this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2025
788 points (99.9% liked)

politics

25720 readers
3491 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 254 points 2 days ago (22 children)

I hope he goes off on the Trump administration like they are a deep-dish pizza.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 166 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Hopefully more hosts follow and point out the major hypocrisy from MAGA. The fact that ABC/Disney flinched from such a small jab really shows how stupid this entire thing is.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 134 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They didn’t flinch, they gleefully collaborated.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes they should all have their heads shaven after we've ended the occupation.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I fear one big problem with them flinching so quickly is that it gives the Trump cult plausible deniability to not blame the dictatorship for doing the things that they are doing.

I mean, the government did not censor Kimmel, it was a business decision made by a private entity. Right? RIGHT??

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 hours ago

It was actually a Trump supporter who owns ABC affiliate stations.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Hopefully more hosts follow and point out the major hypocrisy from MAGA.

That will do nothing. They enjoy their own hypocrisy. They don't care about consistency of principles and are quite happy to just want everything their way while no one else gets anything. They're quite happy to abuse language by saying whatever suits them in the moment. It drives their opponents crazy as they try to point out how inconsistent and irrational they're being. The fascists don't care, but they do love to see you get frustrated. It's just part of their sadistic fun: messing with people, playing with their prey until they are ready to exterminate them.

To complain that fascists are hypocritical or inconsistent is to miss the point of fascism, at least if your hope is to shock them into being more reasonable. I know this quote from Sartre is everywhere but he said it well:

Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 88 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

is there a retired gifs com, because yeah. damn

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ileftreddit@piefed.social 84 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Section 326 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 326, explicitly declared that nothing in the statute

shall be understood or construed to give the Commission the power of censorship over the [broadcast] communications or signals transmitted by any [broadcast] station, and no regulation or condition shall be promulgated or fixed by the Commission which shall interfere with the right of free speech by means of [over-the-air] broadcast communication.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 52 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Nothing matters when there are no checks and balances.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago

Well, there are checks being written behind closed doors and vast changes to financial balances

The checks are counterfeit and the balances have been tampered with

[–] laranis@lemmy.zip 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How cute, thinking the rules matter.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 60 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Talking about Constitutional Law in the modern day feels more and more like you're becoming a Sovereign Citizen. Waving around a piece of paper and screaming "You don't have the right to do that!" at a room full of men with tasers and guns and handcuffs.

[–] laranis@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 days ago

This is the best take yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

Just another rule they break on a regular basis. It is 100% intentional

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 91 points 2 days ago (13 children)

Are you ready to call it fascism yet Jon?

[–] SirMaple__@lemmy.ca 88 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

When Colbert was cancelled he did a great show. Even did a song and dance. It would be great if Kimmel is on tonight's show with Stewart.

https://youtu.be/TwOLo_U6bTw?t=1506

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Logistically it would be hard to have Kimmel on The Daily Show this evening. Kimmel is in LA and Jon is in New York. Obviously a video call is possible. Obviously flights exist. It would be wild if it happened, but it's not likely.

[–] SGGeorwell@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Rich people can fly anywhere on extremely short notice. It’s called NetJets

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 days ago
[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I hope he has Kimmel on as a guest.

e: his guest was even more relevant

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 2 days ago (14 children)

Run for president Jon. Do it.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 hours ago

A Jew? Good luck with that.

[–] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 31 points 2 days ago (5 children)

You guys need to stop electing celebrities ffs

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 2 days ago (11 children)

You need to understand politics better at a fundamental level. Lawyers do not make winning modern politicians. Theater majors do. Charismatic business majors do.

Jon just happens to also know shit from decades of calling out corruption and pushing for change.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 days ago

You guys need to stop electing celebrities ffs

You're not wrong, but I don't see a lot of better options on the table and the guy at the very least understands politics and seems to be resistant to being owned.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 days ago

At least John has a history of fighting to make Congress do the right thing. He has far more relevant political experience than Trump.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If we're picking celebrities to run, I nominate Tom Morello.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] s@piefed.world 27 points 2 days ago

True comedy and spite would be to just recite Kimmel’s monologue verbatim

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (8 children)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Steve@startrek.website 21 points 2 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›