this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2025
169 points (100.0% liked)

News

32744 readers
3967 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Republican Speaker Mike Johnson predicted Monday the federal government shutdown may become the longest in history, saying he “won’t negotiate” with Democrats until they hit pause on their health care demands and reopen.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20251014124743/https://news.lee.net/johnson-says-he-won-t-negotiate/article_d534eec1-4252-4eb4-a9c1-8e78926d117e.html

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SereneSadie@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 23 minutes ago* (last edited 23 minutes ago)

We dont negotiate with terrorists, Mikey.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 10 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Ok.

Don't.

Your party is in control. Don't negotiate and watch what happens to your head when enough Americans get real desperate.

Even poor people can build guillotines.

[–] Soulg@ani.social 1 points 54 minutes ago

I'm curious how effective the mass propaganda on every website and in all the airports etc are going to be. People are stupid and they're going to hear that narrative over and over and we all know the Democrats aren't going to effectively counter it

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The administration has 3 legal options:

  1. Compromise with dems on not making working class Americans already shitty and expensive healthcare worse
  2. Get rid of corruption and obstruction by removing the filibuster and force a vote
  3. Shut down the government

Republicans will choose #3 10/10 because they can't actually make the government work via compromise it would undermine all their fascist rhetoric, and they won't let go of their obstructionist tools they and dems use to fuck over the working class.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Personally I'm banking on them refusing to negotiate long enough that Americans get desperate enough to drag them into the streets and finally treat them the way fascists should be treated.

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 hours ago

He won't negotiate until the other side gives up all their leverage, despite a history of them not negotiating and just demanding things.

Yup, sounds right.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 23 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Keep it closed. The government hasbeen crumbling for 40 years now. The parts that actually helped Americans want fair nor transformative in a grand scheme, by design. America just isn't hungry enough for change. Keep it closed. Every Nation is just three missed meals away from revolution, and considering the largest employer isn't paying it's workers it'll be about another 60 days before we're hungry enough.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Yup.

We're in an abusive relationship with our federal government. Keep it shut down until Americans revolt and deal with the fascists. Then we can reorganize it and try again.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 43 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Well, if he won't negotiate, why does he expect the democrats to rubberstamp it?

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 33 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Because that is historically what they have done. Republicans know that can take advantage of Democrats “weakness” of being able to compromise. The illegal firing of furloughed workers is metaphorically the Republican terrorists executing hostages until their demands are met. They don’t care about the damage they are doing, but they know their opponents do. They have also historically used the tactic successfully.

They expect it has worked in the past. They will keep executing their hostages and they will keep blaming their own willful destruction on those who won’t just give them everything they want. What they are too stupid to realize is that many of their hostages are their own people, and the only thing that makes a rightist reconsider their sick ideology is when it comes back to bite them personally.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 12 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

He thinks they can force their hand by saying it's the Democrats that are preventing the military from getting paid.

So, basically, if Mike Johnson was your dad and (he spent all day after tracking your internet habits) you were abducted, you'd be a goner and he would go around blaming the abductors for refusing to release you for free.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

That aside is so distracting, but most excellent.

[–] Contramuffin@lemmy.world 14 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Because party Democrats are fucking cowards who fold the moment they face a moment of resistance. If I were the Republican party, I would have considered it to be a safe gambit.

It's good that the Democrats are refusing to give in now, but they really could have started doing that up to a year ago.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 6 points 6 hours ago

Yeah, Chuck Schumer basically gave the Republicans everything they wanted earlier this year on the first CR. He'll be willing to cave again once he gets fed up with all the calls from his corporate donors

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 29 points 8 hours ago (9 children)

As a Canadian who has almost limitless free access to healthcare, I've never understood America's decision to withhold the same from millions of people.

Instead the US spends $1 trillion on war machines.

Make it make sense.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 hour ago

Because the hierarchy of society that most politicians support demands employees who are terrified of leaving their exploitative jobs. Money is a powerful motivator, but even more powerful is the health of you and your family.

And at the same time, a very sick citizen does not generate economic benefits to them, so there's no reason to make serious care available and/or not crushingly expensive. Better to drain as much as possible from them before the dead weight succumbs to those pressures than direct any revenue that could given back to "job creators" as tax breaks of subsidies.

It's also why political and media personalities will brag about how quickly the county recovered from COVID. It wasn't an economic miracle, it was sacrificing lives at the altar of capitalism. It went hand in hand with our absurdly disproportionate number of deaths.

Why we don't storm their houses and string them up from lamp posts (or, I suppose, vote them out), I don't know.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Make it make sense.

Propaganda + Human Stupidity

We aren't as evolved as people would like to think.

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 hours ago

It doesn't make sense but as long as they are given another person to look down on the Americans seem happy.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Because the American theocracy is built around their most holy of books, “Atlas Shrugged.” Greed and selfishness are noble pursuits, and whoever is hurt by them deserves it because they weren’t strong enough to fight back and win.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, yes but also extremely no. Rand's influence ends about three feet away from those books. The Chicago School of Economics, The Cato Institute, and The Heritage Foundation are the real powerhouses here.

That, plus good ol' racism and the oil crisis of the 70s are why we missed the bus on robust social safety nets. (Boomers were making actual societal change, but then the oil crisis turned a majority of them into conservatives)

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

The oil crisis will go down in history as the beginning of the end, where the story of the Late American Republic starts.

All that is left to decide is what chapter follows

[–] blattrules@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

It doesn’t make any sense, it’s so fucking stupid. I can’t stand paying a middleman every month who is not a doctor and can just deny me coverage that I need if I go to the wrong hospital or if they don’t agree with something my doctor recommended. All because a significant portion of the populace is too fucking stupid to understand how this is an extremely inefficient system at best and they reduce any argument in favor of changing it to “communism!” which is a word they heard is bad generations ago and never bothered spending two seconds to look up the actual definition ever since.

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

They'll also just say "muh waiting lists" like that's somehow a worse problem than not getting care at all

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

It doesn’t make any sense

a significant portion of the populace is too fucking stupid to understand

You just answered your own question. Welcome to America. It isn't getting smarter anytime soon.

[–] BarbedDentalFloss@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

We pay more for healthcare than you do, per capita. It's not that we don't have free healthcare - it's A) that the oligarchs have figured out how to build a money siphoning machine out of our healthcare system and B) that they can use it to enforce social classes.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 5 points 6 hours ago

Also, we pay more tax money per patient than any other country in the world on top of our monthly premiums, deductibles, and co-pays.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Triumph@fedia.io 47 points 9 hours ago

"I won't negotiate with you until you give up on all of the things you want."

This translates to "I won't negotiate with you." Because the "until" phrase would be the elimination of anything to be negotiated.

They're just insolent children stamping their feet.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 106 points 11 hours ago

Republicans didn't negotiate before passing the bill either, which is why we are where we are.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 21 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Translation: Mike Johnson doesn't care if you have healthcare or not, Americans. And he's willing to deprive millions of their paychecks to prove it.

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Let him try. The soldiers know who's withholding their pay, and you never not pay your soldiers. Should honestly be rule 1 of history, even before don't print money to pay for debt and don't invade Russia in winter

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 60 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

I can't help but feel like this would already be over if Democrats were better at messaging. The Republicans are so obviously on the wrong side of this, but every time Schumer opens his mouth poll numbers come out instead of rising insurance premiums.

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 5 points 6 hours ago

Have you met the Baileys? The imaginary (conservative) voters that Schumer bases all his policy decisions on? Watch this clip from Last Week Tonight and get a whole new understanding of his incompetence.

The Baileys: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 19 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Media isn't owned by people sympathetic to Democratic talking points.

Doesn't matter what your message is if no one plays it.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The Democrats aren't even sympathetic to Democratic talking points. Why would the media be?

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Well, the democrats do use the democratic talking points whether the politicians actually believe in them or are more beholden to their rich donors. But the real problem is the media who spin everything against the democrats. As a result, people (like you) are subconsciously programmed to hate on the democrats regardless of what they say.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

But the real problem is the media who spin everything against the democrats.

Citation needed on that one. The media is owned by the same people who own the politicians.

As a result, people (like you) are subconsciously programmed to hate on the democrats regardless of what they say.

No the problem is that Democrats are all talk and no action and people like yourself are subconsciously programmed to always invent or repeat excuses for why that is. You think that Democrats are the good guys just by virtue of Republicans being the bad guys. Unfortunately, we don't live in a Marvel movie with clearly defined heroes and villains battling it out. In the real world, they can all be villians. Some just dress their villainy in flowery language.

[–] bloup@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It’s not because they’re incompetent. It’s because they don’t give a shit about you or any of us and they don’t see themselves as part of the group of people that have to experience the consequences.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 19 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

Both. It’s both of those things.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aramis87@fedia.io 40 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Seems to me that back in the spring, they said open the government and we'll talk, and then they didn't talk. Fool me once ...

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 19 points 9 hours ago (3 children)
[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 hours ago

Chuck Schumer "well maybe it'll work out this time. Let's take them at their word."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 70 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Of course, the dems always need to reach across the aisle, but it doesn't apply to the gop lol

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 16 points 10 hours ago

all they are asking is for a clean bill so that they have more time. you know. like what the dems gave them in spring. /s I mean its true so not exactly /s but the /s is for anyone who does not really understand the background but /s in that yes im making fun of the republicans and their absolute rediculous demands. They expect that they can do nothing and that the other side should bend over backwards to fix the problems they make.

[–] Sibshops@lemmy.myserv.one 55 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I'm glad the Democratic lawmakers are not pulling a Fetterman. If the Democratic lawmakers always vote Republican, why even vote for them in the first place?

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

That's what leftists have been trying to explain to liberals for the past 8 years. All the Democrats in Ohio were running on platforms of securing the border and keeping trans kids out of schools while being dead silent on Republican corruption in the state, Republican attempts to undermine cannabis and abortion referendums that the overwhelming majority of us voted for 2 years ago. Why would anyone vote for them if the best they can offer is watered down Republican plans?

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Because it’s better than the non watered down plans?

Like obviously primary for a good candidate but in a 2 party system where you either have to eat a 5lb bag of shit or a 1lb bag of shit I cannot understand the mindset that there is no point voting because both are the same

[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

I voted, because I'm aware that not voting is a fast track for eating a 5 lb bag of shit.

However, what would you say if in the next election, it was a choice between a 2 lb bag of shit and a 7 lb bag of shit? Then the next was the choice between a 5 lb bag of shit and a 10 lb bag of shit? When do you decide that you just don't want to eat shit anymore?

It's almost like that was part of the right's strategy the whole fucking time.

[–] BarbedDentalFloss@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

He won't negotiate because this isn't a normal government shutdown over budgetary issues. This is the end of the federal government. This is how it dies. It literally just runs out of money while terrorizing people so that even the most liberal libs learn to hate the federal government and accept the new dictatorship of their redstate masters.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 15 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Or they run out of money to keep paying their secret police to keep terrorizing people, and even they turn on them.

If anything, it seems like people are finally starting to understand why it's important to have a federal government (even if it's an imperfect one) and to have some federal protections (even if they were never full proof). Maybe if we make it through this we can fix what was broken, or at least improve it.

I was listening to an episode of It can happen here about the federalization of Chicago. The guest kept talking about how this felt different than any other time bc of the lawlessness and lack of accountability, especially since the people breaking the law are allowed to conceal their identity.

I can't help but feel a bit frustrated people didn't realize this was always going to be the reality of losing federal oversight. All of America is now at risk of turning into the little towns that the federal government had to be deployed to after the civil rights act. Except, the federal government has been taken over by the oligarchs that used to only control small towns and territories.

I wish America would remember our history, and understand this isn't the first time we have faced this bullshit. If we can stick together and remember what American values were supposed to be (liberty and justice for all), there's a chance we can make it.

It's a new battle requiring new strategies, but it's the same bullshit as always. Lawless gangs crushing dissent and ignoring civil rights while keeping their identity concealed? It's all so fucking on the nose sometimes.

In 1865, at the conclusion of the Civil War, six Confederate veterans gathered in Pulaski, Tennessee, to create the Ku Klux Klan, a vigilante group mobilizing a campaign of violence and terror against the African American people that benefited from the progress of Reconstruction. As the group gained members from all strata of Southern white society, it used violent intimidation to prevent Black Americans — and any white people who supported Reconstruction — from voting and holding political office.

In 2024, the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) underwent notable reconfigurations among its ranks. Two of the larger factions — the Old Glory Knights and the Loyal White Knights — either faded from relevance or ceased operations altogether. In the wake of these dissolutions, newer groups, such as the Maryland White Knights and the Sacred White Knights, emerged, gaining traction from members of the defunct chapters. This year has also seen an increase in collaborative efforts between Klan groups and other white supremacist organizations. The United Klan Nation notably co-hosted events with the Aryan Freedom Network, while antisemitic Christian Identity and Klan-affiliated networks, including the Church of the Keystone Knights and Kingdom Identity Ministries, overlapped through shared leadership.

load more comments
view more: next ›