901
Should be backpay and a half at least to make it an actual deterrent, but whatever
Back pay, interest. And a whopping fine.
Republicans are blocking the bill that would allow the NLRB to issue fines for ULPs.
And of course they are...
Not to mention, re-hiring is kinda bullshit. Who's going to want to feel comfortable working at an employer that fucked them over once already?
I'm sure she's going to have an excellent working environment and management that really appreciates her.
Yeah, but good on her for fighting back.
I’ve been in a similar position, and can attest to it being something that takes a toll on your energy, mood, and health. The fact that she went to court and is going back is impressive as fuck.
Some times being the martyr is genuinely useful. She made an achievement, and she isn't obligated to stay afterwards. She could have just moved on without fighting for justice.
She only has to work one day to get her backpay
We need more unions.
I wish the programming industry would unionize, but it's just not something I see happening any time soon if ever.
Tech people love to think they don't need unions. Unfortunately.
IT in general is the biggest industry that has risen to its level of prominence since the heyday of unions. We’ve all been conditioned to be in conflict/competition with our fellow IT workers and also that we’re easily replaceable. Couple that with it being a fairly safe in comparison to mining or factory work and you have the recipe for not unionizing. Ironically only the medical industry would bring the country to a halt with a strike faster than if every support tech, analyst, designer, and engineer walked off the job tomorrow
I understand if Medical Industry just strikes could grind the country to a halt. But for a statement with IT not causing huge issue on day one if everyone in IT industry just strike. Good chance it will affect not just the medical but also everything else. I think we're underestimating how integrated IT is in our society. Some of those 99.9% uptime servers are basically just 50/50 a day and can just breakdown suddenly for little to no reason at all and someone not in the helm or on call could become a nightmare situation.
Not all of them, I'd love to have a union but it's just not likely to happen.
Props to her and all the people fighting for better things. Unions have made some great gains last year.
Starbucks is evil coffee for evil people
Not even good evil coffee!!!
If you're going to have evil coffee, it should at least be good
The e person in the article is extra evil for getting their job back!
What about punitive payments to cover mental health, legal and financial costs related to the firing?
This is the type of person I admire.
Hope she sticks it to them and the rest of her colleagues come to her defence.
Yeah, she's a cool cookie
Why couldn't Starbucks just ignore the just ignore the judge like they ignored the law?
Video says they may appeal, which is the next best thing
Then they send in Judge Dredd because he is the law
By coincidence, I'm wearing a tshirt supporting Starbucks unionization from last night. It's the rainbow one.
shit coffee suffocating small coffee shops doing infinitely better work
Sounds like a case where they'll shut down the entire location and move across the street.
this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2024
901 points (98.6% liked)
News
23361 readers
3207 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS