-8
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by ashishlotake@mastodon.social to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

Why @firefox is not implementing this UI by default and why none of the Firefox-derived web browsers implementing this.

I somehow managed to build this, but its not prefect.

@librewolf

At this point the there has been almost no significant improvement.
How Mozilla Ruined Firefox --> https://youtu.be/ugnOM2mzgNU

Hoping @firefox wont forces me to move to brave.

#Linux #foss #privacy #firefox

EDIT:- New UI with Minimize Close Maximize button, giving space which can be used to drag.

all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MorphiusFaydal@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

I definitely prefer Firefox as it is now to that.

[-] miniu@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago

I'll note that not everyone has hundreds of tabs open ;) I prefer my tabs on the top as I never have more then 4 and even then I feel it's too many.

[-] nan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago

Yes please on integrated vertical tabs and tab groups, and not the crappy sidebar.

[-] ashishlotake@mastodon.social 3 points 1 year ago

@nan
thank god, one like minded person, integrated vertical tabs and tab groups please

[-] gabriele97@lemmy.g97.top 1 points 1 year ago

Yep I don't understand why they have not been implemented yet

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

By the way, not sure if you did this intentionally, but through the magic of federation, you also posted this to the Firefox community on Lemmy: https://lemmy.ml/post/3562992

That's why some of the comments are interpreting this post a lot less like you're just expressing a personal opinion, but rather like you're saying this is the one and only truth...

[-] ashishlotake@mastodon.social 3 points 1 year ago

@Ephera I just want to share my thought, and definitely this is not the only solution, this worked for me doesn't mean it will for all.

I am just suggesting this to be one of the possible consideration.

[-] CommunityLinkFixer 4 points 1 year ago

Hi there! Your text contains links to other Lemmy communities, here are correct links for Lemmy users: !librewolf@lemmy.ml

[-] CloverSi@lemmy.comfysnug.space 2 points 1 year ago

Take a look at Floorp, it's a little rough around the edges but has vertical tabs plus a lot of other nice features. Feels a lot like Vivaldi but Firefox-based instead of Chromium-based.

[-] ashishlotake@mastodon.social 0 points 1 year ago
[-] CloverSi@lemmy.comfysnug.space 1 points 1 year ago

That's too bad, I just started using it a few days ago and I love it. Covers most of the customization I want to do to Firefox that's kind of a pain like vertical tabs, alternate themes, reopen last closed tab button, etc etc. Out of curiosity, what do you prefer about other browsers/forks? Floorp seems like it covers more of the changes you've made in the screenshot than any other I know of, is there another one with more customization options?

[-] ashishlotake@mastodon.social 0 points 1 year ago

@CloverSi to be honest, there is no significant improvement or difference between most of the firefox derivative and firefox iteself, they dont bring anything new/different to table other than implement uere.js by default.

which i can just copy past from github.

And the floorps has just copied all the css files from https://github.com/MrOtherGuy/firefox-csshacks/ and implemented it in toggle, which anyone can reproduce and there was some flaws. something like "Arc Browser" or "SigmaOS browser" which are macos only

[-] CloverSi@lemmy.comfysnug.space 1 points 1 year ago

Your original post was asking why no Firefox forks implement that ui, but now you're saying there's no point when you can make those changes yourself...

[-] lightsecond@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

It doesn’t look half-bad but i would rather have roughly the same firefox interface on every OS than have it customized for gnome as it appears here.

[-] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I have set up something pretty similar to yours in windows, and people have actually complemented me on it when I share my screen. That being said, I think it would be a pretty intimidating interface for non-power users.

[-] ashishlotake@mastodon.social 0 points 1 year ago

@dantheclamman Yeah i totally forget about non-power user, I am happy with result and want to share.

[-] Radiant_sir_radiant@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure if I unterstand you correctly, but Vivaldi can be configured to have tabs on any side, and (sorta-nested) tab groups if you're so inclined. It's based on Chromium though.

[-] ashishlotake@mastodon.social 1 points 1 year ago

@Radiant_sir_radiant I tried it for a week, I like it but its not @firefox (does it make sense, definitely not)

To be honest its very hard to justify why @firefox "only" , cant see myself using anything other than firefox based and cant reason why this is case.

[-] Radiant_sir_radiant@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hey, "I'm happy with it" is as good a justification as any. 🙂

It does make it a challenge though. I don't know of any Firefox-based browser that does that. But then again, I'm by no means well-informed there. Maybe somebody will build one?

[-] Mio@feddit.nu 1 points 11 months ago

I dont think it should be default. Personally I think tabs on right click might even be smarter since I would not have to move the mouse so far. Yes, I don't horde tabs. I never understood how to handle tabs without the title. So I never have more than 10 tabs.

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/ugnOM2mzgNU

https://piped.video/ugnOM2mzgNU

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
-8 points (43.5% liked)

Firefox

17303 readers
246 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS