this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2025
600 points (99.0% liked)

Science Memes

16827 readers
5073 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] foggianism@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

People in America who use pipet tips: probably 10k People who use plastic straws: 300 mil

[–] brianary@lemmy.zip 20 points 2 days ago (9 children)

The straw thing seems like such an inconsequential place to start over things like switching to bar soap and bar shampoo to avoid using so many plastic bottles.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

All you need to do is walk on the side of a busy road and look in the ditch to see what people just throw away.

It's not a lot of shampoo bottles, but tons of plastic cups and accompanied straws.

[–] brianary@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anecdotes aren't a great way to measure this. Observations like this are variable by location, and ignores the much larger mass in landfills or unrecycled stockpiles.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

And observations of landfills or unrecycled stockpiles doesn't vary by location?

The idea was to try and remove plastic waste that people tend to just throw away without thinking much of it. Lab students don't exactly take pipets with them and throw away in a ditch. But unfortunately, way too many people just throw away single use plastics like straws, cutlery, cups, "paper plates", etc.

[–] brianary@lemmy.zip 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't make any such "observations", or even claim that it doesn't vary by location. I'm just pointing out that your approach ignores a lot of much larger plastic masses. It's ok for identifying some obvious opportunities, but I'd hesitate to call it definitive for the purposes of establishing the most impactful strategy.

I'm not sure if people's unmindfulness is responsible for a larger share of waste than indifference, but maybe?

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not ignoring anything. But if you want me to cover every single issue and aspect of various types of trash management, it's gonna be a god damn university essay, I don't even think lemmy would allow so many characters in a comment.

Peoples "unmindfulness" is responsible for every single piece of garbage you see around you. When I walk down the road and see a bag of crisps laying around. That's because a person just tossed it. And no. I'm not ignoring corporate waste or pollution, criminal or otherwise. But that isn't the topic right now.

This specific post was making fun of the straw bans vs other single use plastics that are seemingly fine. straws vs pipets used in labs. And what I said was that pipets are not being littered around every corner of the globe. But straws are. That's why movements to ban such implements are ongoing. That's why we have movements to ban single use plastics like straws and cutlery, while a plastic shampoo bottle is still "fair game" since they're not typically just tossed in nature.

That doesn't mean I'm just ignoring everything else. We also didn't talk about how armed robberies are bad. But I can assure you, I'm not ignoring them, they're just not the topic at hand.

[–] brianary@lemmy.zip 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Look, all I'm saying is that straws probably aren't the #1 source of discarded plastic, and it seems like focusing on one thing like that results in more performative than substantive change.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the good old, "It's not the #1 problem so why bother doing anything". It's that wonderful kind of attitude that simply doesn't get anything done, ever. Because there's always a bigger problem.

The only ones focusing on one thing like plastic straws, are people like you. The rest of us moved on

[–] brianary@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Jesus, you presume too much.

Point to where I said not to do anything. My whole point was not to just stop at straws and find more ways to avoid plastic.

Maybe spend less energy on literal strawmen.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago

I just love how you think I'm presuming too much, only to in the very next sentence assume I think removing plastic straws being the end of the road and final solution.

And since I according to you, presume too much, did you want me to spend less energy on, literally, making straw-men (plural), like, scare-crows? Or did you mean that I should spend less energy on figuratively, straw-manning.

I would assume the latter but you are, literally, formulating the former. Either way. I'm not doing either of those things.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How much shampoo are you going through???

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Think of it in scale. It's not just you. It's millions of people. Even if every household only used one bottle over one year that still would be tons of tons of (easily to avoid) waste. And of course it's a lot more than one bottle a year.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because you can't say the same thing about straws or other single use plastics?

[–] brianary@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How much plastic is in a bottle of shampoo vs a straw, even averaged by day?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sounds like that's something you should have the numbers on if you're making the claim.

[–] brianary@lemmy.zip 0 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Yeah that's a reasonable expectation. I'll just start a massive study to see if people use so many straws that it outweighs every other use of plastic in their life. You've totally got me there. Congrats.

Edit: That was sarcasm. The burden of proof that straws are the most impactful discarded plastic is on you, not on my skepticism of it.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] SARGE@startrek.website 149 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I used to work in a warehouse that made a HUGE deal about the employees using the proper recycling bin so the company can get a nice check from somewhere or other for "going green"

This warehouse recieved thousands of pallets every day.

Each pallet is wrapped with hundreds of square feet of plastic wrap.

Each box is individually wrapped with maybe 10ftsq-50 depending on size.

Each box contains goods in plastic bags. Many of them with plastic clamshell packaging.

The products get unwrapped, and placed in larger boxes on shelves.

When the items get distributed to stores, the items were put in plastic bags, boxed up and wrapped in plastic wrap, boxes placed on pallets that were automatically wrapped by machines in hundreds of square feet of plastic.

None of the plastic from the warehouse floor is separated from the general waste.

Remember, it's your responsibility to reduce waste.

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 78 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I loathe the trend to blame the end consumer for their waste and eliminate very publicly visible things like straws when the vast majority is caused by industry every step of the way. The amount of plastic I see in retail garbage bins is sickening, and the average customer has no clue because it's all long before anything ends up on the shelf.

