254
submitted 7 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

They zip around the rink, armed with helmets, pads and mouthguards. They push, bump and occasionally crash out as they jostle for position on the hardwood floor. 

But for the women of the Long Island Roller Rebels, their biggest battle is taking place outside the suburban strip-mall roller rink where they’re girding for the upcoming roller derby season. 

The nearly 20-year-old amateur league is suing a county leader over an executive order meant to prevent women’s and girl’s leagues and teams with transgender players from using county-run parks and fields. The league’s legal effort, backed by the New York Civil Liberties Union, has thrust it into the national discussion over the rights of transgender athletes. 

Amanda Urena, the league’s vice president, said there was never any question the group would take a stand.

“The whole point of derby has been to be this thing where people feel welcome,” said the 32-year-old Long Island native, who competes as “Curly Fry” and identifies as queer, at a recent practice at United Skates of America in Seaford. “We want trans women to know that we want you to come play with us, and we’ll do our very best to keep fighting and making sure that this is a safe space for you to play.”

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 84 points 7 months ago

I disagree with excluding trans individuals from sports, but I can understand that there might be some leagues that disagree with me. So if a league or a private group wants to start discriminating based on some horseshit arguments about competitive advantage, I would simply boycot that league and move on with my day. I can't control what private groups want to do, and I can't force them to change eligibility requirements.

This isn't that.

an executive order meant to prevent women’s and girl’s leagues and teams with transgender players from using county-run parks and fields.

What the fuck is this? There isn't even a horseshit argument about competitive advantage here. Are they saying that trans women are going to have so much testosterone that they tear up the fields? It's just bigotry, and it's government sponsored bigotry. We can do something about that.

[-] whoreticulture@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago

This is where all the vitriol over trans women in sports leads. Roller derby is such a hugely queer sport, I'm so proud of them for taking a stand to defend their teammates.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

So if a league or a private group wants to start discriminating based on some horseshit arguments about competitive advantage, I would simply boycot that league and move on with my day.

I would agree to an extent. I don't know if I would be okay with a 'whites only' league existing.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

I wouldn't be OK with it, but I wouldn't have much to do about it. If it were government sponsored, I'd have a lot of things I'd be doing about it.

[-] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago

So you're okay with systemic racial discrimination, so long as it's not the government?

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I wouldn't be OK with it

[-] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 months ago

I can't control what private groups want to do, and I can't force them to change eligibility requirements.

Yes you can. We have many laws protecting groups from discrimination. That's why you can't legally discriminate against people by race/ethnicity, sex/gender, or disability.

It sounds to me like you don't respect the idea of LGBTQ+ people being part of a protected class.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

It sounds to me like you don't respect the idea of LGBTQ+ people being part of a protected class.

It sounds to me like you're going out of your way to selectively interpret what I said to create an argument.

I am not empowered to enforce the law, and I have no legal standing to sue for discrimination. I also can't stop thieves or murderers, but that doesn't mean I condone those crimes, either.

[-] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 months ago

Sorry, I assumed you lived in a democratic country and were stating that there was no way anyone could ever be obligated not to discriminate. Assuming you live somewhere where you have zero ability to influence change, your original post makes more sense, and doesn't read like a tacit endorsement of the current status quo against trans people.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

I accept your apology, and all is forgiven.

[-] Stern@lemmy.world 44 points 7 months ago

I would hope all sports there would make that stand but I knew 110% roller derby would.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 25 points 7 months ago

I'm not into sports, but I've known several women who have done roller derby and they are all very cool people.

Which is interesting for a kind of violent sport.

[-] mihnt@lemy.lol 11 points 7 months ago

I mean it can be a pretty good form of anger release.

[-] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 7 points 7 months ago

Catharsis is a hell of a drug.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

I could see that. People who box feel that way too.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 9 points 7 months ago

The woven I know who have done roller derby and rugby tend to all be chill af.

[-] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 31 points 7 months ago

Just a reminder that there's literally no reason to segregate sports by sex/gender when you can just create different classes like they do in some forms of wrestling.

The current state of competitive sports is hideously sexist.

[-] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

I agree completely. As a side-effect, you could wind up with men not built like refrigerators playing football alongside some women. To me, that just sounds civilized.

The trick is that weight classes by themselves are not enough. Pound-for-pound, men and women are generally different strength-wise. So there's still some kind of gendered grading curve involved here. But I think that's actually doable with the right science backing it up.

[-] MrMcGasion@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Also a reminder that many sports segregated by sex/gender were because the men got upset at being bested by women and changed the rules to protect their egos.

[-] HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Sorry to doubt you, but do you have a source for this? I can only find paywalled articles and the Wikipedia article doesn't have anything to back this up

[-] FakeGreekGirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 7 months ago

That's the main reason chess is segregated by gender, though I don't know if you'd call chess a sport.

[-] deus@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

I've heard that the reason chess (I'd call it a sport, yes) is segregated is the same reason why some e-sports are segregated, to try and promote the growth of the game among women.

[-] theherk@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

The open division isn’t separated, and there are not many women at the very top. Maybe none in the top hundred or more. That of course isn’t because of gender but more maybe due to under-representation. Nevertheless, the women’s division doesn’t exist because it outperforms the open division.

[-] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml -1 points 7 months ago

Here's an example of this happening from about a month ago.

https://www.comicsands.com/kentucky-girls-basketball-championship-ban-2667435991.html?

Tl;Dr: Girls basketball team plays in the boys league, makes it to the championship, and then they get disqualified because they don't want the boys to risk losing to girls.

And, as someone else has already mentioned, chess is gender segregated because men didn't want to compete against women in a game they actually have a fair chance at beating men at.

[-] HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Also I'm fairly sure in chess that there's open and women's leagues. I can't find anything mentioning a men's only league. I thought the women's league was mostly around to try to encourage women into a male dominated sport?

[-] HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

The above post makes it sound historical, and the only/main reason for women's leagues. I have no doubt in my mind there are select modern examples of salty boys being beaten by women's teams, but that's different from the origin of women's leagues being that men were salty about being beaten all the time

[-] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 7 months ago

can just create different classes like they do in some forms of wrestling.

Wrestling is divided into classes in addition to being segregated by sex and not in place of segregation by sex/gender

[-] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 months ago

Yeah, just ignore the part where I said "some forms of".

[-] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 7 months ago

My bad. My brain just skipped over it somehow.

[-] halfway_neko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 months ago

thank you for this great idea. i'm saving it into my brain rn

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Sent the old white dude an angry email. It is nice when the website lets you do that easily

https://www.nassaucountyny.gov/481/County-Executive

Guy looks like the offspring of Kris Kobach and Mike Pence.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

I work in government.

Zero of our elected officials use their official email addresses. I have to call their personal phones to find out if they're going to make a meeting.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Noted and thanks. I will use the fax number on the site.

this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2024
254 points (94.4% liked)

News

23259 readers
3367 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS