this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2025
295 points (98.7% liked)

News

32785 readers
4209 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

WASHINGTON — White House officials have held increasingly serious discussions in recent days about President Donald Trump’s invoking the Insurrection Act, a rarely used 19th century law that gives the president the power to deploy active-duty troops inside the United States for law enforcement purposes, five people with knowledge of the talks told NBC News.

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 104 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"just one little reichstag fire, c'mon just one, that's all we need"

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

what we need is the same thing that killed hitler.

edit: clearly the joke bombed. i hope trump follows his leader when this is all done. but odds are he’ll pull a kissinger.

[–] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] flandish@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

where did you get that from my reply? lol. hint: what killed hitler?

[–] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 33 points 1 week ago (4 children)
[–] kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

yeah but he also killed the guy that killed hitler :/

[–] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 1 points 6 days ago

Hitlers all the way down.

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Best thing he ever did

I don't think Trump has the stones to put a gun to his head.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They kill themselves because they are cowards.

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It takes a surprising amount of courage to put a gun to your head and pull the trigger, speaking from experience. Or perhaps an equal amount of fear, but regardless it's not an easy decision to make, like taking a bunch of sleeping pills or sitting in the car in the garage while it runs.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 days ago

Speaking from experience, it's very easy to put a gun to your head and pull the trigger.

Mine didn't go off so I pulled it again against the pillow and it tore a hole right through it.

That's when I decided I wanted to live a little longer and saw it as a sign.

So I will say it again: it's the coward's way out because they can't face the consequences of their actions.

Don't give me this bullshit that it's very hard to do.

Much harder to face your accusers and death with them.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago
[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

Give a Nobel Peace Prize to the man who killed Hitler.. oh, wait!

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'm sure they knew what you meant but imagining you meant we need hitler is much funnier

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

well trump is indeed a minor hitler of the current era. bibi is a major one. but yeah.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] flandish@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

no. the same thing not timeline.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] flandish@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

we have one right now. trump.

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 74 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Dems will say “Don’t fight back, they’ll use it as an excuse.” Yet if they’re going to do it anyways might as well go down swinging rather than just roll over.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 57 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It fucking sucks, but it is really about waiting for The Moment.

Getting some baseball bats and rushing an ICE office? The news media will instantly villify it as an act of terrorism and most people will decide that they themselves hadn't noticed any problems so it probably was terrorism.

But when The People are sufficiently angry and are actually looking for an outlet? THAT is when that act of Resistance transforms from "terrorism" to "spark".

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

Look, .22 doesn't do a whole lot other than suppression. But I have A LOT

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I’m just annoyed that we’re all going to have to go through so much extra pain because of the stupids. And we’d DAMN WELL better prevent them from EVER having a say again after this. I don’t care if you call it anti-democratic, I don’t care if you call it Jim Crow, I don’t care if you try and argue slippery slope - these MAGAts need to be barred from voting ever again, and their particular brand of lying hate speech needs to be outlawed.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh. Be-fucking-lieve me, the things I want are things you don't type out ever.

But the problem is that a plurality of the voting populace in this country WANTED this shit. You can argue that they were too stupid to know what they were voting for but they still chose hate and bigotry

And while I sincerely doubt the Democrats will do anything (if they ever even get power again), you fundamentally can't do ANYTHING without the will of The People. Because... that voting plurality have already demonstrated that they will be much faster to engage in violence to get their way and the Democrats have already demonstrated they want to maximize "decorum"

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago

But the problem is that a plurality of the voting populace in this country WANTED this shit.

I mean not really when you take voter suppression and other tactics into account. That's not to even mention the handful of lawsuits from the election that are currently ongoing showing mathematical ilregularities, borderline impossibbilities.

[–] tomi000@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bypassing democracy to oppress your political opponents? Rings a bell

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 1 points 1 week ago

Call it Reconstruction.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago

That would carry a lot more weight if US citizens weren’t presented with dozens of wonderful opportunities to fix their shit which they still ignored. Stop waiting and do something you lazy cowards.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

On the other hand, they just invent their justifications, so let them do it, and then respond with massive destruction when they do it.

Trump has been telling everybody that Portland is "burning to the ground!" He often says to journalists "You've all seen it yourselves!" and they don't push back AT ALL.

So don't give them reasons, just let them do it, and when they do, then we have to crush every one of them in every way possible. Ruthless, no mercy at all.

Rather than cause trouble, just make it very clear to EVERY elected politician that if they support anything like the Insurrection Act or Marshall Law, they will pay for their support PERSONALLY, in every way possible. As long as America is under a MAGA siege, they will never be safe in their TREASON.

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My biggest concern with that is that the GOP is ruling like they already know they won’t be held to account in the next election. If the fix is already in we’re better off acting quickly rather than allowing them to continue to consolidate power.

[–] Cryan24@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago

Part of the Authoritarian playbook

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The one thing I've learned through his terms, especially this one, is if he is "talking" about doing something, there is an insanely high chance that it will be done. Be absolutely prepared for this to become reality.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trump’s plans to deploy the National Guard have occasionally hit legal hurdles. A federal judge in Oregon on Sunday blocked him from sending guard members from any state to Portland. The next day, Trump said publicly that he would invoke the Insurrection Act “if it was necessary.”

“If people were being killed and courts were holding us up or governors or mayors were holding us up, sure, I’d do that,” Trump said. As of now, he said, it has not been needed.

...

“Ultimately it’s the president’s vision and the president’s policies that he got elected to implement that the attorneys are just working hard to defend,” the White House official said. “We’re working hard to look at the law and say, ‘How do we achieve the president’s vision?’”

Trump considered invoking the act in his first term during the protests after George Floyd was killed in Minneapolis in 2020. He declined despite the urging of some allies and later regretted that decision, according to the senior administration official. He is viewing his current decision through that lens, the senior administration official said.

One of Trump’s deputy chiefs of staff, Stephen Miller, has been a leading and longtime proponent of invoking the Insurrection Act.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

basically his buried lede and dog whistle here is that he is setting up a manufactured consent: he wants an attack on an ice agent to happen so he can have an “excuse” to do this.

[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

That's how it reads to me too, accidentally saying "hurry up and riot already, something's gotta piss some of you off enough to do it".

Wild that this is where we are - our president trying to bait us into helping him justify massacring us.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago

Even the word "seriously" has lost all meaning.

I mean, what else were they if not dead serious since January, yet also absolutely ridiculous.

They could say they're serious and never do it. They could say they're only joking, then overdeliver tenfold.

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

How possible is it this is to hide, distract, cover the Epstein files release?

Would releasing the Epstein files show that trump is a traitor, criminal, and illegitimately elected to the presidency and must be removed from office?

Would this show the extent the Republicans are covering for him because it would make them look bad?

Would it show that our current executive branch and everyone nominated by trump should not be in their positions and any decisions and policies enacted should be reversed?

Would the conservative voter base see the true colors of who they voted for and the entire Republican party covering for this? Would this cause a little bit of chaos?

Sounds like a can of beans!

[–] borQue@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

The insurrection act is your ONLY way out of this misery. Orange Satan is doing everything to disrupt your country until it becomes a totalitarian demure sh*thole. And until now he succeeds with every step.

[–] selkiesidhe@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

The cringy snowflake just can't stand that many of us don't want to gargle his nasty balls...