[-] Eximius@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

The gen z language identity is stronk

[-] Eximius@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

It's a (large) language model. It's good at language tasks. Helps to have hundreds of Gigs of written "knowledge" in ram. Differing success rates on how that knowledge is connected.

It's autocorrect so turbocharged, it can write math, and a full essay without constantly clicking the buttons on top of the iphone keyboard.

You want to keep a pizza together? Ah yes my amazing concepts of sticking stuff together tells me you should add 1/2 spoons of glue (preferably something strong like gorilla glue).

How to find enjoyment with rock? Ah, you can try making it as a pet, and having a pet rock. Having a pet brings many enjoyments such as walking it.

[-] Eximius@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

What the fuck? How can this "race" even be close? How brain-dead emotional are the voters? There are two candidates, you choose the person who's ideals and directions you believe in? How is the election process surprisingly similar to an ADHD kindegarten with a nominated side whose campaign is metaphorical shit slinging??

[-] Eximius@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago

If by ignore, you mean stop paying taxes and working in any capacity for government in one go, yes would work. The only fear is being singled out, if more than 0.5% of the people do it, army wont even have the guts to get tanks out, they will join.

[-] Eximius@lemmy.world 27 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

How could step one be anything besides the store taking a 2€ minus on their spreadsheet, instead of stopping flights. So many ways to hide a ceramic knife instead of a stupid pair of scissors uselessly incapable of doing anything on a plane.

All of these "security theatre" measures are just pure incompetence institutionalized due to 911, that managed to do nothing, just some security equipment manufacturers rich, and plane clients quite annoyed.

Hell, derailing a train would cause more human life / infrastructure damage, than a potential "guy has sharp object and cant do shit to the plane piloting" shit boomers are somehow still, in their old age, surprisingly afraid of.

Cars, trains, trucks all move freely, but somehow planes are terrified of extremely remote chance of bad actors trying to make a 911-esque political statement? (Because it's about the fanfare not actual damage, mooost buildings are much less secure than people would think)

[-] Eximius@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

That, and they can potentially dismantle staging areas for planes and other infrastructure (in this case gas pipeline).

[-] Eximius@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

Just-restrained-enough fact-based rage is damn sexy

[-] Eximius@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Well, if you get anywhere with that fake facade, then it will catch up to you.

Better start reading nicely written English books while doing this...

[-] Eximius@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Sorry, but as Eastern European, we begged for NATO membership because of constant (>200 years) Russian occupation hazard. We only care about America as a strong ally (of many) in the NATO group, there is no imperialism, direct, indirect, effective or otherwise interprettable. It's a purely defensive pact with all its tenets clearly and publicly laid out.

We could not fight back alone and we wouldnt be able to, because just as to Ukraine and as to Nazis, the amount of meat Russia (yes the whole country, not just Putin) is willing to throw into the meatgrinder is incomprehensible.

269

Kill me now.

[-] Eximius@lemmy.world 37 points 6 months ago

Ah, yes, the scary defense-only alliance. Purely by design it doesn't have the lawful capacity to do any of the things you said, and single members (US or UK) don't represent it.

Ah yes, no advancements in Ukraine where 1/3 of the country is under occupier control and in entrenched positions.

[-] Eximius@lemmy.world 173 points 9 months ago

They should not censor the company name.

[-] Eximius@lemmy.world 56 points 9 months ago

While the defence for science is nice (wasn't attacked here), outrage is allowed on public discourse. I think most people are outraged for the lack of inaction of regulatory bodies at the sight of extreme price fixing when everyone and their mother had at least the gut feeling that it is all bullshit.

view more: next ›

Eximius

joined 1 year ago