It is understood they were found not as a direct result of the search operation for 35-year-old Ezedi.
A sentence with the clarity of the sediment in which they were found. Good old Grauniad.
The more letters you use the more things you can hide in the space between them
It feels like there should be a but and a few more words at the end but the sub-editor had a hack at it.
So this news story should have actually been police find two bodies in the river.
If it's got nothing to do with them looking for this Ezedi person then I don't understand why they're linking it.
Ezedi came to the UK hidden in a lorry in 2016 and was turned down twice for asylum before successfully appealing against the Home Office rejection by claiming he had converted to Christianity.
Not from the UK and setting aside everything else about this guy, WTF is this?? You can't be accepted into the country unless your Christian?? Wut.
It's been the bit of the coverage that keeps making me go "wait, what?". Conversion to Christianity isn't a requirement but it does seem be a factor that can be considered. This is a less sensational overview than some doing the rounds and they point out that some people "convert" because they couldn't be a Christian in their home country (like Afghanistan, where the Taliban might not look kindly on it). A claim for asylum partly based on escaping religious persecution might be viewed more favourably.
That's not quite what is happening here. His original application for asylum was turned down on the grounds that it was found he would be reasonaby safe from persecution in his origin country. However, being Christian would have substantially added to is risk of return and he was therefore subsequently granted asylum.
On top of other reasons you've had, I was listening to the radio yesterday and apparently there's Christian groups giving free help to asylum seekers if they convert. Free legal help probably being the most useful.
They need the help obviously but it feels quite predatory to put conditions on it.
You need to understand that Jesus' love is completely conditional on believing in Him (sic). And if you're aware of Jesus and His (sic) Father (sic?) "which art in heaven" (sic, at least in some texts), anything you then do that is not for Them (sic?) is deserving of punishment.
Christianity is a loving religion (sic).
Makes me sic.
My Christian has nothing to do with it.
God and Queen!
I have questions...
The diversity of death cults
The Torso in the Thames for one.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Two male bodies have been recovered from the River Thames as police search for a suspect who severely injured a “vulnerable” woman and her two young daughters in a chemical assault.
Neither body was identified as that of Abdul Ezedi, who has been on the run since the attack on 31 January in Clapham, south London.
The bodies of two men were pulled from the river on Saturday, and both deaths are being treated by police as “unexpected pending further inquiries”.
The woman remains in a “critical but stable condition” in hospital, “very poorly and unable to speak”, police said.
Ezedi came to the UK hidden in a lorry in 2016 and was turned down twice for asylum before successfully appealing against the Home Office rejection by claiming he had converted to Christianity.
Speaking about the river search for Ezedi, Jon Savell, a commander at Scotland Yard, said: “At this time of year, the Thames is very fast flowing, very wide and full of lots of snags.
The original article contains 439 words, the summary contains 167 words. Saved 62%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.