I was driving through, I think Utah, a while back and I remember seeing a billboard ad for a local bank. They were heavily leaning into religious marketing (or maybe they were a "Christian Bank") and I remember thinking "Y'all im pretty sure Jesus had major issues with using the lord's name for business" lmao
Well that's after the book was mistranslated through version after version.
Utah has an accurate translation that their prophet found by looking into his hat.
I honestly do try to live by WWJD. Its a pretty legit way of thinking.
But the problem is, trying to give a chance to everybody tends to earn a lot of "tsk tsk" from many Christians around here.
Q: WWJD?
A: (╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻
I always figured Jesus was trying to piss everyone off and martyr himself. He showed up to Roman controlled Jerusalem, during a pilgrimage month, got the local leaders riled up, has people worshipping him and calling him king, (don't call yourself a king in a Roman province unless you wanna see what Romans do to Kings), his followers are lopping off ears, and disturbing the pax Romana. Really didn't leave Roman authorities much choice but to please the locals by taking him out.
He's sorta a Rasputin like character. Running around with prostitutes, healing the sick, great party tricks, rather hard to kill.
You should probably read the book some time. People called him king but it wasn't a title he wanted or requested; the only title he used of himself was "Son of man". He didn't request anyone to lop ears off (and in fact repeately tried to drill into people that the way forward is love) and on the one occasion it's documented he rebuked the lopper and stuck the ear back on. It was the Pharisees and Sadducees that got riled up because Jesus exposed their hypocrisy, and the local leaders originally weren't interested because they just saw it as an internal religious matter, but the P&S knew what buttons to push and that's what got JC crucified. Pilate actually said he couldn't see what Jesus had done wrong.
That's the story told by his followers decades later. He would have been an apocalyptic peasant preacher, and most of those people have some combination of narcissism and mental instability. Most likely, he got killed for exactly what the sign on his crucifix said. Whitewashing his personality came later.
It's no good reason to kill someone. The Roman Empire was a brutal place. But he probably was guilty.
If I wanted credibility or accuracy I wouldn't read the Bible. In any case, he was a cheeky lad, knew how to get martyred but make it look political.
By the way, why were Jesus's disciples and followers carrying swords? Isn't that a contradiction?
More than one ear? :D
The issue today is Jesus was washed away in mainstream media as a rebel against Rome. They didn't want to sell that part of the story because, well, the Lord whipped and cursed them and they're still doing it.
Other random stuff that fits in with WWJD:
Not having edible fruit out of season
My problem with that story is that's the one time Jesus chose violence, vs the bajillion times he said to love your neighbor and turn the other cheek. But I've seen tons of posts by right wingers like "we should kill people we disagree with! Jesus was all about violence, did you hear about the time with the whip!?!?" using it as justification for their hate and totally ignoring all of Jesus's messages.
Jesus was about violence when people used the temple to turn a profit, similar to what 45 is doing by shilling his book.
What would dale do?
What would Joseph do
