202

Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) said Thursday he is "thinking seriously" about dropping his affiliation with the Democratic Party and becoming an independent.

Why it matters: Manchin has made a career out of proclaiming his independence from D.C. Democrats. But his latest comments have added significance, given his public flirtation with a possible third party presidential bid in 2024.

What he's saying: "I'm thinking seriously," Manchin told West Virginia radio host Hoppy Kercheval, adding, "I have to have peace of mind, basically. The brand has become so bad. The D brand and R brand ... You've heard me say a million times, I am not a Washington Democrat."

  • Pressed on how seriously he is approaching the idea, Manchin said he has "been thinking about that for quite some time" and wants to "make sure that my voice is truly an independent voice."
  • Manchin said he hasn't "made any decisions," telling Kercheval, "When I get ready to make a decision, I'll come see you."

The backdrop: Manchin has been dropping hints for months that he may follow the lead of Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (I-Ariz.), who announced her switch to independent in December but still caucuses with Democrats.

  • Asked about becoming an independent later that month during a CBS News interview, Manchin said, "I'll let you know later what I decide to do, but right now I have no intention of changing anything."
  • There were rumors as far back as 2021 that Manchin may bolt the party – though he dismissed them then as "bull****."

What we're watching: Manchin faces an uphill reelection battle in a state that voted for former President Trump by nearly 40 percentage points in 2020. The frontrunner in the GOP primary for his seat is popular Gov. Jim Justice.

  • Manchin has spent the last year distancing himself from President Biden and fellow Democrats, repudiating parts of the Inflation Reduction Act and even threatening to oppose Biden's Environmental Protection Agency nominees.
  • He may also decide to go another way. He headlined a New Hampshire town hall last month hosted by No Labels, a centrist group that is laying the groundwork for a potential third party presidential ticket.
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 116 points 1 year ago

I mean... he isn't a Democrat, so...

[-] negativenull@lemmy.world 77 points 1 year ago

He's following Kyrsten Sinema into irrelevance.

[-] BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 year ago

*all the way to the bank

FTFY

load more comments (24 replies)
[-] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago

Framing No Limits as a “centrist group” would be hilarious if they weren’t such a danger to America. No Limits exists to be a spoiler candidate to get Trump elected. After all, Harlan Crow—Clarence Thomas’ billionaire BFF and massive Republican donor—is a major contributor to No Limits.

Also, Joe Manchin can suck an egg.

[-] galaxies_collide@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

He can suck something much harder than an egg.

[-] keeb420@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

Progressives were right about him. Any centrist Democrat who spent any time at all pretending his shit didn't stink: don't you dare start speaking ill about him now. He's exactly the same piece of shit you knowingly defended for years because he was killing progressive legislation for you.

Face, meet leopard. Leopard, face.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] galaxies_collide@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

He’s not a democrat, so he should quit lying.

[-] negativenull@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

As much as I hate the guy and his blantant dishonesty (especially about political affiliation)

The guy happens to be threatening control of the house. Though it sounds like he’s fishing for bribes or something from the pubies.

[-] uphillbothways@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

*control of the senate

small correction. agree wholeheartedly otherwise.

[-] zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Since he'd become an independent who caucuses with the democrats, it wouldn't change the balance of power in the senate even if there were still a 50/50 split. Sanders, Angus King, and Sinema are already independents who causus with the democrats.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 34 points 1 year ago

No one has seriously considered Manchin to be a Dem for a while, so, good for him to get with the times

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

Leave already. Quit taking democratic fundraising money if you aren’t a Dem.

[-] TwoGems@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

He loves yummmy dark GOP money

[-] LostMyRedditLogin@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Hopefully Synema loses her reelection and all these idiots leaving the Democratic Party learn a real hard lesson.

[-] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Her move to leave was blatant self interest. Polls showed she was going to lose a primary in a landslide. She has no chance in hell of winning re-election. She's just hoping to be a spoiler at this point.

I don’t think I’ve seen anything that predicts she has a chance in hell. I’m betting she moves on to guest host on Fox.

[-] FReddit@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, they need a new liar now that fucker Carlson is gone.

[-] AncientFutureNow@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

He's been voting republican for years. Wolf in sheeps clothing. Fuck the GOP. Fuck Manchin

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sanity_in_Moderation@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

The amount of people that don't understand that Manchin prevented Mitch McConnell from being the speaker of the Senate is disappointing.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Actually, I think this is the only reason he hasn't been hung by his testicles by the rest of the Democrat party. It is literally the one and only purpose he serves, as he's been a massive roadblock to virtually all other meaningful legislation.

And what people understand is we still need him for that purpose.

Right now, the Senate is a 51/49 split. If Diane Feinstein kicks the bucket, Manchin and Sinema would literally decide who the Senate Majority leader is. Piss off Manchin and he votes for McConnell, and would you really trust Sinema not to flip votes in exchange for political favors?

Manchin may be almost singlehandedly stopping the Democrat agenda, but it's at least better (Read: slightly less shitty) than stopping the Democrat agenda and installing McConnell as majority leader and sending us backwards.

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 19 points 1 year ago

Yeah, well, fuck him now and later.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

please leave. we know how you vote already

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

He said wants something in return for not leaving.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Knowing his history and knowing Democrats, he'll get it and then leave anyway.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Let me know when he seriously considers leaving our planet.

[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

Bernie Sanders has also "left the Democratic party", he's an independent who caucuses with Democrats.

If that's what Manchin is considering, it probably makes him more electable in WV. If he's voting with Democrats on most things like he is now, that sounds like a good thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MacGuffin94@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Personally I don't like him but I would not be surprised if this was a move more because he views a D next to his name on the ballot as a bigger liability than an I. He's not a good let alone great asset but the reality is that he is head am shoulders better than whatever lunatic WV would elect from the GOP. The most important thing to have our of WV is someone Ds can work with and you know you aren't getting that from a R but you can work with Manchin.

I think the Dems are better off cutting him loose and spending the election money in a purple state on a seat they can flip. Tell Manchin to get bent and spend those resources on something that will get you votes in the senate, not drama and extortion.

Besides, whether D or I, he’s going to lose the election. Backing him is just throwing good money after bad. Pull his committee memberships and let him keep a seat warm until he’s voted out.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] blazera@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

Hes makin the joe lieberman circuit. I think Chris Coons is next in line to be the democrats scapegoat for not getting anything done.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CoolSouthpaw@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Ugh. Just get the fuck out already. He's such a motherfucking piece of shit.

[-] dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago

He would have to be incredibly stupid to do so. The only reason he has so much influence is because he's the furthest right Democrat. The second he's no longer a dem, he's just another replaceable right-wing shit head.

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Why he hasn’t been kicked out for blocking the alleged dem agenda every step of the way is a bit of a puzzle…until you put the pieces together to realize he’s expertly doing his job.

[-] Decimit@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because he somehow wins in a location that they believe would vote republican otherwise. He is being held onto just for the needed numbers. If we didn’t keep having such close numbers in congress he would have been primaried a long time ago.

*Fixed typos

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] wwaxwork@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I thought he'd left already, or was that only in spirit?

[-] FReddit@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Just go.l, Manchin. Your hatred of all that's good makes you a Republikklan.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
202 points (95.1% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3801 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS