172
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] culprit@lemmy.ml 37 points 6 months ago

Pretty sure this is less than the US spent shooting down Iranian drones this weekend.

[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

What was that estimate again? Something on the order of 1.8 billion?

[-] astraeus@programming.dev 29 points 6 months ago

Hmmm maybe if the future of the nation’s infrastructure thought about limiting climate change instead of contributing to it…

[-] KnitWit@lemmy.world 25 points 6 months ago

..across 37 states, washington dc, and the virgin islands. Not even a Billion split between all of them.

[-] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Yeah this is basically pissing in the wind and calling it rain.

[-] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

These are just the latest grants in $50 billion already allocated so far, with more to come from both the infrastructure law and the inflation reduction act (which had the bulk of the climate change related funding). The $837 million is just the funding for these 80 newest projects that got funding on Thursday. The money from these giant laws don't all go out at once. It's made available, and then projects are submitted by state and local governments for funding. Everyone in this comment thread acting like $837 million is the only climate change funding is very mistaken and should probably start by reading the article, it's purpose is just to inform on these newest batch of projects that applied for and are now going to receive funding. I'm not saying don't allocate even more, but waaaay more than $837 million has been allocated so far and there's a lot more funding already passed waiting for projects still. It's not like specifically last Thursday was the only day ever that climate projects are being funded, just the latest batch.

[-] KnitWit@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Oh I definitely read it, and was also being snarky for sure. But even in the article it says that only 50 billion total gas been doled out. 50 billion split between more than fifty different states and territories over the course of two years still doesn’t cut it for me. Yes, it helps and i’m certainly appreciative that it is not zero (as it would have been otherwise). However, it is still far too little, especially when it is estimated that we spend 20 billion every year on oil industry subsidies.

[-] Womble@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Look, its almost $3 from each US citizen, I dont see how more could be done.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 16 points 6 months ago

This is one of a string of announcements which have been coming out a few times per week as the Inflation Reducton Act and infrastructure bills of the 2021-2022 congressional session are implemented

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 12 points 6 months ago

Anything but actually solving the problem.

[-] TheSambassador@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Jesus Christ, is Lemmy already at Reddit levels of not-reading-the-article and just assuming the worst? The comments used to be actually ok but here is almost everyone just making snarky comments that clearly didn't read the article and assuming that this is the only money that Biden has approved.

It literally says it's part of $50 billion earmarked for climate change related infrastructure.

Sure, complain that we spend way too much on military, but maybe you people should try and be better, examine your biases, and stop being part of the problem.

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago

Fully agreed with you. I'm also trying to improve, so sometimes I go back to my reply and add what action I want to see after I'm done venting my snark.

Kinda crazy and awesome that the 2021 bill is benefiting so many years after it's passed.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 4 points 6 months ago

We need more. Let's start seeing a domino effect of major energy conglomerates paying record awards from lawsuits.

[-] kemsat@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

And highways got more lanes, fixing everything once again…

[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

That’s like two bridges and a back alley.

To put it another way, GTA5 cost more than this to make.

[-] aniki@lemm.ee -1 points 6 months ago

Biden gives rich people more taxpayer money for doing nothing.

[-] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world -4 points 6 months ago

Just give that much in ev cars away probably better results

this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2024
172 points (97.3% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5212 readers
611 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS