285
submitted 7 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 53 points 7 months ago

I see, so we're just believing that it's "faulty AI" rather than deliberate decisions? When it comes to war crimes, it's not the fault of the AI.

[-] Altofaltception@lemmy.world 32 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

You can't prosecute an AI. - Israel probably

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 39 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The original article had some really damning lines. Israel is beyond barbaric they try to bomb suspects inside of their family homes instead of trying to target active combatants

“We were not interested in killing [Hamas] operatives only when they were in a military building or engaged in a military activity,” A., an intelligence officer, told +972 and Local Call. “On the contrary, the IDF bombed them in homes without hesitation, as a first option. It’s much easier to bomb a family’s home. The system is built to look for them in these situations.”

Killing as many civilians as possible is modus operandi for israelis.

[-] Thrashy@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

There are so many things that were horrifying about the US's prosecution of the Global War on Terror, but at least when confronted with the same problem the US was like, "what if we invented a knife missile that can hit a guy in the driver's seat of a car without hurting anybody standing next to the car?" whereas the IDF took the position that a 100:1 ratio of innocent bystander to presumed militant is totally acceptable (in an environment where fully half of those innocent bystanders are children to boot). Just absolutely ghoulish levels of inhumanity.

load more comments (40 replies)
[-] xePBMg9@lemmynsfw.com 36 points 7 months ago

IDF: "Where is hamas?"

Chatgpt: "I don't have knowledge of specific events or developments that occurred after my knowledge cutoff date of January 2022."

IDF: "is it where the food trucks are?"

Chatgpt: "I don't have sufficient information."

IDF: "just say yes"

Chatgpt: "yes."

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

I feel really really bad about laughing at this

[-] superfes@lemmy.world 36 points 7 months ago

"Error prone" is a funny way to say "Working as designed"

[-] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 25 points 7 months ago

Sounds like the equivalent of US drone strikes.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

Yeah, but US drone strikes aren't so intense on one small area or group of people

[-] mwguy@infosec.pub 14 points 7 months ago

What do you mean? There's a whole generation of Yemeni children afraid of Sunny days because those are the days that people die. I'm a place that gets 300+ days of sunshine a year.

We we're much worse.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

It’s not a genocide. Not defending what we’ve done, but I don’t think it’s fair to compare to genocide

[-] mwguy@infosec.pub 11 points 7 months ago

I would fully disagree. We targeted civilians, not in war zones at functions like weddings, funerals and other explicitly civilian gatherings. We (the US) had the intent to kill civilians, and our tolerances for civilian casualties were an order of magnitude larger than what the IDF is using.

If anything it's not comparable because what we did was worse.

[-] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

Thank you for knowing history and at least trying to educate others from it. People here are so willing to bend definitions and ignore events that were far worse just so it can fit their narrative.

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It's 100% comparable. We're talking about collateral budgets for strikes. That's exactly what happened in both of these scenarios.

It just so happens they have different budgets, but they both had allowances for allowing innocent people to be killed alongside potential targets. On one hand it's plus one two three maybe even five allowable collateral on a target. On the other hand it's 100. But it's the same thing

It's either okay to kill civilians or it's not.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

All the starving people in Yemen would disagree with the not genocide comment. Like in Palestine, a religious nationalist is committing atrocities with full US support.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

Pretty sure that's a feature, not a bug. Evil fucks.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 8 points 7 months ago

Something that surprised me is the sheer size of a "family home" in Gaza.

We're not talking an apartment or even a house. We're talking a decent sized apartment building. Six floors or so. A hundred people.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-68400463

[-] AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago

If you still believe the "Hamas" bullshit, you literally don't have a brain

The crap Israel spins about Hamas is all a pile of horse shit so they can carry out their Manifest Destiny conquer of the middle east and purge the "holy land" and cleanse it from the "lesser people" and establish a rule of "god's chosen", that's literally what Zionists have believed for over ~70 years

Hamas is literally better than most of the governments and "freedom fighters" the united states finds itself in bed with

[-] ATDA@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Was this AI programmed by the fucking Israeli Peter Gibbons?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2024
285 points (95.5% liked)

World News

39019 readers
2184 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS