state court

Just how fast you want them to move?! This was reported to the court TODAY.

[-] Yearly1845@reddthat.com 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

And he stole classified documents three years ago. He orchestrated a failed coup three years ago too. At the rate this is going he's going to be elected grand emperor and he will just dismiss the cases against him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Wake me up if he’s in a high max security prison with an orange jumpsuit and a tear tattooed next to his eye

[-] Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

the legal ramifications for Trump is so great, that it’ll spill over to people who shouldn’t be in trouble but sadly had the letter ‘T’ in their name. So sorry Tommy and Tina, you’re going to jail cause our Orange Idiot is too rich.

Oh, you too Anthony and Bridgette, don’t think we didn’t see those T’s hiding!

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 124 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

So again….. why is he not in prison again?

EDIT: I’d love for the cowards that are downvoting this to stand up, be counted, and speak their mind.

[-] Kbin_space_program@kbin.social 54 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Because the US has never had a former president get caught so badly and there isn't precedent for this.

Particularly in that he's running for president again, is the presumptive GOP nominee based on poll data, and the Supreme Court is functionally in his pocket.

[-] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 68 points 11 months ago

That last part is important. Courts are bending over backwards to accommodate him, because they don’t want to give him any way to claim his trials were unfair. You can only appeal a ruling on the basis of mistrial. Basically, you have to show the appeals court that your previous trial was unfair in some way. So the lower courts are doing everything they can to avoid giving him ammo for that appeal.

Because the lower courts know that if it successfully gets appealed, the courts get exponentially more conservative as they go up. So his chances of getting away with it dramatically increase with each subsequent appeal. And if it makes it all the way to the SCOTUS, they’ll happily light the constitution on fire to let him walk. So their best chance is to nip it in the bud now, by making the courtroom proceedings as appeals-proof as possible. And the only way to do that is to avoid seeming unfair at every opportunity.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

In a legal sense, it's only unprecedented if you start from the assumption that the law doesn't apply to former presidents the way it does to anyone else.

The real issue is they've never tried to prosecute a tinpot dictator with an army would-be terrorists and a bunch of collaborators in key positions in the federal government.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

*Because the US is a kleptocracy masquerading as a democracy.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

There is precedent, the GOP just likes to forget that. Ulysses S Grant was prosecuted as a sitting president. It was for a misdemeanor of "speeding on horseback while in the city limits of Washington DC," but that just reinforces that we absolutely can and will prosecute even a sitting president for minor crimes, much less a "former president," which is just a normal citizen, for 96 felonies.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ericisshort@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

I’m no fan of the current court, but to say it’s in Trump’s pocket is ludicrous. If they were, they would not have rejected his election challenge appeals related to the 2020 election.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] steve_floof@lemm.ee 12 points 11 months ago

The prisons are full and my guillotine is hungry

[-] AlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago

Guillotines are ment to minimize pain. Might I suggest a reel of high test fishing line and 1995 Suzuki Samurai.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[-] ryrybang@lemmy.world 52 points 11 months ago

Not just a tax bill, but insurance bills and attorney bills for the Carroll case.

But the rest apparently went to cover Trump’s mounting legal costs following a searing jury verdict in May that determined he sexually assaulted the journalist E. Jean Carroll—and slapped him with a $5 million penalty.

“I have also confirmed that the other transfers were for insurance premiums and to an attorney escrow account,” Jones wrote, referencing the Carroll case.

What a guy.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

I feel like there should be a little more headlines about that, but after typing this who am I kidding? Thats not gonna damage him in anyway.

[-] Transcendant@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Does this imply that his funds generated from begging to his supporters are drying up?

I'm under no illusion that it'd be due to change 9f heart, but maybe they're tapped out at this stage.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RiikkaTheIcePrincess@pawb.social 44 points 11 months ago

Weird headlines for days around here O.o I had to come see what was going on because "Trump caught paying taxes" just sounds like a joke 😅

The only really surprising thing I see is that he's paying taxes at all. Also, what's the difference between quietly and loudly moving $40 million around? I honestly have no idea what kind of sound that makes.

[-] spaceghoti@lemmy.one 45 points 11 months ago

He's under an injunction against quietly transferring funds around in case he tries to hide it. Let's be honest, he probably has accounts he hasn't declared that should be accounted for. If it's a legitimate expense all he had to do was let the observer know what he was doing and why. But instead he did it hoping it wouldn't be noticed.

He's a moron.

[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 34 points 11 months ago

Because of the financial fraud trial involving the company, they're required to notify the judge anytime they move money around. "Quietly" in this case means they didn't do that.

[-] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 19 points 11 months ago

I think 'quietly' is standing on for 'fraudulently' here.

[-] wildcardology@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

That's how they got Al Capone, for tax evasion.

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 38 points 11 months ago

Stop it, you're killing me....Next you'll tell me he's disseminated classified materials to foreign nationals.

[-] Neato@kbin.social 9 points 11 months ago

Keeping secret materials in your pool house bathroom is something from a scrapped episode of Arrested Development.

[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 37 points 11 months ago

It would be cool if he actually got punished for being the con-artist he is.

[-] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 24 points 11 months ago

45 for prison 2024

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago
[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 28 points 11 months ago

He does now. Most of his ability to dodge taxes is either under investigation or shut down right now. Being under 91 active indictments isn’t the best time to be cheating on your taxes, but this is Trump after all…

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

Lock him the fuck up already.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

I wish there was some way to cut off any funds to him via fundraising and crowdfunding. John Barron spent years lying about his wealth and now his supporters act like he's some kind of charity case. Do they even hear themselves when they justify sending a so-called billionaire their cash?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
593 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19090 readers
3976 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS