this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2025
741 points (98.8% liked)

News

32565 readers
4558 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Nearly a third of Americans – 30% – say people may have to resort to violence in order to get the country back on track, according to the latest PBS News/NPR/Marist poll.

It’s a sharp rise from 18 months ago, when 19% of Americans said the same.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BCBoy911@lemmy.ca 10 points 56 minutes ago* (last edited 23 minutes ago)

Fundamentally, elections were designed to be a peaceful alternative to the peasantry revolting against the government and beheading their king. As Americans come to grip with the reality that their elections are meaningless, their politicians are bought and their only alternative to fascism is fascism-lite with a pride pin (no trans ppl allowed though) this attitude will continue to fester.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

You can't argue nazis out of your government. Churchill didn't convince Hitler to back out of Poland over a friendly cuppa.

[–] Paddy66@lemmy.ml 2 points 30 minutes ago

Peaceful general strikes would be a better first option imho

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 2 points 41 minutes ago

Trump certainly does, or at least it's what he claims.

Just because it will probably be, doesn't mean you have to initiate it first. Not only is there a lot of preparation that needs to go towards a revolution that isn't just arming and shooting, but it's also better if the other side is the one to initiate it first. First is getting rid of the delusion that the federal government hasn't been corrupted beyond repair, getting rid of the delusion that you can work inside a system that's now exponentially worse than it was 4 years ago and somehow fix it. Then you can look at your own history and where power can actually be consolidated, and begin preparing knowing you are working against compromised social networks with the next generation of Cambridge Analyticas so you can't rely on ignoring the elephant in the room.

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

America, you have the right to bear arms for a reason.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago

Guns do not protect you from Fox News.

I disagree with Lemmy (and the growing public sentiment), but for the opposite extreme reason: we are beyond violence changing things. This is a propaganda/reality war, and truth doesn’t really matter.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 37 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

Historically, it has always taken violence to remove fascists from power.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 19 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The problem with all of this is that the right is literally saying this exact same thing.

We dismiss it because it's ludicrous, because they HAVE all the power, their guy IS the deep state that controls everything, but our media world has fashioned a narrative for our stupidest segment that they're the oppressed underdogs.

Meaning, no matter what happens, even if we get our best outcome and drag this administration onto the White House lawn, we still have to live next to millions and millions of people who think we've been planning to do that to them for decades now.

There is no good solution that doesn't involve some kind of new leadership that needs to be built from the ground up and will likely take generations to nurture and develop.

[–] fishy@lemmy.today 3 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

So what though? If it gets to the point of having to violently overview the government, we're past the point of precedent. We can just use their beloved AI to scrub social media profiles and purge them from the voting registry. Sure they'll believe that was the plan all along, but we'd have a few decades where the scales were tipped so far in our favor that their children and grandchildren could be properly educated without all the revisionist bullshit.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

That's the key, right? You've gotta build a society afterwards that doesn't perpetuate the cycles of abuse and enlightens people with education. One that doesn't exploit anybody and doesn't have a class structure that divides people. That's the only way you can build a society that can reliably raise every child healthily. Any society that strives for equality like that will necessarily have to ignore the voices of those who want to hold it back.

[–] AAA@feddit.org 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

There's ample of evidence that a couple of decades to reeducate their children and grandchildren simply isn't enough or doesn't work.

We had a couple of decades to educate everyone about fascism,... and yet we're here.

[–] fishy@lemmy.today 4 points 1 hour ago

We allowed them to rewrite the history books. We're here because education was so fucking bad. I grew up in California and was taught that MLK's I have a dream speech solved racism in America and that the civil war was about states rights. There's lots of room for improvement.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Then you begin a thousand-year cycle of violence and reprisal for that violence until our great great great great grandchildren have no idea why they hate this group of people they live next to.

There's a precedent for this, you might have heard of it.

[–] ghosthacked@lemmy.wtf 3 points 2 hours ago

Facebook clowns laughed at me when I said that you can vote in fascism, but you have to shoot your way out.

[–] donalonzo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Not always. The Portuguese carnation revolution happened without violence. Spain democratised right after Franco's death.

[–] MathiasTCK@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

So violence, military coup or heart failure?

[–] _AutumnMoon_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

violence is already happening, it's just that people are too scared to fight back against it

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 7 points 10 hours ago

not only that people not close to areas of violence are still too content, because they have thier creature comforts with them.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 hours ago

Haha, it'll never happen.
Most are too complacent, comfortable, and mollycoddled to do anything. They'll just try to wait it out and hope that it'll change at the next election ...not realising that if there is a next election that it'll probably be rigged, to quote the orange child rapist himself "you'll never need to vote again, we've got it sorted".

The daft thing is you don't need to have a massive civil war to end this bullshit. You just need some backbone and to target the orange paedo from all directions and not let him have any time or space to do his evil shit. Then once he's out, or dead from the inevitable stress induced heart attack, go after his cronies. He's the biggest manbaby that's ever lived, use it against him.

[–] kepix@lemmy.world 19 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago (2 children)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

you mean covert fascism. many of the elements were there, it's just out in the open now.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 5 points 9 hours ago

That's your interpretation, but this could also be an indicator of fascists becoming more violent. Which is terrifying.

[–] z3k3lon@lemmy.pt 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

How about not voting for soon to be dictators? Violence is not needed

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago

“If you just vote hard enough the people with all the money and power (who designed the system to let them keep all their money and power) will just hand over all their money and power. “

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 13 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

doing infrequent protests hasnt helped one bit especially if not large numbers like other countries do it, if the enemy knows you arnt going for thier HEADS, they will just laugh and move on.

also people are unwilling to boycott/generally strike, because they sitll have thier creature comforts, plus all the propaganda against protesters in general, i think the staged eco-protests(the ones that defaced public things, were funded by the oil/gas industry) over the years was just testing the waters.

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 24 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

This is exactly how it's being orchestrated. Pit the people against each other so the politicians and wealthy can get away with literal murder.

We are being governed by the "Epstein Elite", literal pedophiles and sex traffickers and the idiots that kneel to them.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 10 hours ago

culture wars crap= aka, anti-wokeness, antivaxx, anti-trans.

not class wars=billionaires vs the not .01%

[–] Inaminate_Carbon_Rod@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

If the people of America violently revolt en masse, I reckon it’s a 50-50 call if the military backs the Government or the People.

[–] FuckFascism@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The military would almost certainly split.

[–] Inaminate_Carbon_Rod@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

In which case the likely outcome would be the establishment of 2 separate counties?

Like East and West Germany? north and South Korea?

[–] FuckFascism@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

If it comes to a stalemate but I doubt it would, though I'm no expert on war. I was thinking it would just make a longer war. I've met plenty of military families and they all have different beliefs just like everyone.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 22 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

1775: Breaking News, there's a growing number of colonists who think violence is necessary...

[–] missfrizzle@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (5 children)

if this comes to violence, I will be slaughtered. not because I plan to fight, but because trans people have been so thoroughly villianized by the Right. I won't hurt a soul, but I expect to be hurt.

violence would be a catastrophe.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

It’s already happening. If I was trans I would be looking to flee the country ASAP. I wouldn’t even trust blue states to protect me.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 26 points 16 hours ago (19 children)

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago

It's worked to found the nation and gain independence. It worked to ensure slavery ended. It worked in both world wars. Americans have no problem using it in every single country in Latin America and the middle east. What's good for the goose...

[–] zululove@lemmy.ml 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Which track we talking about lol

load more comments
view more: next ›