this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2025
230 points (98.7% liked)

Fuck AI

4341 readers
1198 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Triumph@fedia.io 63 points 5 days ago (1 children)
  1. "Fully autonomous". Sure it is.
  2. "We can touch our community in ways we have never done before." I'm sure the community will feel especially touched and not at all intimidated by multiton robots rolling through their neighborhoods instead of, I dunno, actual people.
  3. I'm certain that when one of these maims someone, everyone will run to the head of the line to take responsibility and handle the situation with thoughtfulness and care.
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

By touch they mean surveillance

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 3 days ago

Neither of which is good. I don't want the police touching me or surveilling me.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago (5 children)

So its a police car driving around. What if someone actually needs help? What can just a car do?

This whole idea is so utterly stupid, I'm at loss of words.

[–] bcgm3@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

I was waiting the whole video for them to explain even one actually useful aspect of this idea, and at the very end a cop says "it can deploy a drone."

But wait that's dumb

[–] MrMcGasion@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago

It can't do anything to help anyone, but it's essentially a mobile Flock camera with license plate tracking and facial recognition. It's a privacy nightmare, and a massive legal liability for the city (Benn Jordan has an excellent video on his YouTube about Flock cameras and how bad they are). Best case scenario is it drives through a deep puddle during the next hurricane and shorts itself out.

[–] StopSpazzing@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

It'll run them over! Obviously. Easiesy way to solve any problem is to just run them all over.

[–] Digestive_Biscuit@feddit.uk 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I agree. I know your post was serious but I couldn't help thinking of that green goblin truck from that Stephen King movie where tech comes alive. I'm imagine a police car watching a crime in progress and revving it's engine to intimate them.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

that Stephen King movie where tech comes alive.

Maximum Overdrive.

[–] Digestive_Biscuit@feddit.uk 3 points 4 days ago

That's the one! Thank you

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 51 points 6 days ago (7 children)

Nothing that a can of paint or a bucket of tar couldn't fix.

Throw and run ... and the local department would have to spend an hour locating the vehicle to get people to it, then a few hours more towing it back, then days more to clean it up.

[–] KazuyaDarklight@lemmy.world 36 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Cleanup is absolutely a time burn, but let's also be real; they'll go straight to it via GPS tracking and unless you get the windshield real good, someone will just get in and manual drive it back to the station.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 10 points 5 days ago (2 children)

True .... but it might be time to figure out a liquid combination that stains or is slightly corrosive. You don't need to melt things, just corrosive enough to etch, mar or deform glass or plastics of sensor lenses.

You clean everything up but realize that the liquid has permanently damaged an imaging lens cover, either with deep stains or corrosion.

Then you replace it but then it costs money and time.

And you do it over and over again

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Hydrofluoric acid is really good at etching glass.

But it's also really good at eating your bones.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 14 points 5 days ago (4 children)

In my experience, they might not clean their own vehicles. They get people serving community service hours for petty crimes to do it for them.

Or so I'm told.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 13 points 4 days ago

This is also the state were they legalized running over protesters with your car, so maybe they just want this so that they can stop giving the cops PTSD.
This bad boy can do all the civilian striking on aidewalks for you and you dont even have to borher fixing the autonomous part.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago

So if it runs over a pedestrian who gets the vacation?

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago

So you can send the car in and it will deploy a drone eh

How about you just deploy a drone

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 31 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (6 children)

Seems more like a marketing stunt. Emphasis by me:

The PUG will eventually be allowed to drive the streets of Miami-Dade unmanned after a healthy amount of community feedback, the sheriff said. But a deputy will be in the front seat as the vehicle drives itself — for at least the first year.

Source

I think I've spotted a Ford logo on the car. And to my knowledge they're nowhere near autonomous driving as of today?! Wikipedia says they're at SAE level 2, while something in the general direction of autonomy would be level 4 or 5, with the added complexity that they'd need special software and AI training for emergency situations. Which probably doesn't exist either. So I seriously doubt it'll be able to do any proper police work in a year. It might be able to autonomously grab a box of donuts from their favorite store by then. And I suppose that could make their day better. But more than that is going to prove difficult... And the drone might be useful, as far as I know drones can really help with police and fire and rescue tasks.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 10 points 5 days ago

It is a (not really) autonomous vehicle that serves as a launchpad for a drone, which is the thing that does the reconnaissance.

Like they could just put drones on regular vehicles, but they want to pretend it is something more than that.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Queue the scene in V For Vendetta with cars monitoring everyone's phone calls as it drives around.

Except this fucker can deploy a drone that flies right up to your window and records you

[–] CovfefeKills@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That was real life not a movie thing. Literally without exaggeration. At the time that movie was made the famous tech for that was called The Stingray.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

We still call them Stingrays.

[–] CovfefeKills@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

That is a brand name like kleenex,we have many more products to be scared of <3

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's just disgusting they have the money for this.

[–] dwemthy@lemmy.world 23 points 5 days ago

Video said it was donated by the company that made it, not that that's better. Next step autonomous officers donated by Totally Not Killbots LLC

[–] chetradley@lemmy.world 23 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 7 points 5 days ago

Came here for this. Lemmy does not disappoint

[–] observes_depths@aussie.zone 11 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I hate cars and I hate AI. Guess what I think of this.

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 days ago (4 children)

You want to buy it a drink?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] ErrorCode@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

I was looking for the ED-209 comment! I wonder if that is going to be the license plate?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 16 points 5 days ago

It’s programmed to run over ethnics and then start yelling “HE’S GOT A GUN!” through the speaker while rolling back and forward.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

As a Miamian, yes Fucking Miami.

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

"For us, it's a way we can touch our community like we never have before"

... By deploying driverless cruisers?

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

Coming soon to all states in America! Corporate sponsored police robots.

[–] dan69@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Interesting, how does insurance work if the PUG vehicle hits a non/motorist.. so then no one is to blame then??

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 16 points 5 days ago

The cruiser gets suspended on full pay pending an internal investigation.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 5 points 5 days ago

Taxpayers pay everything

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Soktopraegaeawayok@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Oh. No... nononono... this shit ain't right. That bullshit ain't gonna fly for long... AI controlled police cruisers??? Fuck that! Im not anything like an activist/protester but id set fire to one of those.

[–] Digestive_Biscuit@feddit.uk 4 points 4 days ago

There's probably a load of expensive stuff there waiting to be stolen.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

It's Florida. They suck Cop's dicks and ❤️ Trump.

It'll be Robocop there before you know it.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 11 points 5 days ago

Real life example of being blinded by "can we" instead of "should we". This society needs a great deal of introspection.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

Finally, hiding in shrubbery will be a thing of the past for the criminal underbrush.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 7 points 5 days ago

@PugJesus can claim to be their messiah and stop them being evil!

load more comments
view more: next ›