312
submitted 5 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Ex-president calls Hopkins’ cannibalistic Lecter ‘late, great’ while condemning ‘people who are being released into our country’

Donald Trump on Saturday praised fictional serial killer Hannibal Lecter “as a wonderful man” before segueing into comments disparaging people who have immigrated into the US without permission.

The former president’s remarks to political rally-goers in Wildwood, New Jersey, as he challenges Joe Biden’s re-election in November were a not-so-subtle rhetorical bridge exalting Anthony Hopkins’ cannibalistic Lecter in Silence of the Lambs as “late [and] great” while simultaneously condemning “people who are being released into our country that we don’t want”.

Trump delivered his address to an estimated crowd of about 80,000 supporters under the shadow of the Great White roller coaster in a 1950s-kitsch seaside resort 90 miles (144.8km) south of Philadelphia.

The occasion served for Trump to renew his stated admiration for Lecter, as he’s done before, after the actor Mads Mikkleson – who previously portrayed Lecter in a television series – once described Trump as “a fresh wind for some people”.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 157 points 5 months ago

The article didn't have the full quote, so here it is:

Silence of the Lambs. Has anyone ever seen The Silence of the Lambs? The late, great Hannibal Lecter is a wonderful man. He often times would have a friend for dinner. Remember the last scene? ‘Excuse me. I’m about to have a friend for dinner,’ as this poor doctor walked by. ‘I’m about to have a friend for dinner.’ But Hannibal Lecter. Congratulations. The late, great Hannibal Lecter. We have people who are being released into our country that we don’t want in our country, and they’re coming in totally unchecked, totally unvetted.

[-] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 116 points 5 months ago

I think reading that is giving me dementia...

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 49 points 5 months ago

The brain worms are having a feast again.

[-] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 5 months ago

It would be sad if an elderly family member started talking this way. The fact that a presidential nominee is talking like this, and yet the polls are close, is a bit mind boggling.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MxM111@kbin.social 13 points 5 months ago

And they say dementia is not contagious…

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 76 points 5 months ago

I’m honestly baffled as to why a movie character would even come up in a political speech, much less this incoherently.

And yes, it’s a quote, it’s a funny line… why is he using it? It’s utterly silly. I’m also confused by the ‘late, great’ as if this was an actual person who had died, as opposed to a fictional character who hasn’t died in any book, movie or show I’m familiar with. And Anthony Hopkins is very much alive as well, as is writer Thomas Harris.

It doesn’t make any… goddamn… sense.

Please don’t elect this guy again.

[-] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Apparently this isn't the first time that he has related illegal immigrants to Hannibal. I'm not sure what he means by this - is he implying they're cannibals?

[-] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Heck, maybe he’s hoping Hannibal Lecter likes Mexican food, if you know what I mean.

God only knows what Trump’s thinking. Though he’s likely to be as confused as the rest of us mere mortals…

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] NOPper@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

He was just watching the movie on the flight to the rally.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 37 points 5 months ago

Wait is he advocating for the eating of immigrants?

Are these dependent or independent thoughts?

Also he does know Hannibal Lecter is fictional right?

And literally no person on the planet can give definitive answers.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 14 points 5 months ago

Also, does he understand the double meaning of "having a friend for dinner"?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MxM111@kbin.social 35 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This is like early versions of LLMs hallucinating.

EDIT: I feel I need to apologize to LLMs for this comparison.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 32 points 5 months ago

Here's the video. In context, it doesn't make a whole lot more sense than what's in the article. Here's a story that goes into the other more coherent things he said which are actually a good bit worse.

[-] kwomp2@sh.itjust.works 18 points 5 months ago

I don't know which one is actually worse.

A nostalgia themed glamourizing of brutality right next to "unwanted people". No explanation of how those two things connect, so all that stays is the association.

Kind of on a neuro-marketing like level of discours (just strenghtening your associations by creating emotions or atmosphere) he is mobilizing violence against immigrants. (And normalizing violence as a means of governing in general)

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

(And normalizing violence as a means of governing in general)

Yeah. I think as his dementia is getting more pronounced, his general admiration for people who kill you if you disagree with them is getting more explicit and weirdly specific and he's talking about it a lot more openly.

It's hard to tell even what the hell he means when he's talking about Hannibal Lecter. That's the only reason I say it's worse when he's talking about deporting protestors, because it's very clear what he means and it has more of a pathway to becoming reality. But I agree; my best guess when he talks about Hannibal Lecter and Al Capone is simply that he's playing it straight -- he admires someone who can casually talk about murdering other people, and aspires to be like that, because that means strength.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago

Does he... Does he just not know what referring to someone as "the late, great whatever" means? Does he just like the sound of the rhyme?

How do people in his audience come away from rallies like this one and go, "Yep, that's the guy who should be president"? Are they as brain-damaged as him?

[-] lettruthout@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Well apparently a lot of people didn't come to hear what he said, they left during the speech...

https://twitter.com/aliyareports/status/1789435508822561181

[-] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago

Never been to any political rally or event, but do people actually stay during the whole thing usually? People leave early during baseball games to beat the traffic, even if they like baseball or the match.

[-] lettruthout@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

I've only been to one that was big. It seemed like most people were still in the venue at the end, and it was slow going on way getting out.

