450
submitted 5 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] zcd@lemmy.ca 183 points 5 months ago
[-] macaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone 57 points 5 months ago
  • Freedom not guaranteed. Subject to availability and restrictions at the time of issuance. Pursuant to obligations according to local regulations, your freedom may be more or less than the freedom implied. All rights reserved to freedom issuers. Freedom may be revoked at any time for any reason subject to local availability. Please visit your freedom office to dispute claims. Disputes may or may not be resolved at the freedom offices discretion, with resolutions including but not limited to the loss of additional freedom.
[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Conditions may apply.

For more information, please reread.

[-] OpenStars@discuss.online 21 points 5 months ago

Land of the free

You misunderstood, see it was "Land or the free"... and then they took all the land.

img

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 months ago

Free to do what they say.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tearsintherain@leminal.space 148 points 5 months ago

This is even more concerning when you look at some of the motivations: "The bill was largely spurred by recent protests on university and college campuses across the country, including North Carolina-based schools, against the war in Gaza."

this is about control, fascism. historically student protests are the canary in the coal mine on a number of issues. powers that be are looking to stamp out any dissent going forward.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 38 points 5 months ago

It's about all of that, but they absolutely could have put in an exemption for medical needs and chose not to. The anti-mask virtue signaling to their plague-ridden base is a bonus.

[-] tearsintherain@leminal.space 14 points 5 months ago

There is def throwing out meat for the rabid base. Feel like North Carolina is looking to hook up with TX and FL. University of North Carolina to divert $2.3m DEI budget to safety and policing "Some members of the board of trustees, which voted for the divestment, cited students’ recent anti-war demonstrations as a reason for the redesignation of funds to the campus police."

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 118 points 5 months ago

What a stupid fucking rule, guess immunocompromised people are just supposed to die?

[-] Lemmeenym@lemm.ee 85 points 5 months ago

In the article it says that immunocompromised people spoke during the public comments on the bill and Republican senators said that the bill would criminalize their wearing masks but they just won't be prosecuted for it.

[-] OpenStars@discuss.online 106 points 5 months ago

So the law would demand it, but the "trust me bro, I got yo back" defense says to ignore what the law actually says?

Okay, I think I will.:-P

[-] BajaTacos@lemm.ee 27 points 5 months ago

Pretty sure a SCOTUS justice said that they can't trust prosecutors to not do this just a month ago.

[-] OpenStars@discuss.online 19 points 5 months ago

Yeah, that's just simply not how laws work... and even if they did, for a time, people could forget and prosecute later, bc that's what the law says to do.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] irish_link@lemmy.world 33 points 5 months ago

So instead of just having cancer, you’ll have cancer and be a criminal.

[-] oce@jlai.lu 6 points 5 months ago

That's a much smoother way to become a criminal than by committing an actual crime, kinda convenient.

[-] lemmyng@lemmy.ca 23 points 5 months ago

AKA you'll be removed from the voter pool of you wear it.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Translation: don't worry about it if you are a cishet white Christian.

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Sounds like Florida's law about Mexicans, and then poof, all the Mexicans left Florida.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 82 points 5 months ago

I have strongly held religious beliefs that compel me to wear a mask whenever the fuck I want.

[-] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 37 points 5 months ago

Yeah… but their religion says that yours doesn’t count and only their beliefs matter.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Anise@lemmy.blahaj.zone 65 points 5 months ago

What about as a political statement? Isn't that still protected speech? You republicans made masking/not masking a political act, don't blame me.

[-] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Someone should try wearing a “Trump 2024” mask and see what happens

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 54 points 5 months ago

A bill written by representative I. N. Fluenza

[-] Gork@lemm.ee 42 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Do viruses control our Congress critters like the brain worms do?

[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago

Yes, RFK accidentally revealed he had a brain worm when his died and he regained control. I'm sure his goa'uld will be replaced soon.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 35 points 5 months ago

FREEDOM means having GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS make HEALTH decisions for YOU!

DId someone say Obama Death Panels?

[-] HaywardT@lemmy.sdf.org 35 points 5 months ago

Operating rooms are about to become interesting.

[-] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee 8 points 5 months ago

My guess is Operating rooms would be considered private, but EMTs… They clearly operate in public.

[-] Lemmeenym@lemm.ee 34 points 5 months ago

Sounds like it would conflict with the ADA.

[-] FoolishObserver@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago

What about for purely fashion reasons?

[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 53 points 5 months ago

Also illegal. Don’t worry though, the KKK is specifically listed as a group that can apply for an exemption. The reason that’s in there is because every version of the bill that explicitly listed the KKK as an organization that can’t apply for an exemption failed. I know this sounds like insane hyperbole and not something that actually happened, but that’s the state of things.

[-] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 5 months ago

The Onion can't keep up with reality anymore

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] neidu2@feddit.nl 23 points 5 months ago

Halloween is going to be interesting this year.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

"I'm not wearing the mask for health reasons. I'm cosplaying someone that doesn't want to get ill from a respiratory communicable disease."

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago

Silver lining: it will be a lot harder for cops to go undercover and pretend to be "Antifa" now.

[-] zqwzzle@lemmy.ca 20 points 5 months ago

Just in time for the avian flu.

[-] Iamsqueegee@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 months ago

Now that avian flu is available in hamberders, masks only get in the way of eating. So, still irrelevant and illegal.

[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

On the one hand, at least the Patriot Front have to show their faces now.

[-] niucllos@lemm.ee 20 points 5 months ago

Oh ho ho, where have you been that you think they'll hold their own side to this standard?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 5 months ago

Somebody please fire those legislators.

And prosecute them for reckless endangerment and spreading infectious disease.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

GUbMeNt oVeRrEaCH.

[-] Dipbeneaththelasers@lemmy.today 13 points 5 months ago

Bad title, if the article is accurate. What's happening is they are trying to repeal an exemption made in 2020 to existing anti-mask laws that were instituted to curtail secret societies and the KKK.

It does not appear that masking for health reasons was prosecuted before the exemption was made for covid. Would it be prosecuted now though is the question.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The title is 100% accurate. A thing being "illegal" isn't a matter of enforcement.

It was also a bad law to begin with. It may not have been prosecuted, but masking for health reasons should never have been illegal in the first place, because illegality both discourages use and opens the wearer up to risks of arbitrary enforcement or its use for pretextual stops or harassment.

And this is all assuming nothing changed since before COVID. Now masking is politicized and rightwing people (a disproportionate number of cops) get irrationally angry at medical masking.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

New NC slogan: "Stay healthy, stay out of NC!"

[-] SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Here’s hoping the language isn’t so ambiguous that hospital workers will have to stop treating infectious people and surgeons aren’t having to consult with legal counsel on whether they can operate.

In public… meaning public outside and not public areas of the hospital right? Ambulances? Do those count? Etc.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] LilDestructiveSheep@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Bragging about having to wear it. Now banning it. This is insane ..

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 5 months ago

Tell us again about your freedumb, conservs.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
450 points (97.9% liked)

News

23259 readers
3388 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS