[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 14 points 3 weeks ago

oh of course there is

https://www.npmjs.com/package/is-even

(do take a look at the download stats)

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 14 points 1 month ago

would have to be quite a few bears to avoid heavy inbreeding

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 14 points 2 months ago

Every single time someone mentions they abandoned firefox for something "better", it's chromium based. Privacy is good, but the most important for me is to avoid monopoly/monoculture.

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 14 points 4 months ago

boomer humour? absolutely.
Peak? not even close.

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 14 points 4 months ago

Some people just dislike misinformation, regardless of whether it aligns with their world view.

There are plenty of real reasons homosexuality is natural, why invent fake ones?

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 14 points 6 months ago

well, it's probably paraphrased from reddit or somesuch, it's done similar before.

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 13 points 7 months ago

I don't see it, looks fine to me.

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 14 points 8 months ago

i thought it was a kfc..

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 14 points 9 months ago

In the near term, it’s pretty clear that zero-emission, light-duty vehicles will need to rely on batteries. So why are Toyota and Honda (and Hyundai and others) still so bullish on hydrogen?

To some degree, it’s like they wanted to invest in an image of being climate-conscious and technologically innovative while eschewing electric vehicles — the most common vision of a low-emissions transportation future.

Why is this article so agressively angled?

While it's clear the infrastructure isn't there right now, isn't hydrogen in the long term a clearly better alternative than ev's? The biggest problem with EV's being the battery, with all the horrible chemicals that go in to making them.

Shouldn't hydrogen, in the long term, be the obviously greener alternative, or am I missing something?

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 14 points 1 year ago

If they put the limit at 8kg you would make the same argument about 9.

I'm not saying they're not rent seeking, I trust them as far as I could throw them, but this is a false comparison. The weight limit of the overhead compartment and the total passenger weight of the plane are two completely different things.

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 14 points 1 year ago

None of those are countries I would want to live in, just saying.

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

'twas I who fucked the dragon fuckalie sing fuckaloo!

view more: ‹ prev next ›

FiskFisk33

joined 1 year ago