When somebody laughes at your Facebook post, but you were being serious : memes

[-] Windex007@lemmy.world 36 points 11 months ago

[-] GardenVarietyAnxiety@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

[-] lugal@lemmy.ml 30 points 11 months ago

🤣

[-] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 25 points 11 months ago

[-] MrWafflesNBacon@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

[-] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I mean...

[-] pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 11 months ago

anything ruining Facebook, i approve of

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 9 points 11 months ago

Just cancel Facebook all-together

[-] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 6 points 11 months ago

When you google “First World Problems” this article should be the first result.

[-] BananaPeal@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I fully endorse this headline. Unrelated: I stop reading at apostrophes.

Edit: In this case, I meant the second apostrophe. Fail.

[-] bratosch@lemm.ee 16 points 11 months ago

No laughing matter: Why it

[-] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 11 months ago

No laughing matter: why it"

I also endorse this headline

[-] rimjob_rainer@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Post dumb Facebook post

Get laughed at

Write angry blog post why others are wrong and I am right

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 1 points 10 months ago

Write angry blog post about why criticizing people should be impossible

FTFY

[-] dipshit@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

eh? heh hee hee!

[+] vexikron@lemmy.zip -13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That emoji captures how I feel toward anyone who still has a Facebook account.

Facebook got its angel investment from a front company for the NSA, and the NSA cancelled a project to figure out how to do mass domestic surveillance literally 24 hours prior.

[-] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago

Yeah ima go ahead and slap a

[citation needed]

all over that until a cite is provided

[-] Wogi@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

His citation is just a picture of Obi-Wan Kenobi saying of course he's got a source.

[-] vexikron@lemmy.zip -4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Apologies, it was DARPA program, and the funding came from the CIA, to Peter Thiel, to Facebook. Got my alphabet soup a bit mixed up.

https://unlimitedhangout.com/2021/04/investigative-reports/the-military-origins-of-facebook/

I assumed this story was common knowledge?

Guess not.

Anyway yeah, when part of your job includes managing cybersecurity policies for a medium sized organization, its behooves oneself to do some research into the most well known data thieves in the world, the US Government.

[-] Wogi@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

What brand of foil do you use for your hats? I find Reynolds to be too expensive but anything else I just don't feel like does a good job blocking the beta waves

[-] kelseybcool@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

What big brother doesn't want you to know:

Any brand as long as it has nonstick coating.

[-] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Ms. Krabaple, I ate my foil...

[-] 6mementomori@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I prefer my tinfoil hats in cast iron

[-] vexikron@lemmy.zip -2 points 11 months ago

I only use the tinfoil in my wallet.

I remember everyone calling me crazy in the early 2010's for pointing out that the new smart chips in credit cards could be read by various electronic devices, and that this could be blocked by basically lining your wallet with tinfoil.

Nowadays of course you can just buy wallets with it neatly built in.

You can also line a backpack or laptop bag with tinfoil on the inside to do shoplifting, as long as they have the older style scanning towers.

[-] JustAManOnAToilet@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

https://www.csoonline.com/article/561891/why-you-dont-need-an-rfid-blocking-wallet.html

RFID-related crime isn’t only very unlikely, it’s non-existent.

[-] vexikron@lemmy.zip 0 points 11 months ago

So a crime perpetrated by highly technically competent attackers, that can be done and hidden easily by such highly competent attackers, has never been proved to have happened, even though this very article outlines that it is very doable...

Do you think this means I am somehow incorrect in stating that this is a thing that can happen? An article that explains that it can happen?

Or do you think it 'proves' that it doesnt make sense to worry about, or take steps to mitigate?

I got the RFID mitigating wallet I have for 10 dollars. Its a great wallet, easily worth 10 dollars whether or not it has RFID protection.

[-] JustAManOnAToilet@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

It's a non-existent crime. You do you, man.

[-] vexikron@lemmy.zip 0 points 11 months ago

I mean, I know how to do it and get away with it, but I dont because I am a decent person.

[-] JustAManOnAToilet@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I'm sure you do, bud.

[-] xodoh74984@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Source please

[-] doctorn@r.nf 2 points 11 months ago

It's from a parody news website:

-The actual article-

So sadly not real, but I still thought it represented Facebook-folk quite well. 😅

memes

Community rules

Sister communities