this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2025
342 points (100.0% liked)

History Memes

872 readers
945 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism (including tankies/red fash), atrocity denial or apologia, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Piefed.social rules.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Agreed, but with the way gummint tends to hold onto things past their usefulness date, we would probably still have the same ones. I'm pretty sure modern solar panels are much more efficient. So we either install new ones when a more intelligent person is President, or we paint 'em gold and slap 'em on the top and sides of the new ballroom. Easy to convince His Orangeitude they were his idea.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Right now, there are none though. And significantly fewer plants too.

[–] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Plenty of Russian Plants in the Whitehouse.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago

and plus the other russian mouthpiece"the left left me abandoned" tulsi gabbard.

[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They were water heating panels, not pv.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

That's what I vaguely remembered but it's been a few regimes and I'm old. As would they be if still in place.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 18 points 2 days ago

we would probably still have the same ones. I’m pretty sure modern solar panels are much more efficient.

Hardly the point. Even if you blanketed the white house grounds with panels, it's not putting a dent in overall power usage for the area.

It is, however, a very visible signal, "we value renewables, science, and intelligence" that shows progress away from the old world, and that scares a lot of old white people.

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 8 points 2 days ago

when a more intelligent person is President,

I envy your stable mental state

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Trump removing the rose garden, twice.

[–] Xerxos@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

Ah yes, Regan: fucking up everything he could.

Many problems today come from his time as president, and many Republicans hail him as the best president (except for the orange traitor, of course).

Sometimes I wonder if the Republican politicians are 100% made up of psychopaths...

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Oh yeah, I vaguely remember that one. I guess Reagan was only better than Trump because most of the government was still kinda OK when he started fucking it up.

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, and You know how Reagan's policies are still fucking shit up 40 years later? How long will Trump's fuckups be felt. The next 4 or 5 generations are already fucked.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago

I wouldn't be opposed to the Dems winning the next election but yeah, it wouldn't change much. Something more fundamental is required.

[–] superniceperson@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well good news. That won't be happening. Once you go bad enough and people lose confidence in the farce that is government, a new one must be made.

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

True. I'm no history buff, but I think it usually requires things to first get even worse, like a war or a revolution, before it gets better.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 5 points 2 days ago

Reagan was the devil, but since he was an actor he could pretend to be the nation's loving grandpa.

Acting!