Then people stop using plastic cutlery and think they're helping the planet meanwhile it's just a facade to keep the real wasters off their radar.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Also, I would LOVE to buy stuff not wrapped in plastic, but it doesn't exist. There are no glass bottles of milk anymore, no soy-butcher

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Thorry@feddit.org 41 points 3 days ago

I've seen the same or even worse. Pallets of stuff would be received, all wrapped up tight in an ungodly amount of plastic. The pallet would be unwrapped, plastic discarded and the contents scanned to confirm the correct items and number of items were present on the pallet. After each item was scanned and it's serial number recorded, someone would go to validate the items. When validated and found to be correct, the items were again stacked on a pallet and wrapped by another ungodly amount of plastic. The terrible thing was, as I was outside of the distribution chain, I had a view on the bigger picture. Items would often go through several of these places, each doing the exact same. The amounts of plastic each item consumed in the process was huge. But it was necessary, errors were found often, so the steps needed to be done. And the pallets could often get wet, nobody would accept soggy cardboard, so it needed to be wrapped.

The issue is plastic is basically free and extremely good at what it does. A more permanent solution like encasing the goods in some other material, like wood or metal would be more expensive and do a worse job. It's similar to asbestos, where the solution is so good, nothing else can compete. It took a mighty effort and strict laws to mostly abandon asbestos. I fear humanity has lost its will to live and won't have it in us to ban single-use plastic.

Some places did use metal trollies instead of pallets, but the pallets were never really a problem. They were almost always made from sustainable woods, be re-used often, till they just about fell apart. After which they were sent out for recycling, either back into a refurbished pallet, or a stamped recycled wood pallet or other recycled wood product.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago

It'd be great if more and more companies packaged their foods through EcoEnclose or similar.

It'd be even better if this was made default by legislation that eliminates the need for good will.

[–] dingus@lemmy.world 67 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I work in healthcare and sometimes I think about the amount of waste I generate in a day and it's wild

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 44 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Health of humans is always excluded from plastic reduction laws and for good reason.

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes, I would rather healthcare and science used 5x as much plastic as they do already and everyone else had to go completely wasteless than try to put any undue limits on them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] philpo@feddit.org 17 points 3 days ago

Tbf, I remember the times we reused everything, even tubes.

And it was a mess and there is so much evidence that the whole process of reusing is even worse for the environment.

[–] lengau@midwest.social 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Plastic recycling in the home is basically a scam, but at the scale of a hospital where you're generating large amounts of the same (known) plastic that's going in its own bin, it's much easier to recycle. I just bought a bunch of recycled PET that mostly came from medical waste.

[–] dingus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I mean, I've worked at a number of hospitals in the US and never seen a recycling receptacle for our waste. Our waste either goes in a biohazard bag to be incinerated, sharps containers to be disposed of (altho not sure in what way), or a regular trash can to presumably in a landfill.

Not sure if other countries are different, but I can't imagine they sort through our biohazard waste bags for plastic materials.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Recycling companies who ship bottles to India landfills/sea because recycling too expensive:

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago

LoL. Just autoclave them

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I recently saw paper straws for sale in a carboard box with a cutout so you could physically touch the straws. Naturally, I was revolted.

[–] bob_lemon@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

My headcanon says that this used to have a plastic window instead, until someone pointed out that having a plastic window in packaging of paper straws is ridiculous, so they decided to remove it. A package redesign without a window was also proposed, but was rejected for budgetary reasons.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Plastic nowadays is inevitable, but at least the use of biodegradable plastic made from modified natural pulps is growing. Plastic is just a generic term for artificial materials and not all of them are harmful, and a lot of these also can be easy recycled. PET are often converted to filaments for 3D printers or yarns for clothing. Bad only if they are thrown into nature or into the sea

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Ah, but you must see that recycling costs money! It’s cheaper to pretend you’re recycling and just throw it in the oceans and rivers and landscapes!

I hate it here. We even throw out online returns nearly 100% of the time for all it’s worth, it’s fucking crazy.

[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 39 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Its a matter of scale. If labs went through pipette tips the same way that fast food joints went through plastic straws, they'd be banned too.

[–] Squirrelsdrivemenuts@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago (3 children)

And we don't throw pipette tips in the ocean, we throw them in the biohazard box. While not better for the environment, at least we don't choke baby turtles.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

The lab is a much more controlled environment. I trust a lab tech to dispose of the tips as per protocol, which could reduce the number of tips that end up as litter.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JillyB@beehaw.org 15 points 3 days ago

No they wouldn't. Banning straws is politically expedient, not effective policy. Straws are a tiny drop in the bucket of plastic waste. But they're visible, largely optional, and have alternatives. It's easy to make them look bad so a politician can look big by banning them. Your average person can feel like they're making a difference by buying a reusable straw. The industrial scale plastic waste that happens out of sight is allowed to continue because nobody cares about actually doing anything. Everyone wants to feel like they're doing something.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 25 points 3 days ago

To avoid plastic waste, they use now paper straws ....wrapped individualy in plastic. Genius

[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago

lab rats who use a pipette robot that eats boxes of tips:

[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Straws don't pollute the oceans if you throw them in the trash. Well, unless that trash gets processed badly. Where I live trash gets burned. So I make sure to throw some straws in the river so the sea turtles can do coke off each others backs 😎

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›