This is sad, and they're getting the absolute wrong message here.
Beastimus
joined 2 months ago
I kinda love this framing actually. Can we also do sustainmaxxing, consumptionminning (I couldn't think of a good max version), and ethicsmaxxing?
Yeah, I get that. Its probably buying too many clothes. But, like the mindset of this thing is pretty bad, these things are unnecessary, but only bc a bunch have unnecessary in the name.
Indeed they do. Instead, we have a food surplus, a significant portion of which we burn.
I should actually fact check this, cause it sounds like something someone would have made up.
Yeah, absolutely, they want us poor, so they set it up that way. Also, what three, cause I only see one necessary one? (Not counting the ones that say "Overpriced/unnecessary" as eliminating the good/service altogether.) Its video games BTW, and they will not, I repeat, not make you poor. Generally they are a very good allocation of entertainment money in both hours and fun per dollar.
Remember Bernie Sanders, is not left wing, he's a liberal. Better than most democrats though.
Oh yeah, I think most of it is Carboniferous trees, technically the chicken nuggets are more accurate
No problem with people who need them having one (my family used to be one of those people,) but its just wasteful if you don't use it.
But in order to convince people to give up their car, you need a viable alternative to driving.
I got Centrist Marxist, which is pretty much right.
I should say, that's not how all Anarchists view it, but as far as I identify as an anarchist, that's what Anarchism is.
Still rather listen to him than most democrats