[-] Silverseren@kbin.social 23 points 5 months ago

This is the nuclear speech all over again.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 5 months ago

No this is somehow weirder. He seems to be confusing movies and real people, and possibly thinking it’s still the 1980s, when silence is the lambs was popular.

Like mid stage Alzheimer’s dementia.

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago
[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago

You know, usually if I try hard I can kinda figure out how his rambling stream of consciousness verbal diarrhea got from one point to another. This is just...nonsense.

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

He's trying to say that the people coming into the country are dangerous criminals, but he's done the talking points so often by now that neither he nor his audience need the connective tissue between the ideas.

"Oh, now he's doing the Hannibal Lecter bit? Yeah, screw illegals or whatever."

They have their own coded language at this point where as Trump slips more and more into dementia they still understand what their adoptive hate spewing neo-Nazi grandpa dictator is talking about.

"And then the blargabaghehhhh...."

"Exactly. Fuck the blargabaghehhhh...."

Edit: I don't think I'll ever stop laughing when I see that clip, btw.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] criitz@reddthat.com 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

He must've just watched Silence of the Lambs on cable the night before. He always works the last thing he saw on TV into his speeches.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] IggyTheSmidge@kbin.social 75 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

How much d'you want to bet that Putin was waxing lyrical to him about Hannibal (the Carthaginian General and great military tactician), and the ignorant fuckwit assumed he meant Lecter?

Edit: typo.

[-] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml 36 points 5 months ago

I know the answer already, but does he not know that Hannibal is canonically a Lithuanian immigrant??

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago

Does it matter when the immigrant is white? My money is on those immigrants being the "good ones"

[-] lando55@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

I can't remember, is Lithuania on Trump's "shithole" list?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 32 points 5 months ago

I'm telling you folks, another great man persecuted by the democrats and fake news media. Clarice, what a vile woman. It gets the hose again she said.

[-] Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago

People are focused on the nonsense he’s spouting and I’m reading the full article and notice the quoted 62 year old Kelly Carter-Currier who proclaims if the right person doesn’t win, then we’re looking at WW3. Why are you waiting for a democratic process to happen when you’re not willing to accept the results unless its what you want? To which, you’re going to have a war to get it? JUST START THE FUCKING WAR. Or you know, shut up and let the rest of us that are actually wanting a better America (world) for everyone and not its current form where corporations and billionaires “win” while a majority of people work 3 jobs so they can afford to eat and sleep.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Because they're not going to start a war. It's just chest beating from them. Shit has gotta get a lot lot worse for even the thought of a civil war to be seriously thought about. We're not even close to it, people are still fed, clothed, housed and they still have jobs and their TV's and entertainment...no one is starting a war.

[-] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

Is there a transcript for the full speech anywhere? I'm not going to listen to audio of Trump talking but this article feels like it's doing a bit of cherry picking.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago

The full quote is given in another comment. And no, it doesn't make any sense whatsoever, even by Donnie's lofty standards.

[-] barooboodoo@lemm.ee 18 points 5 months ago

I'm honestly flabbergasted that after a decade of insane Trump quotes people still think context will make them any less insane.

[-] Kalkaline@leminal.space 19 points 5 months ago

It's important to give the full quotes because it further establishes that Trump and Biden are not equivalent. Biden will stumble over his words from time to time while making a coherent thought while Trump is confusing asylum with Silence of the Lambs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

This comment has the whole quote. It's usually a mistake to try and make sense out of what he says, but it kind of looks like he's trying to invoke the image of the cannibalistic serial killer and then saying that's the kind of criminal we're releasing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

Oh no, is Joe Biden going to take away my night vision goggles and fill in the well I keep my prisoners in too? WHO'S GOUNG TO FUCK ME??

Oh that's right. I'd fuck me. I'd fuck me so hard.

[-] AnAnonymous@lemm.ee 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Donnie Diapers needs a diaper change..

[-] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 13 points 5 months ago

80,000 ~~supporters~~ idiots.

Fixed.

[-] Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Read on a bit, the crowd thinned considerably as Trump was talking. He appears to be losing ground with people for his verbal diarrhea. We only need to hope its enough people either not voting or voting for biden.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

You couldn’t make this shit up. Republicans are worthless. Edit: mikkelson is a fucktard.

[-] HWK_290@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Mikkelsen's full quote, for those who want to continue to enjoy his acting

"He’s obviously not the classic politician, that’s for sure. I can definitely laugh at some of the stuff he says but I can also go, 'Oh my God, did he say that?' I think he’s a fresh wind for some people, but that’s what you’re voting for, I guess, right? It’s a big job," he said.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Since when do greasy sharts count as a “fresh wind”?!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kiernian@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Edit: mikkelson is a fucktard.

Without any concept of where the dude stands and knowing nothing more about him than the majority of hollywood leans more left than it does right, I took that "fresh wind" thing as comparing Trump to a fart without outright saying it.

Am I wrong?

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

I think so. Just my opinion.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Jafoo@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Late and great? Lecter hasn't died in fiction thus far

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

He could be signaling to some cult or secret society that he will literally let them eat people if he wins (/s)

Or he’s signaling to his base that they should go all Brevik and kill brown and black people (not /s)

Or he has dementia (also not /s)

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 May 2024
312 points (95.6% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4267 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS